I caught a bit of the debate tonight and O'Bamama states that he was the right person to lead our country and make the necessary changes in Washington, because the changes need to happen from the bottom upward..and he could lead that change....
Now, I have worked for several major companies, all of which are successful. Not a single CEO was successful leading those companies with a bottoms up approach, in fact the successful most successful CEOs would say a bottoms up approach in not leadership at all.
With that said....how in gods name can O'bamama make the case for being able to lead this country when his method , depends on the momentum being driven from the bottom of the food chain. Is he really that dim, or was he trying to be creative...and just forgot some bits?