Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What do you get with an $800 AK that you don't get with a $400 AK?
Do you have an answer?
A better AK?
ETA: Pick up a WASR and an Arsenal and look at them side by side. It's a much nicer rifle, parts fit better, finish is better, more accurate. for some people that's worth the extra $400.
I'll expand on that- from front to back-
Non-canted front sight post.
A real finish on the barrel and other exterior parts.
Better rivet work.
High quality furniture, not cheapo plastic or unfinished wood.
Aligned gas block.
Properly installed rear sight.
An actual double stack, dimpled AK receiver.
Quality US FCG.
Aligned scope rail.
Did I miss anything?
So I take it Arsenal un-fucked the HUGE quality control issues they were having, ones that included JUST ABOUT everything you listed?
I was an AK owner when that went down, I remember the resulting shitstorm.
I went from AK's to AR's, myself. I'm no expert, but I know enough to be annoying
.
All things being equal, I would take a $350.00-$400.00 Romainian WASR that I personally inspected over a much more expensive
AK any day of the week. An Arsenal or whatever high-dollar AK is no more reliable, or accurate, than a WASR costing half as much.
If a pretty finish, plastic furniture and a dimpled receiver makes you happy, fine. But DON't tell me it is more reliable, or more accurate.
They are AK's, folks, NOT repeat NOT AR's.
I myself would buy a Henderson Defence "guaranteed" AK for $425.00(ballpark for a stamped receiver) and not look back.