Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 12/18/2003 10:32:22 AM EDT
Oh shit! Look at this!!!!!!!!

Others were upset that a country where civilians were able to freely own machine guns could have a lower murder rate than our own nation’s capital where even handguns are banned. The claim did not sit well with those pushing to renew the assault weapons ban (search) in our own country.

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105954,00.html
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 10:40:54 AM EDT
umm, because the rational behind the ban was that assault weapons were leading to higher body counts on the street here... I LOVE this report by the way [:)] since it proves that both the 86 MG ban and the AWB are worthless.
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 10:51:37 AM EDT
Originally Posted By ArmdLbrl: umm, because the rational behind the ban was that assault weapons were leading to higher body counts on the street here... I LOVE this report by the way [:)] since it proves that both the 86 MG ban and the AWB are worthless.
View Quote
You would like it cause you are a gun nut who likes high capacity automatic weapons. Err, in that case - I like it too. [:D]
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 10:57:36 AM EDT
thats nice to hesr, especially after O'ryles mess
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 10:58:13 AM EDT
Lott basically caught these New York Times creeps in a lie, trying to make things look bad. [pissed] Good article.
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 11:00:19 AM EDT
It really shouldn't suprise people that some neighborhoods in the US are some of the most dangerous in the world. Our own government has created a culture where crime flourishes. The prohibition economy (drugs & other contraband), added to the otherwise relaxed 'security measures' a free society must have, invites wholesale crime and corruption as demand is fed outside the grace of the government. The nanny statists (socialists), have used this fact to further their agenda of complete government control and power over the citizenry. In their dream environment, where one must ask the government permission before even cutting a tree down, you can imagine what they think of individuals owning weapons. After all, the state is not served by that! Since they are not that strong yet, 'sporting purposes' is the current mantra. In time, the socialists would eliminate the 'sporting' (a ban on hunting, target shooting, etc...) and thus even these weapons would no longer serve a societal purpose (wink, wink).
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 11:00:39 AM EDT
Originally Posted By Ridge: Lott basically caught these New York Times creeps in a lie, trying to make things look bad. [pissed] Good article.
View Quote
Its actually a two-fer up the Dems poop chutes. 1. It PROVES their unholy love child, the AWB, is worthless. In fact, it proves the OPPOSITE to be true. 2. It PROVES things aren't as bad in Iraq as they are trying to paint them.
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 11:04:03 AM EDT
The New York Times lies to people??? OMG what am I going to do???[shock]
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 11:04:37 AM EDT
The Leftists are so convinced that guns are in a direct causal relationship to crime that they go into vaporlock when facts that suggest otherwise are presented. When something doesn't make sense, check your premise. The Demos desperately need to check their premises.
Link Posted: 12/18/2003 11:29:40 AM EDT
They are so convinced because they want safety without changing their own life style- but its perfectly ok to force others to change their life style.
Top Top