Lonegunman, you seem to take this passage to mean blind obedience to the husband, I submit it says nothing of the sort.
God understands something the military has been doing for years--the concept of unity of command, or "there can only be one commander". God wants the MAN to be the head of the household. Period.
This passage doesn't mean the woman's chain should only be long enough to reach from the bedroom to the kitchen--it means that the wife should understand that there can only be one head of the household, and that SOMEONE has to make the final decision, and the rest of the family (including the wife) should therefore support it.
It also doesn't mean that the wife should be silent; she can (and in the case of my wife, regularly) try to influence him and change his mind, as directed in verse 6. Sarah (Abraham's wife) was far from the silent submissive wife, but she accepted her husband's decisions like any good second-in-command should. In fact, like any good second-in-command, the wife has the RESPONSIBILITY to let her husband know when he's making a mistake.
This passage does NOT authorize a wife to undermine her husband, to effectively castrate him in front of his family, to be a hothead, fiery-tempered, or rude. It suggests that women do their job (as assigned by God), by being a gentle, quiet spirit. Says nothing about being a doormat. It also demands that a husband's actions towards his wife be respectful and considerate (verse 7). Says nothing about treating her like dirt.
AR-10's family works like mine. My wife looks to me to make the final decisions (sometimes not gracefully, but I submit we all have that problem), and the fact that I understand she will do that makes me ask for her opinion and consider the effects of my decisions on her and her life.
Those who use this verse to treat their wives like property are beneath contempt, as are those who use this passage to say that Christianity expects women to be equivalent to slaves. Neither group has bothered to read the entire passage, in context.