User Panel
Posted: 9/23/2005 10:09:54 AM EDT
Higher education making more and more idiots every day!
Looks like Yale's diploma = worthless www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=29953
Get ready folks, because this is what the Democratic party has become. If they get back into power, kiss your Rights good bye and say hello to becoming a slave to a system. |
|
|
Something tells me that 1) Jeff isn't all that good of a history student; and 2) with his alma mater being Yale, with his attitude he certainly won't be getting tapped to hang out in the Skull & Crossbones crypt.
|
|
We are a representative republic, not a democracy. |
|
|
I love hearing that the Constitution is a "Living, breathing document"
I admit- occasionally changes (additions, etc) must be made... but none that repeal rights... |
|
He's a Ph.D student and he still doesn't realize that we live in a Republic and not a Democracy. Obviously, he needs to study the Constitution more himself before he goes bashing it. |
|
|
This is at the top of the list for Stupidest Thing I've Read Today.
|
|
Apparently Jeff never noticed in his six years of PhD work that Thomas Jefferson had exactly ZERO involvement with the drafting of the Constitution. Yet he quotes or paraphrases Jefferson three times as though he were the sole authority on the document.
James Madison spent the last 39 years of Jefferson's life trying to straighten out Jefferson's distorted views of what the Constitution did and did not do. |
|
This DEFINANTLY takes the cake |
|
|
Hey give the guy a break- he's still a student!
"Layne, I have been here seven years... I am no dummy" |
|
Hey, well at least they are admitting it now. Admitting that they are enemies of the Constitution. They have gotten so used to merely paying it lip-service while completely disregarding it that they figure 'what the fuck, why even pretend because no one obviously cares.'
As mad as this makes me, I am glad this article was written, and I hope that more of these cocksuckers will follow this lead and 'come out of the closet.' No more excuses of why we can't protect the Constitution from these people based on the fact that they pretend to be incapable of reading the english language. They are our enemies. Plain and simple. |
|
I've never opened a thread before which actually sucked my IQ out through my eyeballs before. Where shall we start?
I'm sure an email to him would result in "It's just my opinion! Let's agree to disagree." response from him. |
||||
|
Yes indeed. Our enemies are making themselves known. I wonder what this asshat's response would be when reminded that the full power and force of the entire US Military is sworn to defend that piece of paper that he hates so badly. |
|
|
An even better question for our illustrious scribe: If the Constitution is not worth abiding by, why cannot the government throw his useless rear in prison for printing such a screed? And Mr. Mankoff you are not allowed to claim a First Amendment right. That would be mere Constitution worship, and a bad thing. We would not want you to be a hypocrite.
|
|
I am shocked - shocked that an Ivy League historian is denigrating the US Constitution. |
|
When the Supreme Court handed down it's Roe vs Wade ruling the libs all cried "it's the Constitution" all hail the almighty constitution. If it's a right in the Constitution you must bow down and worship...after all SCOTUS never, ever makes a mistake."!
Now faced with the real prospect that SCOTUS might overturn Roe or that their pet projects can't be passed via amendment... they suddenly have nothing to do with the Constitution and it's not THAT important! ah, the irony. |
|
Not that we were short on ways to discredit the author here but does has he even read the Constitution? |
|
|
|
||
|
And then there is the obvious question, "Wise according to whom?" The moron who wrote this piece of flatulent bilge? |
||
|
He must know the "I hate the soldiers" moron. |
||
|
Yes, let's just rub out those nasty little state boundaries and in time we'll rub out the national boundaries too. Same logic. |
||
|
Shocked even more that anyone is getting their tits in a wringer over anything said Ivy League Historian has to expound upon. Fuck em. He's stupid. |
|
|
Another College Prof that has no idea how the real world works. When I went to college I was amazed at how many so called Prof's and Teachers had no clue how the real world works. I always thought it was funny we were told to learn business from a Professor that has never owned a business or worked out side the institution in his life. Go Figure. Look at the Forbes top 400 rich folks and notice how many have finished college. Some of them will suprise you.
The most sucessful folks I know personally have never had 1 semster of college. |
|
Those who can't do, teach. |
|
|
wow, cant believe i read something that dumb. he needs a kick in the mouth.
|
|
An article like that should have a warning up front:
WARNING: READING THIS TRIPE KILLS BRAIN CELLS. YOU MAY END UP AS STUPID AS THE AUTHOR. |
|
The only thing I'll take issue with...six years is not unreasonable for a Ph.D.. Many Ph.D.s take the better part of a decade from start to finish. Look at the average time-in-program for a handful of doctorates and you'll vomit. Jim |
|
|
Easiest and fairest, huh? Easy and fair to whom, exactly? I don't think I'd trust our current crop of asshats to rewrite a bedrock principle of our way of life in a way that would be easy or fair to any of us. |
|
|
A little Billy Madison seems appropriate. |
|
|
I finished my Masters and PhD work (in Constitutional History, imagine that) in a total of four years. A PhD in History should not take 6 years. It's not like the hard sciences. Finish the courses, pass your comps, write your thesis. With the internet availablity of many archives today, you can do a lot of the thesis research without leaving your home. <--- shrugs. |
||
|
Doublefeed for President! |
|||||
|
He is just spreading propaganda.
He knows how the system works he just doesn't like it. That whole WY has the same clout as CA is just killing him. Too bad pal, we like it the way it was designed to be GM |
|
Jeff Wankoff can kiss my Constitution revering fat American ass (if he can slip in under my grazing fire).
6th year PhD (Pile it Higher and Deeper) student? That's like being a 8th year BA student. Of course, he'll be just what we need. The last of a dying breed-a socialist with a PhD in political science. Jeff, practice saying "Do you to super size?" you worthless fuck. My 1st grader knows more about America than you do. "...and to the Republic, for which it stands....". Yeah, he knows we're not a democracy (or mobocracy, as it really is). We've had that talk. My 4th grader probably knows more about the entire Constitution than you do. Christ, Yale used to trun out great minds, not imbeciles who trash the greatest political document ever concieved by man (flawed as it is-damned Federalists). And he admits to having a psychological aversion to firearms. "A fear of firearms is a sign of retarded emotional and sexual development" Freud Hey Jeff, when you ban guns, don't be like Bush and send the poor and downtrodden off to fght your war, come yourself, to my doorstep, and try to take them, you pussy. |
|
But we are a independent democracy. Its the same thing as representative republic. Right?? cuz i just wrote a paper on our Constitution of civics class. |
||
|
|
|||
|
I never liked the term "representative republic" because a republic is by it's very nature representative. The United States of America should be more correctly referred to as a federal republic. I can only imagine how this guy and the rest of his "doctor" buddies would "rewrite" and "clarify" the Second Amendment...
The State Militia, as embodied by the State National Guard, shall have the right to bear arms. No thanks, college boy. |
|
There is nothing worng with changing the Constitution. Its been done many times.
They're called Amendments. This asshole just wants the legislature to ignore the constitution simply because he doesn't agree with it. |
|
Find it! |
|
|
I'm taking American History II down at our community college this semester and we had to devote our class time Monday because of this requirment. The instructor actually said this: "It has been mandated by the government we spend an entire class meeting discussing the Constitution (displeased smirk), I could think of better things we need to address but this is mandatory." Of course better things to her are how evil white people have been throughout history, FDR is the best president the US ever had, labor unions and socialism were unfairly repressed, and she must say the word progressive in at least every other sentence.
She went around the room and asked what everyone thought was the most important amendment. I was the only one that said the second, most of the little teenagers in there had to crack open the book to look at a list to find out what exactly each one was We spent the rest of the time on the Patriot Act, she said how it was wrong for the government to pay extra attention to Muslims and mosques in the war on terror and that was profiling. She asked what we thought about it and I said : "I guess it all depends on who's side your own" |
|
I am taking an online sociology class for my degree requirement and it is agonizing - I have simply stopped reading the text. It may as well be "Victimhood 101". I do not need to hear all of the drivel about how everyone is a victim except the white man because I've heard it all already.
|
|
I would have said the 9th or 10th amendment. |
|
|
I was going to say you were wrong, but you might be right. Because the 2nd Amendment is just "recognizing" an INALIENABLE Right of self defense and self determination. One, not to be transfered or Surrendered at any point. The 2nd Amendment doesn't give you that Right, like the 3rd Amendment doesn't allow soldiers to be quartered in your home...God gives you, your 2nd Amendment Rights. The Bill of Rights just states that fact and the fact that under invasion, it's our Right to defend our Homes, our States, and our Nation. But on the other hand, you could still be wrong, because...without the 2nd Amendment, you are not guaranteed any of the others. How are you going to defend your Rights if you don't have the INALIENABLE (not to be surrendered) Right of weaponry for the defense or yourself or your other Rights? |
||
|
The 10th sounds nice but haven't the SCOTUS rulings about interstate commerce made it meaningless ? I'm asking because I'm not really sure but that is the way I have understood it. Seems like they think everything is interstate commerce and that makes it the Feds business. |
||
|
It's only unclear when you have an irrational fear of guns, and want to ban them. |
|
|
...............against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
OK I think we can add this guy to the "domestic" list. |
|
But you miss the point. If this is what is taught in schools (it was in my case), this is what people will think. It doesn't matter if they're stupid or not, they're influencing minds. |
||
|
+1 We need more gun loving shooters teaching, in the medical professions, in the broadcast arts and as lawyers. If we all took control of these professions, we wouldn't have the problems that we face today. Liberals have infected and taken the majority of control of every job position that educates the public and our children. We need to take that from them. Cut off the ability to control the blatant lies the mass media puts out there and the blatant disinformation the teachers plant into the children and their "agenda" would fail and their control would fall to the wayside. Truth would come back to the minds of our children and maybe to the public at large. The "average" joe, believes what they hear on the TV. Just like reading a book, if it's in a book or on the TV, it must be true...so the average joe replies. |
|||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.