Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 10/12/2004 4:48:17 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/12/2004 4:48:17 PM EDT by Hawkeye]
Please click on the following link and vote "yes" supporting a Tampa, Florida TV stations decesion to run a Anti-Kerry documentary called "Stolen Honor".

www.wtta38.com/tampa_fl/

Please take the time to vote and let all of your family and friends know about this poll.

Thank you...
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 2:08:42 PM EDT
Here are the current results... we need your help:

Do you think Sinclair Broadcast Group should run the documentary?

31% Yes
69% No

Link Posted: 10/12/2004 2:18:10 PM EDT



TELL US TONIGHT :

Do you think Sinclair Broadcast Group should run the documentary?



31% Yes
69% No


Link Posted: 10/12/2004 2:38:56 PM EDT
After waiting for the site to load (real slow for some reason ), all I'm getting above the "Submit" button is;

Could not connect to qod database: $db
Could not connect to qod database: $db

Surely ARFCOM can't swamp a comercial site like theirs . not by ourselves anyway.
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 2:46:46 PM EDT
Do you think Sinclair Broadcast Group should run the documentary?



30% Yes
70% No

Link Posted: 10/12/2004 2:48:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/12/2004 2:51:37 PM EDT by jnewt]
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 3:54:45 PM EDT
I dont support this decision either. Truth has already spoken, those that looks the other way will continue to do so.


Link Posted: 10/12/2004 4:01:09 PM EDT
Air it I say oh IBTL.
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 4:01:55 PM EDT
My view is a documentary is a documentary.
Michael Moores F911 is a twisted collection of half truths.
Certainly it will be broadcast at some point.
This is no different asside from the maker I am sure.
But the public has a right to see it as well as F911
It is freedom of speech if you don't want to watch it don't.
But I would like to see it. Likely it will not change my vote.
I already know who my candidate is. Moores dramitization
of the facts is no more likely to change that.
Though I refuse to pay him to see it.
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 4:12:32 PM EDT
Why shouldn't they run it? As long as it is factual, unlike Michael Moore's "taken out of context, distored sound bites" view, it should be aired. Sooner or later you guys will understand that turning the other cheek to someone who wants to take away your rights isn't the correct approach. Remember New Jersey's elections where the Dems substituted Laughtenberg at the last minute for Torricelli, a clear violation of the state's constitution? Didn't matter a bit to them. They did it anyway, and Laughtenberg is extremely anti-gun. You cannot reason or negotiate with people who do so in bad faith. If you like gun control, turn the other cheek like a gentleman and elect John Kerry ,and if you believe in fighting the game the way they do, air it. As the saying goes, "the gloves need to come off." You cannot fight a gentleman's game with scoundrels!
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 4:14:56 PM EDT
General forum down tonight?
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 4:21:13 PM EDT

Originally Posted By jnewt:
Cant really support that one my man, as much as I hate that sorry ass Kerry. What if one of the networks decide to show the Michael Moore F911? Should they be allowed to show it? Even though we know it is full of lies it just goes to show you how someone can take quotes and clips of videos and make them project anything they want. Even though they are all probably true regaurding Kerrys snake ass...lol...

How nice would it be if uncle sam sent packets containing 20 years of info on every politician you can vote on in your community? Real nice, then people could base there decisions on facts and not he said she said crap like most do today. All I know is Kerry would be up shit creek if something like that was sent out to every home.



Then let sKerry release the approximately 100 pages of his military records he has not released
Link Posted: 10/12/2004 4:42:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 10/12/2004 4:43:24 PM EDT by 45Colt]
The truth will set you free!
Link Posted: 10/13/2004 12:18:09 AM EDT
They've changed the question to "Should sKerry Respond?"
Link Posted: 10/13/2004 3:31:50 AM EDT
If George Soros and others can pump tens of millions of dollars into this campaign then I see no reason why Sinclair can't run a documentary on sKerry. In fact there is a hell of a lot more justification for allowing them to do it versus allowing Soros to do it.

Furthermore, are we going to stand for the Federal government censoring every bit of TV or radio because a candidate says they don't agree with it? As someone stated earlier, if you don't want to watch it turn the channel or turn off the TV. Try picking up a book and reading rather than vegging out in front of the boob toob.

As far as I am concerned, if it is running in my area, I am tuning in. I believe it will be high quality entertainment watching the libs afterwards blubbering and complaining.
Top Top