I wouldn't go with 98 either. Seriously. Run NT4 or Windows 2000 Pro if you need something "old" but, how old is old? I've run XP Pro on this laptop before and it's hardly a speed demon. Pentium-III 1.2GHz, 256MB.
I ran Windows 2000 Pro on everything all the way back to my K6-2 350MHz. If your machine is at least that fast, just don't do Windows 9x. Seriously. Every time somebody boots up a Win-9x box, baby Jesus cries.. right before he crashes in a 16bit nightmare.
Now, a link for all the "X-haters" like me, even those of us that use it daily are haters. Read on kids, read on. ;)
A chapter from the book "The Unix Haters Handbook"
The X-Windows DisasterAnd an excerpt just to get you started..
How to make a 50-MIPS Workstation Run Like a 4.77MHz IBM PC
If the designers of X-Windows built cars, there would be no fewer than five steering wheels hidden about the cockpit, none of which followed the same principles -- but you'd be able to shift gears with your car stereo. Useful feature, that.
- Marus J. Ranum, Digital Equipment Corporation
X-Windows is the Iran-Contra of graphical user interfaces: a tragedy of political compromises, entangled alliances, marketing hype, and just plain greed. X-Windows is to memory as Ronald Reagan was to money. Years of "Voodoo Ergonomics" have resulted in an unprecedented memory deficit of gargantuan proportions. Divisive dependencies, distributed deadlocks, and partisan protocols have tightened gridlocks, aggravated race conditions, and promulgated double standards.
X has had its share of $5,000 toilet seats -- like Sun's Open Look clock tool, which gobbles up 1.4 megabytes of real memory! If you sacrificed all the RAM from 22 Commodore 64s to clock tool, it still wouldn't have enough to tell you the time. Even the vanilla X11R4 "xclock" utility consumed 656K to run. And X's memory usage is increasing.
|