Posted: 12/23/2008 1:18:05 AM EDT
|
I on a tangent right now. I got flashed today for taking a left hand turn on a yellow light. Arizona is flooded with these fucking cameras. So much to the point that it can interfere with my work. (I drive an Ambo.)
First question: Napolitiano loves these because it generates revenue, but onw has to wonder how much stock did she buy into redflex before giving the ok. Second question: Was the ok given on a national level "insider trading maybe" that the gov. is going to give the ok for this company sole right to burn the public. Third: Can this some how conflict with the forth amendment? And Forth: How many Arfcommer's actually support this kind of enforcement? And fifth: This is my own opinion here talking...does the gov. like using separate corp. because if things go wrong the can shift the blame and if things go right they can collect on what ever money can be made? |
|
You just know all that crap is crooked . The cameras are cheaper than cops . It's going to get much,much worse.(they are litterally making millions in profit after paying the lease on those cameras)
You should check out how many people make thier living on DUI's. there are 2 companies that do nothing but rent out the mandatory breathalizers.($ 300+ 75 bucks per month for a year ) about 6 that handle the mandatory counciling. (@ 500 bucks + per pop ) MADD gets a cut as well.( 50 bucks each , mandatory ) Another company that does the home unit breathalizer for repeat offenders .( some stupid amount+ the cost of a land line ) If DUI's actually ever went away completely , there would be a whole grip of people out of work. Defensive driving classes , anger management classes , random drug testing , ....ect. Now we have that asshat trying to push the serial numbered bullet bullshit , cause he owns the technology and stands to make billions. All the above and many more , have just figured out a way to fleece a large segment of the population under the color of law , and with government as their "collection" gimp. |