Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 10/9/2004 10:27:25 AM EST
The Court of Appeals ruling was based on its conclusion that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of the states to maintain armed militias but does not grant individuals the right to bear arms
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:29:46 AM EST
??
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:30:21 AM EST
what decision?
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:31:32 AM EST
It doesn't matter.

Why would ANY US Court see the SA as anything other than an INDIVIDUAL right???

Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:32:26 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/9/2004 10:33:00 AM EST by repub18]

Originally Posted By CRC:
It doesn't matter.

Why would ANY US Court see the SA as anything other than an INDIVIDUAL right???





because that decision was based on a opinion of a fucktard judge
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:33:33 AM EST
where and when was this decided?
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:33:47 AM EST
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:34:46 AM EST
NRA versus Alameda County.
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:34:47 AM EST
That quote is actually in many districts' opinions. That is why Emmerson in TX is so important. It says individual right and thereby creates a split among the various appeals courts. The Supreme Court often (well sometimes) agrees to hear such cases to settle the law and make it consistant throught the counrty (although, I think the S.CT already denied hearing Emmerson).
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:35:21 AM EST

Originally Posted By Right-to-Bear:
That quote is actually in many districts' opinions. That is why Emmerson in TX is so important. It says individual right and thereby creates a split among the various appeals courts. The Supreme Court often (well sometimes) agrees to hear such cases to settle the law and make it consistant throught the counrty (although, I think the S.CT already denied hearing Emmerson).



Yep. LOTS of districts.

CRC
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:35:22 AM EST
I bet it was the 9th Circus court of appeals.
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:37:59 AM EST

Originally Posted By 444slayer:
I bet it was the 9th Circus court of appeals.



I was about to say the same thing!

Its coming.
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:44:36 AM EST
So what happens if SCOTUS takes the same opinion???

CRC
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:44:57 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/9/2004 10:47:16 AM EST by Da_Bunny]
Boy, are they gonna be surprised...

The right to govern comes from the governed.
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:49:25 AM EST
SCOTUS declined to hear it this week.

CRC
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 10:52:17 AM EST
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 11:10:17 AM EST
Doesn't bother me either way. I'll not change my lifestyle one way or the other.
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 11:11:56 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/9/2004 11:21:21 AM EST by repub18]

Originally Posted By CRC:
So what happens if SCOTUS takes the same opinion???

CRC




um, we be screwed
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 11:50:44 AM EST
My weapons and I believe the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right.

Nobody elses opinion really matters!
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 1:22:30 PM EST

Originally Posted By Da_Bunny:
Boy, are they gonna be surprised...

The right to govern comes from the governed.




Well some of us think that way....


They on the other hand.....
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 1:29:27 PM EST
Funny how the 9th circuit court also ruled that home made machineguns that don't travel interstate are legal, the '86 cutoff notwithstanding. Too bad the defendant in that case was an ass.
Top Top