Posted: 7/31/2017 6:11:32 AM EDT
Bofors 40mm AA gun. Machine gun or destructive device?
|
|
Quoted:
Yes like an integrally suppressed machine gun such as an MP5SD, a fully automatic destructive device requires two stamps. In this example, it's just the bore diameter, right? Wtf? I would think the fact that it is a machinegun would be enough regulation. |
|
Quoted:
That doesn't make sense. In your example, there are two separate features equating to a 2 stamp gun. In this example, it's just the bore diameter, right? Wtf? I would think the fact that it is a machinegun would be enough regulation. Some categories trump the other. If you have a 10.5 MG, you do not have a SBR and a MG, its simply a MG as a MG trumps the SBR status. Same thing for AOW such as a MP5K that's put into one of those briefcases, since its a MG, it trumps the AOW status |
. Chalk or otherwise the inert non explodey kind, meh.
|
Quoted:
It's a machine gun, but in cases where state law also restricts DDs you would be subject to those requirements as well. One stamp. MP5SDs are two different devices, not at all the same scenario. Example- IIRC, a full auto USAS12 would be a MG, while a semi auto would be a DD. |