User Panel
Posted: 9/28/2005 10:42:58 AM EDT
I haven't found a link yet, but it's true.
|
|
Finally, a link...
Pentagon Approves Osprey Production
|
|
|
Another:
Pentagon approves full-rate V-22 production |
|
|
Woot. I loved watching their flight testing at Pax River when I was working there.
Kharn |
|
Awesome vtol plane! But have they finally gotten all the "kinks" out of the plane? I recall watching a semi documentary about it which said that it had some serious flaws.
|
|
|
|
You old guys need to let go. It will be a solid platform. Good for them. I hope it has as long as a career as the 46's and 53's have. |
|
|
|
|
Remember when the Black Hawk was being tested. They were so bad thy were called crash hawks, but they became one of the greatest helos the .mil fielded |
|
|
In 40 years the people here will be pissed off becuase the 22 will be replaced with something else. The same way they cried about the F-14 being replaced with a a superior airframe. |
||
|
Ive heard they have problems...but they do look pretty cool.
Heres a video of one crashing. V-22 Crash |
|
Hey, can a V-22 dogfight? If so, we should load it up as a gunship to go after enemy attack helicopters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAG: after watching that video again, I'm glad I won't be riding in that thing.
the words sitting duck come to mind.[gulp] |
|
I think production of the Osprey is a terrible mistake. This is a political decision that will kill hundreds of our soldiers. Bear in mind that these aircraft being flown and crashed are piloted by professional test pilots. There is a history of this happening before with the AV8 harrier, which we in the military used to call "camouflaged body bags".
|
|
If it still has a 6000psi hydraulic system in a combat vehicle they have not corrected the serious flaws. |
|
|
The other problem is survivability. Everything that makes the A10 great, the Osprey doesnt have. The A10 took some serious hits and came back home, even if it never flew again. The Osprey is most likely going down. It is too complex and too vulnerable.
|
|
The fact that everything on the aircraft is designed to be as light as possible to the exclusion of reliabilty and survivablity is worrysome on a Marine transport. I would sooner take the space shuttle into combat.
|
|
This comparison means nothing. It's no more vulnerable than any other helicopter and offers much better capabilities. |
|
|
The video shows what happens when a tech reverses the fly-by-wire connections on your cyclic. Somewhat controllable at altitude when the pilot has time to think about reversing control movements, but far less so close to the deck when a helo pilot makes multiple minute corrections every couple of seconds. |
|
|
The two planes that crashed and killed the 23 Marines were piloted by active duty Marine pilots, not test pilots. One crash was the result of mechanical failure, the other was an issue of the flight envelope the plane was being flown at. If you think the Harrier is the only SUCCESSFUL aircraft that had issues early on in it's life, then you are mistaken. I would certainly rather take my chances in than continue to fly in 40 year old Phrogs. |
|
|
It should read "Pentagon OK's full production of USMC's new Lawn Dart".
|
|
ironic that so much smack is talked about the v-22 on an AR-15 board.
|
|
Quite ironic, as the F-16 was the previous owner of said unofficial title... It's now quite successful... As for the A-10 and 'survivability' comments, this is a TRANSPORT HELICOPTER (with a nifty turn-into-a-plane capability)... It's no more/less complex, and no more/less armored than the Blackhawk... P.S. Very few modern aircraft haven't crashed in testing... That this one happened to crash with passengers on board is unfortunate, but that has no bearing on the quality of the aircraft itself... |
|
|
The nickname "lawn dart" did not arise from any shortcomings with the F-16 itself. It simply outflew the pilot and caused some of them to blackout. A G-limiter in the fly-by-wire system prevents G's above 9G (?). It must really suck to have a plane that's that maneuverable. Other than that kaptan wire chafing issue, the F-16 is our most successful fighter program. The USMC needs the V-22 desperately. So does the Air Force in support of SpecOps and pilot recovery. Now, don't get me started on VSTOL aircraft and the Harrier mistake. |
||
|
Cool. Beats the hell outta old Shithooks and the rest of the rusted out crap rotary wings most army/usmc/navy pilots get to try not to kill themselves in.
|
|
Speaking of Hooks, you take a round in the C-box and you are going down. |
|
|
Anybody see the add that Bell put out without checking first with Boeing? It showed SF rappelling from an Osprey onto a mosque. Caption reads something like this:
"It descends from the heavens." "Ironically, it unleashes hell." Boeing and Bell tried to have it pulled, but it showed up in a couple Armed Forces Journel and last week's National Journal magazine. I've got a *.jpeg of the ad, but it's not too terribly clear, unfortunately. Merlin |
|
I would think the Osprey, due to it's design and performance, would be less vulnerable or at worst equal to the best transport helicopter in inventory to ground fire.
|
|
Check out page one of this thread. |
|
|
WTF? The A-10 is a lot less rugged than a M1 Abrams. A solid 100 ton block of hardened steel is tougher than an Abrams. I guess instead of Ospreys we should buy large chunks of steel. That will a very survivable system. |
|
|
Thanks. One of the downsides of posting at work: can't read all the responses, especially in a multi-page thread. Thanks, Merlin |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.