Part II
[i]
Of course, you continue to buy our cultural products. Your brightest
young people come to our shores to work. We Americans have moved beyond the
racism that blights Germany and France (we look forward to meeting a German
Colin Powell of Turkish ancestry in Berlin or an ethnic-Senegalese
Condoleeza Rice in Paris), so we certainly do not share your prejudices.
And after the events of September 11th, 2001, we will not wait to be
attacked, but will strike pre-emptively wherever we believe it to be
necessary-and we shall do so without ever again asking Europe's permission.
So we are, indeed, warmongers by European standards.
Now, with Germany's Jews long since slaughtered or driven out (to
America's great benefit, thank you), you attack Israel at every opportunity,
hanging on every Palestinian claim, no matter how absurd, and inventing
Israeli atrocities. Americans see Israelis as fighting for their existence
against those who want to exterminate them. You view Israelis as a reproach
to your past deeds, and you lash out at them. Clausewitz is no longer a
guide to your national behavior. Today, we need to consult Sigmund Freud.
A Jew, of course.
The Israelis, too, have been called Nazis by your elected
politicians-indeed, ''Nazi'' seems to be your favorite insult. At times it
sounds to us as though everyone who isn't a German is now a Nazi. Unless,
of course, we are talking of Arabs who murder Jews, in which case a good
German speaks of freedom fighters.
Here in America, Holocaust survivors live among us, as do those aging
G.I.s who opened the gates to Dachau. They have been our fathers, our
teachers and our neighbors. Is it any wonder that we find your rhetoric
repulsive? Hitler, at least, was honest about his bigotry.
And now we must endure the ludicrous schizophrenia of your present
society, in which you alternate between insisting that German guilt must
have an end and indulging in revisionist history that equates the allied
bombing campaign against your cities or the sinking of ships ferrying
submarine crews with Nazi evils. Your attempts to excuse the inexcusable
merely remind us that Germany deserved every bomb dropped upon its soil.
Bush the equivalent of Hitler? Show us the American death camps, please.
Auf wiedersehen, Lili Marleen. It was great while it lasted.
And Marianne? Since no one took Germany seriously to begin with,
Berlin had less to lose in l'affaire Iraq than Paris. France gambled with
Dostoevskian abandon in the strategic casino and ended up bankrupt in the
morning light. President Chirac and his sorcerer's apprentice, Foreign
Minister Dominique de Villepin, emerged as one of the most incompetent
combinations in diplomatic history, two drunkards behind the steering wheel
of policy. It astonishes us that the French actually believed that Paris
could dictate terms to Washington. Sorry. Gaul does not give orders to
Rome.
We understood that Chirac was playing to the Arab world as well as to
his domestic electorate. But the succession of French refusals to negotiate
seriously or even to consider compromises at the United Nations, climaxed by
France's announcement, in advance, that it would veto any further
resolutions introduced by the United States or Britain, seemed suicidal to
us. And it was suicidal. The legacy of Charles de Gaulle perished in the
Security Council. The tradition of permitting France a greater voice in
trans-Atlantic decision-making than its place, power or contributions
merited is over, as dead as Jean-Paul Sartre or his idol, Josef Stalin. The
Gallic cock crowed so loudly it fell off the fence and broke its neck.
Washington will no longer entertain the views of Paris on vital
international issues. Nor will we risk another French veto on a matter we
view as critical to our national security. And we will feed the United
Nations the crumbs of strategy.
Far from expanding its influence, France has forced its collapse. A
quick round of applause in Algeria is hardly worth the loss of America's
ear. Briefly the champion of all the anti-American forces in the world,
from Libya to North Korea, France is left unable to resolve the civil strife
in Ivory Coast. And Paris will not be given a significant role in
rebuilding Iraq.
France long has seemed to Americans to be the apotheosis of European
hypocrisy. While defending Saddam Hussein from ''American aggression,'' Mr.
Chirac hosted Robert Mugabe in Paris in a pathetic attempt to expand French
influence into Anglophone Africa. But I was in Zimbabwe when the visit
occurred and the degree of fury the people of that country felt toward
France for hosting Mugabe-whom they have nicknamed ''Robodan
Mugabevich''-guaranteed that the French will never be welcome between the
Zambezi and the Limpopo.
France seems to us an aging whore desperate to attract even the most
diseased customers. But, above all, it is French naivete that leaves us
shaking our heads. How could they so misjudge the situation? Aren't the
French supposed to be terribly clever and devious? How could they be so
clumsy, and on such a grand scale? The short answer is that, like Arabs,
they believed their own fantasies. In addition to the forlorn illusion that
France is still a great power, Mr. Chirac and Mr. de Villepin utterly
misjudged George Bush. They had called him a cowboy for so long that they
came to believe there was nothing to the man. And they were wrong.
I did not vote for President Bush. But, after 9/11/01, I was glad he
was our president. Had Al Gore been in the White House, we would have done
the European thing and formed a committee to ask how we had brought disaster
upon ourselves. President Bush led a galvanized nation into a series of
deliberate, carefully-considered actions that have broken the back of one
terrorist organization after another while removing a brutal, backward
theocracy from one country and a blood-encrusted dictatorship from another.
And America is not finished. We will no longer subscribe to the
European system in which dictators may do as they wish with impunity within
their own borders-your insistence on respect for national sovereignty simply
means that Hitler would have been perfectly acceptable had he only killed
German Jews. And we will not follow the traditions of kings and kaisers in
which heads of state are exempt from personal punishment, no matter their
crimes. We will go after the truly guilty, not the masses.And no amount of insults hurled from beneath the Brandenburg Gate or from the Place de la Concorde will deter us.
We are finished with your delight in weeping over past holocausts while you remain unwilling to act to prevent or interrupt new holocausts.
Srebrenica is the European model. Baghdad is ours.
President Bush is a Texan, as Europeans never fail to remind us. But the intelligence services of France and Germany seem to have failed to understand the character of Texans. They don't speak artfully, but they act resolutely. They aren't relativists.
Texans believe there is a difference between right and wrong. And when you insult a Texan to his face while betraying his trust, he is not going to take it kindly. Confronting a Texan in public is always ill-advised, unless you intend to fight it out to the end-and have the means to do so. Texans don't even care where Europe is on the map.
We Americans are all Texans now. You have left us no choice.
Ralph Peters is a retired U.S. Army officer and the author of sixteen books,
including novels, collections of essays, and works on strategy. His most
recent book is ''Beyond Terror: Strategy in a Changing World.''[/i]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>