While you were watching those Police Chase shows on the tube, were there any moments where any of the officers did anything stupid. Where they took any chances they shouldn't have? Where they had a full-on smash 'em, bash 'em over a minor charge?
Everyone of those shows I watch has these moments in abundance.
You'd think mature officers would make better decisions, huh? There is a significant difference, IMHO, in being *mature* enough to be a cop (after all, if we don't hire 'em young, how the heck are we going to get 30 years out of 'em?) and being mature as a cop.
After all, by its very definition -- ma•ture \m€-"tur, -"tyur\ adj ma•tur•er; -est 1 : based on slow careful consideration 2 : having attained a final or desired state 3 : of or relating to a condition of full development
(c)2000 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All rights reserved. -- it takes time.
It has been estimated that it takes 3-6 years for an patrol officer to reach their most effective level of performance. That leaves plenty of time to initiate and continue reckless pursuits.
Further, there is no shortage of low-quality cops in the US. Many jurisdictions/agencies cannot hire competitively enough to avoid problem cops. Others provide little training beyond the academy, have no FTO programs, do not develop or publish policies, and operate under poor/no supervision.
Most agencies really try to hire good officers, but it just doesn't always work out that way. Therefore, I stand by my opinion, which is in many respects shared by the major police professional organizations, that the supervisor have the authority to terminate.
***************
I certainly don't advocate and did not suggest that the Feds set the punishment guidelines for a person who flees by vehicle. My suggested sentence is well within the powers of any state to impose. The federal government does not issue drivers licenses or enforce state traffic laws.