To preface this discussion: I've just finished discussing philosophy with a girl and she is an adamant proponent of relativity.
I understand the, I believe, leftist philosophy of relativity: as long as a plurality of individuals assume a certain stance on an issue, it will become a relative truth until said plurality changes. Then the person that I was talking to stated that she "didn't care" about other peoples ideas and ethics because they were their own. I find both relative truths and an apathy to other's opinions abhorent. On the subject of relative truths, I believe that there are absolute and perfect truths/doctrine that are held as universal ideals created by a supreme entity, God. I believe that these "Absolute Truths", taken as a whole, present a perfect and entire doctrine that, if they were able to be followed, would result in the moral righteousness of the individual. However, I assert, as did Plato, that these Absolute Truths are not clearly evident to man, that we simply mimick these truths much like "shadow images on a cave wall". I believe that our conscience, unlike many "Mental Environmentalists", although subject to influence by its surroundings, is embedded with a sense of "ethical correctness" that we know to be true. I think that the "peace of mind" or "moral obligation" of an individual is fulfilled not by that person's ability to be absolutely moral all the time, but in the effort put forth by that individual to emulate these imperfect Relative Truths formed by being copies of Absolute Truths.
On the subject of apathy towards others opinion. I understand that it is the right of every individual to hold their own opinion. However, I believe that the most powerful force that an individual has is persusasion. Persuasion, regardless of its form, although I believe persuasion without violence is most effective unlike Machiavelli, is the ability to make one's world more amiable and lovely to ones self. I do not contest that everyone should be able to hold their own opinions, however, I believe that it is my right to persuade others to hold ideas congruent with mine and my constituents because my world is then made more amiable. This is analogous to segregation in the 40s, note that I do not believe in segregation. Segregration allowed whites, and I believe blacks, to live more at ease in with individual's of their own race because they felt more comfortable and natural. It is the same with similiar ideologies. Why not try and persuade your enemies to be your friends rather than fight them? This is not a correlation, however, to the war on terrorism which I believe is a wholly justified war. I think this is much like a police officer relating to teenage and maleable individuals that they shouldn't commit acts that are violent or risky to police officers because police officers are the individuals that protect them from murders, thieves, etc.
Flame on.
-----
"An army of principles will penetrate where an army of soldiers cannot... it will march on the horizon of the world, and it will conquer." - Thomas Paine