Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 6/30/2003 11:13:56 PM EDT
Sorry if this has already been posted. This came trough Insights list- brilliant text IMHO:

[i]Ralph Peters, writing for the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung, bids adieu to America's former allies France and Germany, in a
scathing indictment of ''Old Europe.''  The article came out on May 15, and
reportedly got more responses than any previous article in the newspaper's
history.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

AU REVOIR, MARIANNE...AUF WIEDERSEHEN, LILI MARLEEN The End of America's European Romance

By Ralph Peters


Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, May 15, 2003


The societies of ''Old Europe'' remind Americans of the Arab Street.
Preferring comforting delusions to challenging realities, Europeans talk a
great deal, do very little, and blame the United States for home-grown ills.

    The recent chants in the boulevards of Berlin were almost
indistinguishable from those heard-until recently--in downtown Baghdad.
Europe's culture of complaint, its enthusiasm for accusing America of every
wickedness while assigning every virtue to itself, and its stunning lack of
self-examination leave Americans bewildered.

    We thought you were adults, but, from across the Atlantic, you look
like spoiled children.  And your recent tantrums have convinced Big Daddy
America to deposit you on the steps of the strategic orphanage.

    The damage done by the recent confrontation between The United States
and those nations whose vocabularies collapsed to the single words ''Nein!''
or ''Non!'' will be repaired-on the surface.  We shall continue to cooperate
on matters of mutual interest.  But, on a deeper level, the exuberantly
dishonest attacks on America heard from France and Germany (Belgium simply
doesn't count), along with the shameless grandstanding of Mr. Schroeder and
Mr. Chirac, appear to even the most pragmatic Americans as grounds for
divorce from our long marriage of convenience.

    The divorce is long overdue.  Ignoring ''Old Europe'' on questions of
grand strategy will liberate the United States, freeing us at last from the
failed European model of diplomacy that has given the world so many hideous
wars, dysfunctional borders and undisturbed dictators.  The recent mischief
wrought in Paris and Berlin has enabled Washington to escape a long thrall
of enchantment, a slumber of sorts during which America allowed Europe's
ghost to haunt its decisions.

    Now you have awakened us, and we see that Europe's influence was
nothing but a legacy of nightmares.  We shall no longer subscribe to your
bloodsoaked, corrupt rules for the international system, but will forge our
own.  You will not like many of our new rules.  But to paraphrase Frederick
the Great's remark about Maria Theresia, you will cry, but take your share
of any available spoils.

    As a result of a series of remarkable strategic miscalculations, France
and Germany have lost their international footing-not only with the USA, but
with the world.  You had your moment in the anti-American sun.  High noon
revealed you as powerless and inept.

    For Germany, this divorce will offer some advantages.  American combat
forces soon will begin to leave German soil permanently, followed in good
time by our logistics facilities, which are simply more difficult to shift.
This will be to Germany's benefit practically and psychologically--and very
much to the benefit of America's armed forces, which have become nothing but
a cash cow for greedy organizations ranging from your railways to your labor
unions.

    NATO will survive, of course.  Along with the European Union, it's an
indispensable employment agency for Europe's excess bureaucrats.  But other
bilateral and multilateral military arrangements will take precedence in
Washington's strategic calculations.

    On the negative side, Germany will lose almost all of its diplomatic
influence beyond continental Europe-and Berlin never had much, at least
since 1945.  The world will take your Euros, but will not take you
seriously.

    You have asserted your independence from America.  Now you have it.

    Good luck.

    We won our war, easily, despite your protests and without your help.
And do not flatter yourself with rhetoric about refusing to be America's
vassals.  No one in the United States questioned Germany's right to decide
for itself whether or not to support our efforts to depose Saddam Hussein.
Germany had every right to decline to participate.  But it was the way you
did it that infuriated us.

    Bundeskanzler Schroeder astonished us.  We long had recognized him as a
political charlatan, but the extent of his demagogy and his amateurish
inability to foresee the consequences of his ranting still came as a
surprise to us.  We see Mr. Schroeder as a man utterly without convictions-a
man without qualities--a political animal so debased that he resembles no
one so much as he does European caricatures of small-time American
politicians.  His opportunistic anti-Americanism seemed all for effect,
without substance or genuine belief.

    Yet, in other respects, Schroeder proved quintessentially European: He
criticized, but failed to offer meaningful solutions of his own.  He chose
slogans over ideas, convenience over ethics, and portrayed small-minded
selfishness as political heroism.  What qualities might better describe 21st
century Europe?

    Germany has come a long way downhill from Adenauer and Schmidt to
Gerhard Schroeder.  Most difficult of all for us to stomach were remarks
from members of the German government comparing President Bush to Hitler.
Now, does anyone reading this newspaper believe that's an honest comparison?
 And was it fitting coming from a German official?  One thinks not.
Americans heard the echo of Joseph Goebbels.

    Then there were all the demonstrators waving signs equating the United
States to the Nazi regime, as tasteless a display as Germany has managed
since the last crematorium went cold.  Once our tempers cooled, we realized
that all these Nazi comparisons weren't really about us.  It was all about
you, your guilt and your evasions.

    Perhaps the most revealing incident of the war came during a television
interview with a young protester in Berlin after Baghdad had fallen.  The
reporter asked him what he thought of the images of Iraqis cheering U.S.
Marines and toppling Saddam's statue.  The young German said the scenes
''annoyed'' him.  Doubtless.  Reality is annoying, indeed.

    Oh, we know how you see us.  You never cease telling us.  We are
uncultured, because we cannot recall the date of the first performance of
Das Rheingold.  We are heartless, since our society favors opportunity over
security.  We are naïve, since we do not share your prejudices.  We are
warmongers, because we still believe some things are worth defending.  And
now we are Nazis, because we moved to depose a dictator who had slaughtered
his own people as well as his neighbors, while harboring terrorists and
pursuing weapons of mass destruction.[/i]
Link Posted: 6/30/2003 11:14:29 PM EDT
[#1]
Part II

[i]
    Of course, you continue to buy our cultural products.  Your brightest
young people come to our shores to work.  We Americans have moved beyond the
racism that blights Germany and France (we look forward to meeting a German
Colin Powell of Turkish ancestry in Berlin or an ethnic-Senegalese
Condoleeza Rice in Paris), so we certainly do not share your prejudices.

    And after the events of September 11th, 2001, we will not wait to be
attacked, but will strike pre-emptively wherever we believe it to be
necessary-and we shall do so without ever again asking Europe's permission.
 So we are, indeed, warmongers by European standards.

    Now, with Germany's Jews long since slaughtered or driven out (to
America's great benefit, thank you), you attack Israel at every opportunity,
hanging on every Palestinian claim, no matter how absurd, and inventing
Israeli atrocities.  Americans see Israelis as fighting for their existence
against those who want to exterminate them.  You view Israelis as a reproach
to your past deeds, and you lash out at them.  Clausewitz is no longer a
guide to your national behavior.  Today, we need to consult Sigmund Freud.
A Jew, of course.

    The Israelis, too, have been called Nazis by your elected
politicians-indeed, ''Nazi'' seems to be your favorite insult.  At times it
sounds to us as though everyone who isn't a German is now a Nazi.  Unless,
of course, we are talking of Arabs who murder Jews, in which case a good
German speaks of freedom fighters.

    Here in America, Holocaust survivors live among us, as do those aging
G.I.s who opened the gates to Dachau.  They have been our fathers, our
teachers and our neighbors.  Is it any wonder that we find your rhetoric
repulsive?  Hitler, at least, was honest about his bigotry.

    And now we must endure the ludicrous schizophrenia of your present
society, in which you alternate between insisting that German guilt must
have an end and indulging in revisionist history that equates the allied
bombing campaign against your cities or the sinking of ships ferrying
submarine crews with Nazi evils.  Your attempts to excuse the inexcusable
merely remind us that Germany deserved every bomb dropped upon its soil.
Bush the equivalent of Hitler?  Show us the American death camps, please.

    Auf wiedersehen, Lili Marleen.  It was great while it lasted.

    And Marianne?  Since no one took Germany seriously to begin with,
Berlin had less to lose in l'affaire Iraq than Paris.  France gambled with
Dostoevskian abandon in the strategic casino and ended up bankrupt in the
morning light.  President Chirac and his sorcerer's apprentice, Foreign
Minister Dominique de Villepin, emerged as one of the most incompetent
combinations in diplomatic history, two drunkards behind the steering wheel
of policy.  It astonishes us that the French actually believed that Paris
could dictate terms to Washington.  Sorry. Gaul does not give orders to
Rome.

    We understood that Chirac was playing to the Arab world as well as to
his domestic electorate.  But the succession of French refusals to negotiate
seriously or even to consider compromises at the United Nations, climaxed by
France's announcement, in advance, that it would veto any further
resolutions introduced by the United States or Britain, seemed suicidal to
us.  And it was suicidal.  The legacy of Charles de Gaulle perished in the
Security Council.  The tradition of permitting France a greater voice in
trans-Atlantic decision-making than its place, power or contributions
merited is over, as dead as Jean-Paul Sartre or his idol, Josef Stalin.  The
Gallic cock crowed so loudly it fell off the fence and broke its neck.

    Washington will no longer entertain the views of Paris on vital
international issues.  Nor will we risk another French veto on a matter we
view as critical to our national security.  And we will feed the United
Nations the crumbs of strategy.

    Far from expanding its influence, France has forced its collapse.  A
quick round of applause in Algeria is hardly worth the loss of America's
ear.  Briefly the champion of all the anti-American forces in the world,
from Libya to North Korea, France is left unable to resolve the civil strife
in Ivory Coast.  And Paris will not be given a significant role in
rebuilding Iraq.

    France long has seemed to Americans to be the apotheosis of European
hypocrisy.  While defending Saddam Hussein from ''American aggression,'' Mr.
Chirac hosted Robert Mugabe in Paris in a pathetic attempt to expand French
influence into Anglophone Africa.  But I was in Zimbabwe when the visit
occurred and the degree of fury the people of that country felt toward
France for hosting Mugabe-whom they have nicknamed ''Robodan
Mugabevich''-guaranteed that the French will never be welcome between the
Zambezi and the Limpopo.

    France seems to us an aging whore desperate to attract even the most
diseased customers.  But, above all, it is French naivete that leaves us
shaking our heads.  How could they so misjudge the situation?  Aren't the
French supposed to be terribly clever and devious?  How could they be so
clumsy, and on such a grand scale?  The short answer is that, like Arabs,
they believed their own fantasies.  In addition to the forlorn illusion that
France is still a great power, Mr. Chirac and Mr. de Villepin utterly
misjudged George Bush.  They had called him a cowboy for so long that they
came to believe there was nothing to the man.  And they were wrong.

    I did not vote for President Bush.  But, after 9/11/01, I was glad he
was our president.  Had Al Gore been in the White House, we would have done
the European thing and formed a committee to ask how we had brought disaster
upon ourselves.  President Bush led a galvanized nation into a series of
deliberate, carefully-considered actions that have broken the back of one
terrorist organization after another while removing a brutal, backward
theocracy from one country and a blood-encrusted dictatorship from another.

    And America is not finished.  We will no longer subscribe to the
European system in which dictators may do as they wish with impunity within
their own borders-your insistence on respect for national sovereignty simply
means that Hitler would have been perfectly acceptable had he only killed
German Jews.  And we will not follow the traditions of kings and kaisers in
which heads of state are exempt from personal punishment, no matter their
crimes.  We will go after the truly guilty, not the masses.And no amount of insults hurled from beneath the Brandenburg Gate or from the Place de la Concorde will deter us.

We are finished with your delight in weeping over past holocausts while you remain unwilling to act to prevent or interrupt new holocausts.

Srebrenica is the European model. Baghdad is ours.

President Bush is a Texan, as Europeans never fail to remind us. But the intelligence services of France and Germany seem to have failed to understand the character of Texans. They don't speak artfully, but they act resolutely. They aren't relativists.

Texans believe there is a difference between right and wrong. And when you insult a Texan to his face while betraying his trust, he is not going to take it kindly. Confronting a Texan in public is always ill-advised, unless you intend to fight it out to the end-and have the means to do so. Texans don't even care where Europe is on the map.

We Americans are all Texans now. You have left us no choice.



Ralph Peters is a retired U.S. Army officer and the author of sixteen books,
including novels, collections of essays, and works on strategy.  His most
recent book is ''Beyond Terror: Strategy in a Changing World.''[/i]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 1:05:44 AM EDT
[#2]
Great article. I'd love to see what the response was overseas. Personally, I am swelling with pride after reading that article. There is no title though. What is the title of the article?
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 1:13:59 AM EDT
[#3]
Edited to add title- here is the link to the english version:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/922556/posts
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 4:17:19 AM EDT
[#4]

France seems to us an aging whore desperate to attract even the most diseased customers.
View Quote


That's putting it too kindly.
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 4:45:22 AM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 5:18:23 AM EDT
[#6]
wow, great stuff.

[banana]
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 5:18:44 AM EDT
[#7]
...a very nicely written article.
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 5:47:40 AM EDT
[#8]
The French & Germans threw the term "cowboy" around like they thought it was some sort of insult.  That shows how little they really understand.  
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 5:49:45 AM EDT
[#9]
Damn.

I wish I could write like that! [:(]
Link Posted: 7/1/2003 6:11:03 AM EDT
[#10]
Too long, I'll wait for the movie.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top