When it comes to "State's Rights" I don't think they should [i]ever[/i] override our fundamental right to arms.
If the Second Amendment protection of the right to arms was incorporated under the "priveledges and immunities" clause of the 14th Amendment against state infringement like every other "right of the people" in the Bill of Rights, Morton Grove and Washington D.C. and Chicago wouldn't have handgun bans.
California and New York wouldn't have assault rifle bans.
No state would prohibit possession of Class III firearms.
In short, the entire country would have one set of rules when it came to the right to arms - the Federal set.
As it is, the right to arms remains the [i]ONLY[/i] right of the people enumerated under the Bill of Rights not incorporated. For christ's sake, even the [i]Third[/i] Amendment had an Appeals Court decision incorporating it.
State's Rights is great, but not when it comes to screwing with our [i]fundamental enumerated rights[/i].