[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Please lock OP request. (Page 1 of 3)
Posted: 11/22/2008 9:51:44 PM EDT
|
I know they are the tip of the spear (or whatever quote you prefer) but every country has "veterans" and very few countries have anything close to Freedom.
The worst regimes in history all had "veterans". What make American veterans the ones to thank for America's Freedom? I do thank veterans for their service, and of course our freedoms would have been lost without their voluntary (and often involuntary) service, but I'm not sure I can give them credit for "giving" Americans our Freedom. How many of the Founding Fathers were combat veterans? I honestly think the Framers are the ones to thank for our Freedom. Giving veterans the credit for "giving us" our Freedom is dangerous because it fails to recognize the true source of America's Freedom. Guardians? Definitely. Providers? No. [This thread sprang from my own experience with those in .mil who hold the "collective" view of the Second Amendment and feel Americans have no Constitutional right to "militia" type arms (e.g. AR-15s).] |
Uh....maybe you skipped out on American History, but most of the Framers WERE combat vets!!! General Gerorge Washington ring a bell? And, the ones that might not have been on the battlefield were still wanted by the King as traitors. Many of them had their homes burned, family arrested or killed because of their rebellious status.
What the hell are you on man? |
|
Quoted:
Uh....maybe you skipped out on American History, but most of the Framers WERE combat vets!!! General Gerorge Washington ring a bell? And, the ones that might not have been on the battlefield were still wanted by the King as traitors. Many of them had their homes burned, family arrested or killed because of their rebellious status.
What the hell are you on man? Different time, different place, and different circumstances. The thinkers like Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franlin, Thomas Paine, and John Locke (not a founder, but our founders based their opinions largely on his second treatise of government) have done far more in securing freedom than any modern day veteran ever has. |
|
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. Why is that? I think he has a valid question. Should not the writer get as much credit as the soldier for securing our way of life? Without one there would not be the need for the other. |
|
Quoted:
The constitution doesn't mean much when we're all forced to speak German or Japanese, genius. And we wouldn't have had a revolution without the writer/thinker inspiring people to fight and having a reason to continue to do so. You can't compare the minutemen to soldiers of today. |
|
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. John Kerry, Jack Murtha, Jimmy Carter all veterans with very little thanks in route for my "freedom". Again, service is esssential to the preservation of freedom, but it does not necessarily result in freedom. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. Why is that? I think he has a valid question. Should not the writer get as much credit as the soldier for securing our way of life? Without one there would not be the need for the other. The author of this thread is a fucking idiot. Vets don't ask to be respected. We do what we do because we are Americans. Basic and simple. If you don't want to respect us, fair enough. Enjoy your rights at our expense. It's our pleasure. |
|
Quoted:
Your correct no comparison, educational level, training, equipment, and todays soldier isnt losing the majority of the battles they are in...But we also arnt fighting a better trained or equipped army, like the minutemen had to initially.
Quoted:
The constitution doesn't mean much when we're all forced to speak German or Japanese, genius. And we wouldn't have had a revolution without the writer/thinker inspiring people to fight and having a reason to continue to do so. You can't compare the minutemen to soldiers of today. |
|
Quoted:
..... OT....Did your realize that your avatar has nothing to do the National Rifle Association? It is the logo of Franklin Roosevelt's National Recovery Administration, a new deal program: From http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/fdr-fireside/ ...It also created the National Recovery Administration (NRA). The NRA was perhaps one of the most sweeping and controversial of the early New Deal programs. Its purposes were twofold: first, to stabilize business with codes of "fair" competitive practice and, second, to generate more purchasing power by providing jobs, defining labor standards, and raising wages. The NRA also reflected trade union hopes for protection of basic hour and wage standards and liberal hopes for comprehensive planning. General Hugh S. Johnson headed the NRA and eventually proposed a "blanket code" pledging employers generally to observe the same labor standards. By mid-July 1933 he launched a crusade to whip up popular support for the NRA and its symbol of compliance, the "Blue Eagle," with the motto "We do our part." The eagle, which had been modeled on an Indian thunderbird, was displayed in windows and stamped on products to show a business's compliance. There was even a parade down New York's Fifth Avenue with over a quarter of a million marchers in September to show support for the NRA and the "Blue Eagle."
While developing programs to help America emerge from the Great Depression, Roosevelt also needed to calm the fears and restore the confidence of Americans and to gain their support for the programs of the New Deal, including the NRA. One of the ways FDR chose to accomplish this was through the radio, the most direct means of access to the American people. During the 1930s almost every home had a radio, and families typically spent several hours a day gathered together, listening to their favorite programs. Roosevelt called his radio talks about issues of public concern "Fireside Chats." Informal and relaxed, the talks made Americans feel as if President Roosevelt was talking directly to them. Roosevelt continued to use fireside chats throughout his presidency to address the fears and concerns of the American people as well as to inform them of the positions and actions taken by the U.S. government. The topic of this lesson's featured document, Fireside Chat on the Purposes and Foundations of the Recovery Program, was the NRA. Although this radio message, given on July 24, 1933, addressed some of the problems and issues of the Great Depression, it also focused on what industry, employers, and workers could do to bring about economic recovery. For a time, the NRA worked. It gave an air of confidence to the American people to overcome the fears of the Depression and the downward turn of wages and prices. However, once recovery began, hostility among businessmen grew with the daily annoyances of code enforcement. Within two years the NRA had developed many critics and by May 1935 was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional. The experiment of the NRA was generally put down as a failure. Nevertheless, the codes had set new standards for business and workers such as the 40-hour week and the end of child labor. The NRA also helped the growth of unions with the endorsement of collective bargaining. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. Why is that? I think he has a valid question. Should not the writer get as much credit as the soldier for securing our way of life? Without one there would not be the need for the other. The author of this thread is a fucking idiot. Vets don't ask to be respected. We do what we do because we are Americans. Basic and simple. If you don't want to respect us, fair enough. Enjoy your rights at our expense. It's our pleasure. You're talking to one...and I still have yet to see how being in 140+ countries around the world is defending the values and ideals this country was founded upon. I don't expect nor do I deserve thanks for anything above anyone else. |
|
Quoted:
I know they are the tip of the spear (or whatever quote you prefer) but every country has "veterans" and very few countries have anything close to Freedom. It is implied that you should thanks US veterans, unless you are reading this bumper sticker in Germany or something. Duh. Go read "Sophistry for Dummies" and get back to us. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
..... OT....Did your realize that your avatar has nothing to do the National Rifle Association? It is the logo of Franklin Roosevelt's National Recovery Administration, a new deal program: From http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/fdr-fireside/ ...It also created the National Recovery Administration (NRA). The NRA was perhaps one of the most sweeping and controversial of the early New Deal programs. Its purposes were twofold: first, to stabilize business with codes of "fair" competitive practice and, second, to generate more purchasing power by providing jobs, defining labor standards, and raising wages. The NRA also reflected trade union hopes for protection of basic hour and wage standards and liberal hopes for comprehensive planning. General Hugh S. Johnson headed the NRA and eventually proposed a "blanket code" pledging employers generally to observe the same labor standards. By mid-July 1933 he launched a crusade to whip up popular support for the NRA and its symbol of compliance, the "Blue Eagle," with the motto "We do our part." The eagle, which had been modeled on an Indian thunderbird, was displayed in windows and stamped on products to show a business's compliance. There was even a parade down New York's Fifth Avenue with over a quarter of a million marchers in September to show support for the NRA and the "Blue Eagle."
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/fdr-fireside/images/blue-eagle.gif While developing programs to help America emerge from the Great Depression, Roosevelt also needed to calm the fears and restore the confidence of Americans and to gain their support for the programs of the New Deal, including the NRA. One of the ways FDR chose to accomplish this was through the radio, the most direct means of access to the American people. During the 1930s almost every home had a radio, and families typically spent several hours a day gathered together, listening to their favorite programs. Roosevelt called his radio talks about issues of public concern "Fireside Chats." Informal and relaxed, the talks made Americans feel as if President Roosevelt was talking directly to them. Roosevelt continued to use fireside chats throughout his presidency to address the fears and concerns of the American people as well as to inform them of the positions and actions taken by the U.S. government. The topic of this lesson's featured document, Fireside Chat on the Purposes and Foundations of the Recovery Program, was the NRA. Although this radio message, given on July 24, 1933, addressed some of the problems and issues of the Great Depression, it also focused on what industry, employers, and workers could do to bring about economic recovery. For a time, the NRA worked. It gave an air of confidence to the American people to overcome the fears of the Depression and the downward turn of wages and prices. However, once recovery began, hostility among businessmen grew with the daily annoyances of code enforcement. Within two years the NRA had developed many critics and by May 1935 was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional. The experiment of the NRA was generally put down as a failure. Nevertheless, the codes had set new standards for business and workers such as the 40-hour week and the end of child labor. The NRA also helped the growth of unions with the endorsement of collective bargaining.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. Why is that? I think he has a valid question. Should not the writer get as much credit as the soldier for securing our way of life? Without one there would not be the need for the other. The author of this thread is a fucking idiot. Vets don't ask to be respected. We do what we do because we are Americans. Basic and simple. If you don't want to respect us, fair enough. Enjoy your rights at our expense. It's our pleasure. You're talking to one...and I still have yet to see how being in 140+ countries around the world is defending the values and ideals this country was founded upon. I don't expect nor do I deserve thanks for anything above anyone else. Technically I'm a vet, albeit non-combat, and I've yet to think for one moment I was the safe-guard of freedom just from being in the military. |
|
Quoted:
I think the biggest thing is Vietnam and S. Korea as part of the cold war, defending our freedom from communism. I just can't see the Nazis or Japs ever trying to invade the US but I can definitely see the Soviets doing it. We went to fight some communists but played nice with other communists at the same time; our 'enemy' is whoever currently stands in the way of our self-interests. |
|
I'm a vet, for the record I froze my ass off on the DMZ to protect, well mostly the freedom of the Koreans. A lot of vets never froze their ass off, a lot of vets sat on their asses in an office, a lot of vets worked 9-5 jobs at places like Eglin AFB (basically living where I go to vacation) Or Keesler AFB (where I was away from while I was freezing my ass off.) But then again, some vets ride down roads in Iraq at risk of losing their life from IEDs every day or charged up Hamburger hill and things like that. Point is, "vet" doesn't mean much to me. A lot of vets have done more than me, and a lot more have done less... some haven't contributed more to this nation's freedoms than the average taxpayer. I think the rush to thank vets is a little silly. Guy on ARFCOM posts that he decided to join up, well good for you, there will be 50 posts thanking him for his service, WTF at least wait until he's done with training.
I wish I could send some socks to the guys at Valley Forge or have stood with the men at the Old North Bridge. And I would love to meet Thomas Jefferson... the only downside would be having to tell him what has become of America. I would love to have a beer with Ben Franklin I hear he was great to have a beer with. I would love to sit down and hear wahington tell the story of the revolution. I'd love to help Thomas Paine make a youtube vid about the modern world. Those were the people who gave us our freedom. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think the biggest thing is Vietnam and S. Korea as part of the cold war, defending our freedom from communism. I just can't see the Nazis or Japs ever trying to invade the US but I can definitely see the Soviets doing it. We went to fight some communists but played nice with other communists at the same time; our 'enemy' is whoever currently stands in the way of our self-interests. Yep. Also... shitstorm ahead. |
|
Quoted:
I'm a vet, for the record I froze my ass off on the DMZ to protect, well mostly the freedom of the Koreans. Allot of vets never froze their ass off, a lot of vets sat on their asses in an office, a lot of vets worked 9-5 jobs at places like Eglin AFB (basically living where I go to vacation) Or Keesler AFB (where I was away from while I was freezing my ass off.) But then again, some vets ride down roads in Iraq at risk of losing their life from IEDs every day or charged of Hamburger hill and things like that. Point is, "vet" doesn't mean much to me. Allot of vets have done more than me, and a lot more have done less... some haven't contributed more to this nation's freedoms than the average taxpayer. I think the rush to thank vets is a little silly. Guy on ARFCOM posts that he decided to join up, well good for you, there will be 50 posts thanking him for his service, WTF at least wait until he's done with training. I wish I could send some socks to the guys at Valley Forge or have stood with the men at the Old North Bridge. And I would love to meet Thomas Jefferson... the only downside would be having to tell him what has become of America. I would love to have a beer with Ben Franklin I beer he was great to have a beer with. I would love to sit down and heer wahington tell the story of the revolution. I'd love to help Thomas Paine make a youtube vid about the modern world. Those were the people who gave us our freedom. This is a very good post. Thanks for that. edit: From one of those guys who sat in an office
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. John Kerry, Jack Murtha, Jimmy Carter all veterans with very little thanks in route for my "freedom". Again, service is essential to the preservation of freedom, but it does not necessarily result in freedom. I'm thankful to those that serve but ideas are more powerful than men with guns. Men may die but ideas are immortal. |
|
Quoted:
You're talking to one...and I still have yet to see how being in 140+ countries around the world is defending the values and ideals this country was founded upon. I never said every Vet was smart either. If you can't understand the world then I can't help you. I appreciate your service and will continue mine with honor and competency. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're talking to one...and I still have yet to see how being in 140+ countries around the world is defending the values and ideals this country was founded upon. I never said every Vet was smart either. If you can't understand the world then I can't help you. I appreciate your service and will continue mine with honor and competency. Clear the tracks, the arrogance train is coming and the brakes are out! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're talking to one...and I still have yet to see how being in 140+ countries around the world is defending the values and ideals this country was founded upon. I never said every Vet was smart either. If you can't understand the world then I can't help you. I appreciate your service and will continue mine with honor and competency. I understand how the world works, and that is why I say that the majority of our enemies are simply those who currently stand in the way of our own self-interest...not because they 'hate our freedom' or whatever other childlike phrase is constantly spouted off by our politicians and pundits. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Do you believe our Constitution would be in Baghdad museum if it wasn't for OIF? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Exactly. My statement contained both points and WHY our veterans will always be among the most important beings in the history man. IF Liberty survives into the future. Because if it does, it will be because of the success of the American experiment. If it does not, it will be because we failed. Veterans do not determine, internally, whether or not that experiment succeeds (per se, as every citizen is important to its success). What they DO is protect the CHANCE for the experiment to succeed. Without that, all the philosophers, writers, and thinkers in the world could not save Liberty. |
|
The reason we honor veterans is this:
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. and this: For even those who come short in other ways may justly plead the valor with which they have fought for their country; they have blotted out the evil with the good
if you are not familiar with the second quotation, it is Pericles' Funeral Oration, as recorded by Thucydides in 'The Peloponnesian War'. I suggest you read the entire passage, it's a little longer than I wanted to quote here, but I think you may find that America is not alone in honoring veterans for providing liberty or even, in this case, Democracy. Not every veteran is or was a hero. They are certainly not the only people responsible for our freedoms. But every one of them has promised to give his or life in their defense, and quite a few have fulfilled that promise. The Founding Fathers, as you say, promised, and indeed, signed, their lives and fortunes to freedom's cause, but without the Continental Army, they would simply have been hanged as traitors. Our good fortune is that our Army has always served the elected government (if not the people) and that is something few other nations can say. Maybe just this simple fact alone should be enough, though I am constantly surprised by how few people realize that the fact that our Army has never overthrown our government is, by historical standards, unprecedented. So yes, every country has veterans, but you would probably be surprised by how few other countries respect them as we do ours. |
|
At first this thread pissed me off, but I cooled off and I will answer you rationally.
The idea behind thanking the US military for our freedom is that our strong national defense has kept foreign armies, who are not friendly to liberty away and allow the rest of America to exist in a bubble of peace and tranquility. Make sense now? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Exactly. My statement contained both points and WHY our veterans will always be among the most important beings in the history man. IF Liberty survives into the future. Because if it does, it will be because of the success of the American experiment. If it does not, it will be because we failed. Veterans do not determine, internally, whether or not that experiment succeeds (per se, as every citizen is important to its success). What they DO is protect the CHANCE for the experiment to succeed. Without that, all the philosophers, writers, and thinkers in the world could not save Liberty. And, hypothetically, what should our military be used for evil purposes in the future (and as history shows time and time again, it will be?) |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Do you believe our Constitution would be in Baghdad museum if it wasn't for OIF? I think the National Archives would be pretty pissed. No, I don't believe that, it's probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're talking to one...and I still have yet to see how being in 140+ countries around the world is defending the values and ideals this country was founded upon. I never said every Vet was smart either. If you can't understand the world then I can't help you. I appreciate your service and will continue mine with honor and competency. Clear the tracks, the arrogance train is coming and the brakes are out! Choo choo!!!! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Do you believe our Constitution would be in Baghdad museum if it wasn't for OIF? Start another thread if you want to get schooled on geopolitics. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Do you believe our Constitution would be in Baghdad museum if it wasn't for OIF? I think the National Archives would be pretty pissed. No, I don't believe that, it's probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. It would also be the most embarrassing thing that has ever happened
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
..... OT....Did your realize that your avatar has nothing to do the National Rifle Association? It is the logo of Franklin Roosevelt's National Recovery Administration, a new deal program: From http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/fdr-fireside/ ...It also created the National Recovery Administration (NRA). The NRA was perhaps one of the most sweeping and controversial of the early New Deal programs. Its purposes were twofold: first, to stabilize business with codes of "fair" competitive practice and, second, to generate more purchasing power by providing jobs, defining labor standards, and raising wages. The NRA also reflected trade union hopes for protection of basic hour and wage standards and liberal hopes for comprehensive planning. General Hugh S. Johnson headed the NRA and eventually proposed a "blanket code" pledging employers generally to observe the same labor standards. By mid-July 1933 he launched a crusade to whip up popular support for the NRA and its symbol of compliance, the "Blue Eagle," with the motto "We do our part." The eagle, which had been modeled on an Indian thunderbird, was displayed in windows and stamped on products to show a business's compliance. There was even a parade down New York's Fifth Avenue with over a quarter of a million marchers in September to show support for the NRA and the "Blue Eagle."
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/fdr-fireside/images/blue-eagle.gif While developing programs to help America emerge from the Great Depression, Roosevelt also needed to calm the fears and restore the confidence of Americans and to gain their support for the programs of the New Deal, including the NRA. One of the ways FDR chose to accomplish this was through the radio, the most direct means of access to the American people. During the 1930s almost every home had a radio, and families typically spent several hours a day gathered together, listening to their favorite programs. Roosevelt called his radio talks about issues of public concern "Fireside Chats." Informal and relaxed, the talks made Americans feel as if President Roosevelt was talking directly to them. Roosevelt continued to use fireside chats throughout his presidency to address the fears and concerns of the American people as well as to inform them of the positions and actions taken by the U.S. government. The topic of this lesson's featured document, Fireside Chat on the Purposes and Foundations of the Recovery Program, was the NRA. Although this radio message, given on July 24, 1933, addressed some of the problems and issues of the Great Depression, it also focused on what industry, employers, and workers could do to bring about economic recovery. For a time, the NRA worked. It gave an air of confidence to the American people to overcome the fears of the Depression and the downward turn of wages and prices. However, once recovery began, hostility among businessmen grew with the daily annoyances of code enforcement. Within two years the NRA had developed many critics and by May 1935 was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional. The experiment of the NRA was generally put down as a failure. Nevertheless, the codes had set new standards for business and workers such as the 40-hour week and the end of child labor. The NRA also helped the growth of unions with the endorsement of collective bargaining. ![]() Fucking Google Images! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Exactly. My statement contained both points and WHY our veterans will always be among the most important beings in the history man. IF Liberty survives into the future. Because if it does, it will be because of the success of the American experiment. If it does not, it will be because we failed. Veterans do not determine, internally, whether or not that experiment succeeds (per se, as every citizen is important to its success). What they DO is protect the CHANCE for the experiment to succeed. Without that, all the philosophers, writers, and thinkers in the world could not save Liberty. And, hypothetically, what should our military be used for evil purposes in the future (and as history shows time and time again, it will be?) Huh? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. Why is that? I think he has a valid question. Should not the writer get as much credit as the soldier for securing our way of life? Without one there would not be the need for the other. no no, you miss my point.... I am basing it off the natural reactions of ARFCOMMERS.. I will say that during our process and struggle for independence both the writer and the fighter were equally as important. now days all we have it seems is the fighter, as the writers only work towards derailing our freedoms. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OP: Because our veterans fight for the sacred fire of Liberty as protected politically through our Constitution. Others don't. And would that 'sacred fire' be there without the writer/thinker/philosopher? Without vets our Constitution would be in a German museum, but...and this is the key point...without the founders, we would have no Constitution. Exactly. My statement contained both points and WHY our veterans will always be among the most important beings in the history man. IF Liberty survives into the future. Because if it does, it will be because of the success of the American experiment. If it does not, it will be because we failed. Veterans do not determine, internally, whether or not that experiment succeeds (per se, as every citizen is important to its success). What they DO is protect the CHANCE for the experiment to succeed. Without that, all the philosophers, writers, and thinkers in the world could not save Liberty. And, hypothetically, what should our military be used for evil purposes in the future (and as history shows time and time again, it will be?) Huh? So should that happen, we would only thank certain vets? Or would we then thank those who resisted? Who would we thank then? What I'm saying is, while our military plays a vital role, this blanket "Defenders of Freedom" label is really an insult, and it's patronizing. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
this thread has the potential to expand on the display of idiocy. Why is that? I think he has a valid question. Should not the writer get as much credit as the soldier for securing our way of life? Without one there would not be the need for the other. no no, you miss my point.... I am basing it off the natural reactions of ARFCOMMERS.. I will say that during our process and struggle for independence both the writer and the fighter were equally as important. now days all we have it seems is the fighter, as the writers only work towards derailing our freedoms. Roger that. |
General Gerorge Washington ring a bell? And, the ones that might not have been on the battlefield were still wanted by the King as traitors. Many of them had their homes burned, family arrested or killed because of their rebellious status.

