Posted: 12/31/2010 1:49:36 PM EDT
|
The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states.
Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. |
|
Quoted:
The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. Although this is true, in a literal and technical sense this IS chili, it still is NOT chili. It's not chili by the assumed definition of the majority of people. If they have an assumption chili is a thick sauce with meat but the meat is beef and the sauce is tomato based, well, when there are chili threads, they are expected to revolve at least partially around that premise. Although this looks delicious and I would likely enjoy it, it isn't going to be filed in with my "chili" recipes. For what it's worth I tend to think that red sauced chilis are gross when they contain beans, and that noodles enhance the chili, so I'm probably a minority here as well. |
|
Quoted: The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. WTF are you talking about? Texans know tomatoes, while arguably acceptable, are a non-standard ingredient in chili.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. Although this is true, in a literal and technical sense this IS chili, it still is NOT chili. It's not chili by the assumed definition of the majority of people. If they have an assumption chili is a thick sauce with meat but the meat is beef and the sauce is tomato based, well, when there are chili threads, they are expected to revolve at least partially around that premise. Although this looks delicious and I would likely enjoy it, it isn't going to be filed in with my "chili" recipes. For what it's worth I tend to think that red sauced chilis are gross when they contain beans, and that noodles enhance the chili, so I'm probably a minority here as well. You would think the Texans would know what Chili Verde (aka "Green Chili") is It's very tasty The ICS (International Chili Society) rules are: 1. Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. 2. Chili Verde is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked with green chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. |
|
Quoted: shit yeah, yall's barbecue sucks ass..we have the best Quoted: The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. WTF are you talking about? Texans know tomatoes, while arguably acceptable, are a non-standard ingredient in chili. ![]() |
|
Quoted: What, that wrong-meat shit you pour douche water on? Quoted: shit yeah, yall's barbecue sucks ass..we have the best Quoted: The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. WTF are you talking about? Texans know tomatoes, while arguably acceptable, are a non-standard ingredient in chili. ![]() |
|
Quoted: Quoted: What, that wrong-meat shit you pour douche water on? Quoted: shit yeah, yall's barbecue sucks ass..we have the best Quoted: The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. WTF are you talking about? Texans know tomatoes, while arguably acceptable, are a non-standard ingredient in chili. ![]() haha, damned right. nc barbecue FTMFW!
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. Although this is true, in a literal and technical sense this IS chili, it still is NOT chili. It's not chili by the assumed definition of the majority of people. If they have an assumption chili is a thick sauce with meat but the meat is beef and the sauce is tomato based, well, when there are chili threads, they are expected to revolve at least partially around that premise. Although this looks delicious and I would likely enjoy it, it isn't going to be filed in with my "chili" recipes. For what it's worth I tend to think that red sauced chilis are gross when they contain beans, and that noodles enhance the chili, so I'm probably a minority here as well. You would think the Texans would know what Chili Verde (aka "Green Chili") is It's very tasty The ICS (International Chili Society) rules are: 1. Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden.
2. Chili Verde is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked with green chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden.
I know both of the above... I was saying people saw this thread and didn't think chili verde. I also said I know that I'm the minority in thinking so, but prefer chili with no beans and with noodles. That's just how it is at my house. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What, that wrong-meat shit you pour douche water on? Quoted: shit yeah, yall's barbecue sucks ass..we have the best Quoted: The chili folk who think chili must have tomatoes are badly misinformed. Texans mostly...and people from places like Ohio, Maine and other third world states. Im gonna go have my first beer of the evening while you all sort this out in a nice to one another manner. WTF are you talking about? Texans know tomatoes, while arguably acceptable, are a non-standard ingredient in chili. ![]() haha, damned right. nc barbecue FTMFW! |












Texans know tomatoes, while arguably acceptable, are a non-standard ingredient in chili.
