Grundsau;
I can't get to the original post either. So, going off memory, let me begin by writing that I don't think I called you a hypocrite, and I apologize if I did. Also, I agree with your post #1, that journalism is way slanted these days.
I appreciate what you say in #2, but what struck me (IIRC) in the original thread was the dichotomy between advocacy and neutrality. If journalism is indeed neutral, then we have to accept others' arguments and tolerance thereof in even our magazines. If we accept advocacy in journalism, then we can't complain. Except to cancel our subscriptions, which is what I think you said you did anyways.
It was just the dichotomy, the contrast, which caught my attention.
Thanks for the reply.