I don't understand the fascination with tiny pistol sized barrels....
Here's my advice on the AR-15. I admit that I'm not the most fluent gun guy on the board, but when I got my AR-15 there was one thing I kept in mind.
Many people think that the AR15 shoots a pussy round. Lots of guys insist on the .30 cal theory, but the .223 is a potent round if it is used the way it works best. The .30 cal guns usually don't break the 3000 fps (feet per second) barrier. The rounds are usually heavy (The 7.62x39 weighs in at about 123 grains i think) and the bullets pack a lot of energy. One reason that the 7.62x39 is said to be so inefficient at killing is because it buzzes right through targets unless it impacts a solid (bone, skull, etc). The .223 is a fantastic round when the ballistics exceed the 3000 fps range. Once that sucker gets moving, the bullet becomes very deadly.
Think of it this way...... If I jump off a diving board into a pool I break the water and slide right in. Now, if I jump off a helicopter into a still body of water, the water does not break fast enough, and my bones will break. Now if I jump out of a satellite and hit the water (considering that I don't incinerate in the atmosphere) My body will explode as it enters the water. My body will burst into many pieces, and bits of my body will go shooting into the water in many different directions.
The .223 can burst after only a few inches of soft tissue. The round does not cut well through the flesh since it's going so fast, and it is not able to stay together. The bits of copper jacket fragment and zip through organs as the lead flattens out and then flies every which way as it bursts.
[b]Yowch[/b]
Now, the thing that's silly to me is the guys that insist on shorter and shorter barrels. Some dudes have 14" barrels with a 2" brake on it to meet the 16" bbl requirement. The preban guys will get these uppers that have shorter barrels than pistols! Well, the .223 coming out of these short barrels simply does not build up enough pressure to become effective. The tiny 55 grains of metal enter the body, and often does not even destabalize before it passes through the body. Seems to me that it completely negates the advantage you get with the round. In Black Hawk down, the spec ops guys were using the 11.5" bbl and repeatedly complained of the lack of effect the bullets had. The bullets hitting the somolies were compared to ice pick stab wounds. Very tiny holes that went right through. They were using tungsten tipped 62 grn rounds, but still the analogy would likely hold with the 55 grn rounds.
I went with the 20" barrel to keep my fps high. I don't think that cutting off 4" of barrel to have a little package will really ever make a lot of difference in manueverability. I also liked the Heavy barrel since it should aid in accuracy.
Well, that was my though process in getting my sexy momma....
[img]http://www.student.smsu.edu/s/srv656s/ar15right.jpg[/img]
Here is a diagram of the .223 at different velocities.
[img]http://www.gunsnet.net/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=384533[/img]
Shawn