Quoted:
Maybe they weren't designed to slug it out with other tanks? Armor concepts change. The T34
tank was designed by an American, but we,
apparently didn't want it then. The US was far superior in recovering damaged tanks in the field. The Israeli army used Shermans way past
the end of WWII. John
View Quote
T-34 designed by who?? I know that many Russian tanks used a Christie suspension and that was designed by an American. But I think the T-34 was designed by the Russians.
Shermans were designed to be reliable. They started and ran when needed. German armor didn't always do that. Russian armor was supposedly more reliable than German, less reliable than the Shermans.
Shermans also were up-gunned and up-armored throughout the production run, and in the field. There were 76 mm gun versions, and the Sherman "Jumbo". Not to mention the Sherman "Firefly" with a long barrel 17 pounder that the British used.
The Germans were probably better a recovering and repairing tanks. North Afrika Corps tanks were killed and rebuilt regularly. The Germans would also recover, repair, and repaint other countries tanks. Their problem became that they didn't have recovery vehicles strong enough to recover their Tigers and King Tigers, except for a few converted Tiger hulls. Many of those tanks were still functional when lost but not mobile. They called that a "mobility kill".
If you study WWII esp. in Poland and Russia, the early war tanks were 3-5 tons and armed with mg's or 20 mm auto cannons. Much different than the tanks that were rolling around in 1943-44. The Sherman was basically in production for the US from the start of the war. It would have been a heavily armed and armored tank at the start but barely adequeate by the end of the war. Of course the were aircraft and AA guns that could kill any tank from the start of the war to the end. You can't be armored enough for everything.
I see your point in the US adapting German tank ideas, fewer and heavier. That maybe true, but if we got to war it would take so long to build new planes and tanks......... the thought is any war will be more or less over by the time replacement vehicles become available so you will fight with what you have.
The heavy German tanks were often supported by far less capable vehicles. The Panther was the tank that was feared, because it did it all, heavy weapon, good armor, and good mobility. The Leopard 2, Abrams M1A2, and the M60A5(?) all have great armor, guns, fire control, and mobility. They are like Panthers on steriods. Sure there aren't that many of them, but who is gonna mess with them, knowing that all are backed up by infantry, tactical and strategic airpower. It's a package deal that wasn't offered before.....[:)]