Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/23/2007 10:52:45 AM EDT
Sweet I want to be a scanner at the airport now!

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17296248/

Powerful X-ray machine debuts in Phoenix

MESA, Ariz. - A new X-ray machine for detecting weapons and explosives on airline passengers makes its debut today in Phoenix.

The so-called “backscatter” device will be used at one checkpoint in one terminal at Sky Harbor International Airport.

The machine visually strips off clothing, although a Transportation Security Administration spokesman says the image it projects looks more like a chalk drawing than a real person.

Airport officials say the program will be voluntary for people who require additional screening after going through the regular screening process. Those who choose not to go through the backscatter will be given a standard pat-down instead.

The X-ray technology was developed for prisons.

2/23/2007 10:55:36 AM EDT
[#1]
Similar:

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=542221

Except I believe this was in the UK, and it was on public streets.
2/23/2007 10:57:05 AM EDT
[#2]
Thats not an invasion of privacy.
2/23/2007 11:00:42 AM EDT
[#3]
I'd rather they use that thing than their hands to feel me up! (Well on most days anyways!)
2/23/2007 11:01:50 AM EDT
[#4]
Cool! This is a high-tech way of looking under women's dresses.
2/23/2007 11:02:32 AM EDT
[#5]
We are all gonna get cancer.

2/23/2007 11:07:33 AM EDT
[#6]
No big deal if you don't have anything to hide.
2/23/2007 11:07:38 AM EDT
[#7]
If it's just a chalk outline, maybe they should include a picture of a man and a woman from the front.  Then we can see just how "not revealing" it is.  
2/23/2007 11:08:57 AM EDT
[#8]
I can do tha same thing with a NV camcorder and an IR filter.  
2/23/2007 11:09:14 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
If it's just a chalk outline, maybe they should include a picture of a woman from the front.  Then we can see just how "not revealing" it is.  
The first person to walk into it was a woman.  she was dismayed at just how much it DOES show.
We're talking "count the pubic hairs" resolution, here.
2/23/2007 11:11:03 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
No big deal if you don't have anything to hide.

Quite correct comrade! Are your papers in order? How about we take a look.
2/23/2007 11:13:34 AM EDT
[#11]
I don't have a 14 year old daughter but if I did I wouldn't want some TSA screener checking her out.
2/23/2007 11:16:30 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
I don't have a 14 year old daughter but if I did I wouldn't want some TSA screener checking her out.


i have a 12yr old....i think this is a bad thing
2/23/2007 11:30:00 AM EDT
[#13]
You mean those X-ray Specs I used to see in comic books when I was a kid don't work????? I thought the technology was around since the 1970s.....
2/23/2007 11:34:53 AM EDT
[#14]
I can imagine some TSA security guard beating off while searching a underaged female, makes me sick to my stomach
2/23/2007 11:40:23 AM EDT
[#15]
Is that dude wearing a thong?
2/23/2007 11:41:04 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
X-Ray Machine removes only clothes....


2/23/2007 11:42:41 AM EDT
[#17]
Evil.
2/23/2007 11:42:51 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
Is that dude wearing a thong?



That was my first thought lol
2/23/2007 11:43:39 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
I can imagine some TSA security guard beating off while searching a underaged female, makes me sick to my stomach


I'd be willing to bet we would go to a men examine the men, women examine the women kind of system. But in this day and age.  It is still not good.
2/23/2007 11:44:22 AM EDT
[#20]
Makes me feel safer
2/23/2007 11:45:02 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Is that dude wearing a thong?



That was my first thought lol


Damn, I'm glad it wasn't just me.

You know, I was just about done with air travel anyway.  Fuck 'em, I'll drive from now on.
2/23/2007 11:47:29 AM EDT
[#22]
People - this is about Homeland security!  Don't you love your country?  Don't you want to be safe?  What are you, a bunch of radical terrorist sympathizers?

All of you complainers have been selected for multiple additional screenings... X-ray, manual, anal the works.  I, however, proudly support my President and all necessary measures to stamp out those evil terrorists!

(OK, TSA guys, I'm on your side!  See!?!?  I'll point out troublemakers for you!  Just don't send me into that machine!)
2/23/2007 11:49:15 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:
Sweet I want to be a scanner at the airport now!




"I'm sure Sarge, just look at that  spare tire. It's an ARFCOMer…"

ANdy
2/23/2007 11:50:16 AM EDT
[#24]
It's not new. Florida already has these. You use them if you fly out of Orlando.
2/23/2007 11:56:13 AM EDT
[#25]
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.
2/23/2007 12:03:18 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.


Are you taking bets on how long it will remain optional?
2/23/2007 12:04:59 PM EDT
[#27]
If I ever have to walk through one of those things, I will do by best to make sure I'm sporting a raging hard-on.
2/23/2007 12:15:06 PM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.


Are you taking bets on how long it will remain optional?


+1.  Just a matter of time before "We've been doing this optionally for years, time to make it mandatory, don't worry it's for your safety".
2/23/2007 12:16:39 PM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
If it's just a chalk outline, maybe they should include a picture of a man and a woman from the front.  Then we can see just how "not revealing" it is.  



Good point. Just looking at the pic shown you can tell its not going to be "not revealing"
2/23/2007 12:19:00 PM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.


Are you taking bets on how long it will remain optional?


+1.  Just a matter of time before "We've been doing this optionally for years, time to make it mandatory, don't worry it's for your safety".





Yep,and then they will be putting them in bus stations,train stations,high crime areas..................


eta-and after one generation of kids getting used to these being "no big deal",on to the next step.1984.
2/23/2007 12:25:34 PM EDT
[#31]
hey... is that...

heavy6??  
2/23/2007 12:31:07 PM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:
hey... is that...

heavy6??  




That's a good point-they can also use it to measure body fat,and if your ass looks like 200lbs of chewed bubble gum,the fedgov.,for your own health and well being,will put you on a special diet.

It will be easy to adjust your soon to have national id/monetary exchange card to only allow you to purchase healthy,government approved food.
2/23/2007 12:36:53 PM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.




Grey
AssHat
2/23/2007 12:46:19 PM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.


Gun buy backs are optional too.
2/23/2007 12:57:20 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:
If it's just a chalk outline, maybe they should include a picture of a man and a woman from the front.  Then we can see just how "not revealing" it is.  


Go here to see a woman.  LINK

Questionable content, but it was from a newspaper site.

If it is offensive, I'll remove it.  I acutally removed the link when I originally posted
the thread last month.

2/23/2007 12:59:39 PM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:
You mean those X-ray Specs I used to see in comic books when I was a kid don't work????? I thought the technology was around since the 1970s.....


I bought a pair of those when I was in 2nd grade. They don't work. I thought for sure I was gonna be able to see through Carla S. cloths. Was I disappointed
2/23/2007 1:15:55 PM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:
Is that dude wearing a thong?


Hmmm...may not be a man, could be a fat woman.  I suppose they wear thongs too, but the mental image is...
2/23/2007 1:39:33 PM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.


Are you taking bets on how long it will remain optional?


+1.  Just a matter of time before "We've been doing this optionally for years, time to make it mandatory, don't worry it's for your safety".


Yep,and then they will be putting them in bus stations,train stations,high crime areas..................


eta-and after one generation of kids getting used to these being "no big deal",on to the next step.1984.


So, because a technology could be used wrongly, it shouldn't be used at all...
2/23/2007 5:52:48 PM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why the big deal? I can understand being worried about this becoming mandatory, but as is it's an optional, second-line thing. If you prefer a traditional pat-down or strip search, you can choose to do that instead.


Are you taking bets on how long it will remain optional?


+1.  Just a matter of time before "We've been doing this optionally for years, time to make it mandatory, don't worry it's for your safety".


Yep,and then they will be putting them in bus stations,train stations,high crime areas..................


eta-and after one generation of kids getting used to these being "no big deal",on to the next step.1984.


So, because a technology could be used wrongly, it shouldn't be used at all...



It depends on the technology-is it going to make life better?Or advance the police state?Who decides the definition of "wrongly"?

I used to think we were on a slippery slope-now I think we are on an escalator.
The trade of supposed security for liberties continues on-welcomed by the majority.