Warning
Close
Confirm Action
Are you sure you wish to do this?
Cancel
Confirm
Active Topics
Newest Topics
Code of Conduct
8869
Online
Light
Dark
AR15.COM
Forums
AR-15
AK-47
Handgun
Precision Rifles
Armory
Training
Competitive Shooting
General
Outdoors
Archery
Hometown
Industry
Archives
Equipment Exchange
New EE Listings
Getting Started
Rules and Guidelines
EE Forums
Blog
Gear Deals
Store
Tools
Active Topics
Newest Topics
Code of Conduct
All Forums
Community List
General
Industry
AR-15
AK-47
Handguns
Armory
Equipment Exchange
Hometown
Training
Outdoors
Competition Shooting
Archery
Precision Rifles
My Account
AR15.COM
All Forums
Community List
General
Industry
AR-15
AK-47
Handguns
Armory
Equipment Exchange
Hometown
Training
Outdoors
Competition Shooting
Archery
Precision Rifles
Light
Dark
User Panel
Log In
Register
Forums
AR-15
AK-47
Handgun
Precision Rifles
Armory
Training
Competitive Shooting
General
Outdoors
Archery
Hometown
Industry
Archives
Equipment Exchange
New EE Listings
Getting Started
Rules and Guidelines
EE Forums
Blog
Code of Conduct
Gear Deals
Store
View Full Site
8869 Online
Active Topics
Newest Topics
Home
/
General
/
General Discussion
Modern
Classic
Introducing TNVC's NEW and Exclusive Filmed SuperGain (FSG) and Chimera Panoramic Goggle Giveaway!
The People of Virginia VS Grabigial BanBerger | ARFCOM News
ARCHIVED
[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Image hosting
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:22:18 PM EDT
I'm finally gonna break down and get one of those online image hosting servers.
Which one do you use?
What are the pros and cons over other sites?
Which one is the best?
I see Imageshack.us and Photobucket so far.
Just looking for any pointers.
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:22:53 PM EDT
[#1]
Photobucket.
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:25:18 PM EDT
[#2]
ImageShack
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:27:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Photobucket.
+1
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:29:24 PM EDT
[#4]
I've used both imagehosting and photobucket.. I like photobucket better, especially for ebay stuff.
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:29:56 PM EDT
[#5]
I see that imageshack doesn't have a storage space limit, but uses those thumbnail pictures on the page, instead of the regular sized photo.
Does photobucket do something similar?
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:38:06 PM EDT
[#6]
I roll my own.
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:41:03 PM EDT
[#7]
tinypic because you don't need an account, and they dont limit your image bandwidth usage.
I got sick and tired of photobucket's "bandwidth exceeded" images placeholders when a lot of people looked at my pics. Never happens with tinypic.
Posted:
10/21/2006 4:47:22 PM EDT
[#8]
image shaq you can use with out an account and post the full size images...
photobucket sizes the pics down.
That being said I use both... both have their place
ARCHIVED
[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Image hosting
Home
/
General
/
General Discussion
Modern
Classic
Active Topics
Newest Topics
Code of Conduct