[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M4-gery. Why?

Posted: 7/15/2001 7:46:48 PM EDT

I am just curious.

Is there any REAL benefit to the cost in making an M4-gery or is it purely asthetics?

There doesn't seem to be any benefit over, say, a Bushmaster 16" flat-top A3. Yet they seem to be the end all be all of AR's they way I see pics and such floating about.

Is there anything here other than looks?

(this has nothing to do with prebans)

zaz

Posted: 7/16/2001 6:58:32 AM EDT

[#1]

I'd say that the Bushmaster XM14 M4 Type Post Ban Carbine is a M4gery. Would be more original with 14,5" Barrel and real Tele-Stock but...it looks more like a M4 than a 20" AR15 w/fixed carry handle...

Posted: 7/16/2001 7:00:44 AM EDT

[#2]

sorry...XM15 M4 Type...

Posted: 7/16/2001 9:13:06 AM EDT

[#3]

With a postban, it [b]is[/b] purely aesthetic.

That's why I didn't go crazy over the LEGP. A fine rifle mechanically, but I do not like the neutered postban m4gery look.

Posted: 7/16/2001 9:35:48 AM EDT

[#4]

What Bud said, EXACTLY. I could think of much more useful configurations.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M4-gery. Why?

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M4-gery. Why?

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - M4-gery. Why?