Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/11/2007 10:33:12 AM EDT
After doing a Google search still the answer to my question is not solidly formed.
What are early indications that a Supervisor or Manager has reached their level of incompetence?
By your experiences, regardless of the size the organization.
Misc
10/11/2007 10:39:02 AM EDT
[#1]
Anybody?
10/11/2007 10:42:25 AM EDT
[#2]
Check out the book The Peter Principle by L. Peter

"The Peter Principle is a colloquial principle of hierarchiology , stated as "In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence."

10/11/2007 10:42:52 AM EDT
[#3]
the day you meet them?

10/11/2007 10:43:55 AM EDT
[#4]
In general, generalizations suck  
10/11/2007 10:45:12 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
In general, generalizations suck  


But they are generally correct.
10/11/2007 10:45:32 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
In general, generalizations suck  


But they are generally correct.



yes, generally speaking
10/11/2007 11:00:41 AM EDT
[#7]
 A Supervisor or Managers level of incompetence is in direct relation to that of who they manage / supervise.
 The best Manager in the world will look like crap if all his people are 'incompetent', but, the worst manager will look fairly good if his people are 'competent'.
10/11/2007 11:05:26 AM EDT
[#8]
Sometimes a person can be promoted beyond his level of incompetence.  In an organization where people are hard to fire a person can be promoted and laterally moved as a means of getting rid of that person.  This is especially true if the person is a member of a protected class.
10/11/2007 1:13:53 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Sometimes a person can be promoted beyond his level of incompetence.  In an organization where people are hard to fire a person can be promoted and laterally moved as a means of getting rid of that person.  This is especially true if the person is a member of a protected class.


Do you work for the .gov?  The circumstance you describe seems to be the current norm, there.
10/11/2007 11:45:56 PM EDT
[#10]
One good sign is when they screw stuff up and then puff about their success in the matter.
The key here is when they don't recognize their own incompetence -- can't conceive that they might be wrong about something, ever.  

Often this is accompanied by excessive confidence and rapid-fire conversation.

Micromanaging on stuff they theoretically have delegated (as opposed to checking in occasionally to monitor progress) is another bad omen.

If you see signs that they do not listen well, beware.

Claims that they are strictly a "big picture", "idea" person and can not be bothered with details when the situation calls for details.

Excessive use of buzzwords and trite, trendy, 'cutting edge' management phrases.

Prone to accuse you of insubordination when you suggest a good reason to do something a different way, or when there is a legitimate, over-riding, concern that may make it unwise to do what they say.

"Pulling rank" when there is no need to.

Fails to give credit to those who come up with a good idea or other success; appropriates same for their own benefit.

Oversimplification of work that truly is complex -- you hear "This is a slam dunk," when it's recognizably going to be a major time sink.

Won't stand up for their people, can't stand conflict.  Never finds spine to speak frankly with their own superior about a questionable directive given them.


10/12/2007 1:01:18 AM EDT
[#11]
Dilbert