Posted: 11/22/2013 2:10:16 PM EDT
|
Not HIPPA Compliant
Anyone signing up or attempting to apply for Obamacare will give up any privacy rights as noted in hidden source code. Hearings Expose Hidden Code in Obamacare – No Right to Privacy “You have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system,” is the message which is hidden from view as a person signing up for obamacare agrees to the conditions. In order to continue with the process, an applicant, by default, agrees to the lack of an expectation of privacy. Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=086_1385148641#FoeP2MpgrBwU1yhO.99 |
NO, really it is... FBHO with a barbed wire covered fireplace poker.
|
Quoted:
Is that in the same source code that was a part of someone else's code but the author's copyright/info was removed? No, that was the "DataTables" plugin for a JavaScript library called jQuery. Here is the copyright notice on a version of DataTables that I'm including in a web site that I'm building: /* * File: jquery.dataTables.min.js * Version: 1.9.4 * Author: Allan Jardine (www.sprymedia.co.uk) * Info: www.datatables.net * * Copyright 2008-2012 Allan Jardine, all rights reserved. * * This source file is free software, under either the GPL v2 license or a * BSD style license, available at: * http://datatables.net/license_gpl2 * http://datatables.net/license_bsd * * This source file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY * or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the license files for details. */ ETA: The DataTables code is dual-licensed under the GPL (v2) and BSD licenses. The BSD license basically states "use this code, sell this code, whatever, we don't care as long as the copyright notice remains in tact.", so all they had to do to be compliant was not delete the copyright notice. They probably charged our government $1,000 just to delete those lines. 
FBHO |
|
Quoted:
No, that was the "DataTables" plugin for a JavaScript library called jQuery. Here is the copyright notice on a version of DataTables that I'm including in a web site that I'm building: /* * File: jquery.dataTables.min.js * Version: 1.9.4 * Author: Allan Jardine (www.sprymedia.co.uk) * Info: www.datatables.net * * Copyright 2008-2012 Allan Jardine, all rights reserved. * * This source file is free software, under either the GPL v2 license or a * BSD style license, available at: * http://datatables.net/license_gpl2 * http://datatables.net/license_bsd * * This source file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY * or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the license files for details. */ ETA: The DataTables code is dual-licensed under the GPL (v2) and BSD licenses. The BSD license basically states "use this code, sell this code, whatever, we don't care as long as the copyright notice remains in tact.", so all they had to do to be compliant was not delete the copyright notice. They probably charged our government $1,000 just to delete those lines.
FBHO Quoted:
Quoted:
Is that in the same source code that was a part of someone else's code but the author's copyright/info was removed? No, that was the "DataTables" plugin for a JavaScript library called jQuery. Here is the copyright notice on a version of DataTables that I'm including in a web site that I'm building: /* * File: jquery.dataTables.min.js * Version: 1.9.4 * Author: Allan Jardine (www.sprymedia.co.uk) * Info: www.datatables.net * * Copyright 2008-2012 Allan Jardine, all rights reserved. * * This source file is free software, under either the GPL v2 license or a * BSD style license, available at: * http://datatables.net/license_gpl2 * http://datatables.net/license_bsd * * This source file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY * or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the license files for details. */ ETA: The DataTables code is dual-licensed under the GPL (v2) and BSD licenses. The BSD license basically states "use this code, sell this code, whatever, we don't care as long as the copyright notice remains in tact.", so all they had to do to be compliant was not delete the copyright notice. They probably charged our government $1,000 just to delete those lines.
FBHO Very similar to one aspect of what Google was accused of I believe with android. Google one argued, if I am not mistaken, that although their code looked and functioned identically, they had actually developed it from a completely "clean" environment. Using previous Java employees of course. They proved the clean room as well. |
|
I saw a whole lot of passing the buck and claiming ignorance in that vid.
She obviously knew and didn't think it was an issue from her posture and facial expressions, she thought the question was silly, so stated it was somebody else's call, which she approved. |
|
That's not source code. That's a fucking license agreement.
If you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, try shutting the fuck up once and a while. Dumbasses running their mouth don't help their cause; they just look like dumbasses. EDIT: I want to know what he means by "hidden". I'm guessing he means "commented out", i.e., removed. |