User Panel
Posted: 6/1/2008 4:58:10 PM EDT
Afghan insurgents 'on brink of defeat'
The Telegraph By Thomas Harding in Lashkar Gah Last Updated: 10:31PM BST 01/06/2008 Missions by special forces and air strikes by unmanned drones have "decapitated" the Taliban and brought the war in Afghanistan to a "tipping point", the commander of British forces has said. The new "precise, surgical" tactics have killed scores of insurgent leaders and made it extremely difficult for Pakistan-based Taliban leaders to prosecute the campaign, according to Brig Mark Carleton-Smith. In the past two years an estimated 7,000 Taliban have been killed, the majority in southern and eastern Afghanistan. But it is the "very effective targeted decapitation operations" that have removed "several echelons of commanders". This in turn has left the insurgents on the brink of defeat, the head of Task Force Helmand said. "The Taliban are much weaker," he said from 16 Air Assault Brigade headquarters in Lashkar Gah. "The tide is clearly ebbing not flowing for them. Their chain of command is disrupted and they are short of weapons and ammunition." Last year's killing of Mullah Dadullah, the Taliban chief, most likely by the Special Boat Service, was "a seminal moment in dislocating" their operation in southern Afghanistan, said Brig Carleton-Smith, 44, who has extensive operational experience in Afghanistan and Iraq and has commanded elite Army troops. "We have seen increasing fissures of stress through the whole organisation that has led to internecine and fratricidal strife between competing groups." Taliban fighters are apparently becoming increasingly unpopular in Helmand, where they are reliant on the local population for food and water. They have also been subjected to strikes by the RAF's American-made Reaper unmanned aerial vehicle and the guided Royal Artillery missile system, which have both proved a major battlefield success. "I can therefore judge the Taliban insurgency a failure at the moment," said Brig Carleton-Smith. "We have reached the tipping point." The task is now to regenerate the economy to win over the civilian population of Helmand, the base for 8,000 British soldiers. Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital, appears to be a town on the cusp of an economic boom if security remains stable. A new airport will be ready by the end of this year and a packaging factory by the end of next year. This could enable the soil-rich "fruit basket of Afghanistan" to export its food. Alternative crops, such as wheat or rape, could prove a greater attraction than Helmand's massive opium trade, especially as international prices continue to rise. Much of the Taliban operation is run by Mullah Omar and to a lesser extent al-Qa'eda from their headquarters in Quetta, across the border in Pakistan. The ability of what is known as the Quetta Shura leadership had been "hugely reduced" and its influence "increasingly marginalised", the brigadier said. Michael Ryder, the senior Foreign Office official in Helmand, agreed that intelligence assessments suggested that the Taliban had become "fractured and fragmented". "There's a lot of suspicion from southern Taliban commanders of the agenda of Quetta Shura," he said, with the leaders trying to draw in an estimated £20 million a year from the opium trade. The number of Afghans involved in the insurgency has also fallen, with increasing numbers of Pakistanis, Chechens, Uzbeks and Arabs found dead on the battlefield. However, with the shortage of helicopters still a problem, most movement is by road and Brig Carleton-Smith warned that British forces must prepare for an increasingly Iraq-style insurgency as the Taliban modified its tactics from pitched battles to ambushes and roadside bombs. |
|
Most successful counter-insurgencies take 10. |
|
|
I know - the Russians did it so much quicker! |
|
|
??? |
|
|
Probably rapeseed. |
||
|
Rapeseed oil? Never heard of it? |
||
|
Yeah I have, but it's still funny to call "rape" an export. |
|||
|
AKA Canola Oil |
|||
|
Here's an interesting "backgrounder" on the multi-national counter-terrorism and security forces in Afghanistan. Many countries, including every NATO member participates:
Multi-national Forces in Afghanistan |
|
|
You know your country is fucked up when its main export is rape
|
|
aww hell not again |
|||
|
Source? |
||
|
Joint Special Operations University's Counter-Insurgency Warfare Course (CIWC). You can start by reading the USMC's small wars manual. I can provide a list that will take you a year to read, all the references say the same thing. 10 years is the minimum to fight a successful counter-insurgency. archive.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=494588 |
|||
|
Ha!! Take that. Kill each other off. Works for me. |
|
|
If you've got links that would be an interesting list. Just finished my last non-fic book, kind of looking for another. |
||||
|
this is good news then yes?
eta by which i mean that theatre is almost sewed up and troops are ready for exfil then? |
|
Why? The UN has been exporting rape for years! |
||||
|
I'm sure there are some guys in Afghanistan who are on ARFCOM, any of you guys can substantiate that claim?
|
|
The links are in the thread I referenced: archive.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=494588 Here are a few of them:
USMC Small Wars Manual (free PDF) |
||||||
|
Imagine if the string-pullers who control what the masses hear and see on the news for the past 5 years were actually SUPPORTING their country by not hamstringing the military, not undercutting morale, not reporting half-truths, not fabricating outright lies and actually being honest and HONORABLE to their own country and to basic human decency instead of clinging to the enemy, emboldening the terrorists, supporting the insurgents and incessantly siding against their own countrymen during war. Imagine if the people of America and Britain were actually swayed to SUPPORT their country in a time of war rather than swayed AGAINST their country by the mainstream media that control "the truth" that is reported to the people. The enemy who cut off the heads of innocent people, who strap bombs to their children and who hide behind the very civilians they shoot in the back have NO greater friend or ally than the Western Media and the suicidally-corrupt Socialists who try so hard to get us to lose this war for their own fleeting political gain. |
|
One of the greatest disappointments of my adult life came while I was a US intelligence officer. Intel guys always get their information sources rated by RELIABILITY of the source and the PLAUSIBILITY of the information. RELIABILITY is rated A through E. A = Almost always reliable, D = Almost always unreliable, and E = Unknown. PLAUSIBILITY is rated 1 through 5. 1 = Highly plausible and likely. 4 = Highly implausible and unlikely. 5 = Unknown. Thus the best source is A-1. Worst is D-4. And TOTALLY unknown is E-5. THE DISAPPOINTMENT: When it comes to anything involving politics, the major US media sources are often C-2 or C-3. During the Cold War, a Soviet citizen was likely to get more accurate and reliable information from Pravda than a US citizen was likely to get from a major US news source whether or not it was a newspaper or a TV news anchor. BBC International was usually the most reliable and accurate unclassified news source. (I am just a civilian now but the only major media source I STILL trust today is BBC World) US media is generally owned by very wealthy, economically liberal owners. They will deliberately conceal news worthy information to put moderate or conservative politicians of BOTH major political parties at disadvantage. Thus, in the current POTUS campaign, McCain and Clinton are taking it in the shorts. Good news from the front, e.g. Iraq and Afghanistan, is usually suppressed. Bad news from the front is highlighted. This has been going on for decades but it seems to have gotten extreme in the last decade or so, and the worst I have seen is since about 2005. It's too bad the average "joe" US citizen can't see the "real stuff". BTW the funny/sad thing is that CNN International (CNN-I) is about as good as BBC World if you can get it. However, how many of you can even subscribe to CNN-I here in the US? Good luck. THEY don't want you to get this news. The fact is, media owners are controlling what the US citizen sees on TV and Internet more successfully than the Soviet propaganda ministry managed to do against the Soviet citizens during the Cold War. Such is the benefit of Freedom of Speech. Media owners and announcers should be deeply, deeply ashamed. |
|
|
With food prices opium could be a loser. |
|||
|
You don't celebrate, or declare victory when an enemy is "almost" done. The Taliban has shown amazing ability to bounce back. Good news like this is reason for politicians and generals to cut back (even more) resources for Afghanistan and send them to Iraq.
Insurgency in Last Throes May 31, 2005 (http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/30/cheney.iraq/) |
|
Yea we know… good news is really bad news. |
|
|
Didn't I read this article back in 2005?
ETA, looks like Weakling beat me to it. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.