User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 8:22:43 PM EDT
[#1]
Provided there is no replacement to the bill, yes.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 8:27:03 PM EDT
[#2]
WHEN the ban goes away... all that "pre-ban/post-ban" crap will be moot. All the features will be on equal terms again.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 8:35:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Legal...yes.
Smart...no. It would be much more cost-effective to install the goodies on your post-ban upper. [:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 8:40:50 PM EDT
[#4]
have a new, pre-ban barrel on hand...say by Sept 12th.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2003 4:41:27 AM EDT
[#5]
yes
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2003 4:46:23 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted: Provided there is no replacement to the bill, yes. I concur. Me personally, I think a replacement will be on hand. I don't believe it will be as restrictive though is Ashcroft and Bush has any say to it. Also if Bush never see the paper to re-new it on his desk, he won't have anything to sign would he??? So call you sen/rep and call often. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2003 4:50:15 AM EDT
[#7]
but ... if the .gov doesnt say I CANT have it anymore.....
then why do I want it? [:D] ps.. Morning everybody! < 257 day 16 hours 10 min.... but whos counting..! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2003 5:44:31 AM EDT
[#8]
Two things....
1) There will be a replacement. I envision it being MORE restrictive than the one we have now. Don't believe me? I hope you're right, but I doubt it. 2) As cluster said, all the gee-whiz and way-cool factor of the pre-ban crap will go away IF the ban is not renewed. People will rush right out initially to buy a bayonet-lugged gun, but after awhile folks will wonder why they were so antsy to have the damn things to begin with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2003 7:30:23 AM EDT
[#9]
We all try to get folks to contact their congressmen, but how many actually do? If we are lulled into thinking that all will go right because 'someone else' is working hard, then we will lose out.
And most importantly, if we think that just because we are talking about it, that the anti-gun libs are not talking about it as well, then our naivete' (sp) will bite us in the butt when we arent looking. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2003 7:44:16 AM EDT
[#10]
Imagine for a moment if a replacement DID get passed, but there was a 30 day lapse between the two laws.
"So, is this an old pre-ban or new pre-ban, and is that 'post-ban' a post-ban from before the 'new' ban?" [thinking] |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
