this whole AR vs AK is soooo stupid, its a dead issue
i dont think one is better than the other, both have strengths and weaknesses, i own both and enjoy shooting both
in a forest/jungle combat zone i would probably take the AK, but in a urban combat zone id take the AR
different tools for different purposes
it seems to me that the whole reason this stupid thread was started was to show that russians dont produce quality products except for the AK, and in some opinions even that is not worth a darn
in fact i DO own or have used some russian products that i enjoy are feel are historically and militarily interesting, and just FUN
--russian SKS (ill never part with and wish i had more)
--russian Saiga AK rifle (closest thing to a real russian AK you will get, and they come in 308)
--russian Saiga 12ga SHOTGUN (the AR is not the only versatile weapon system around, the russian military makes smaller AKs in 9mm and many other calibers, there just not seen in this country)
--romanian AK (wish i had more)
--east german makarov (wish i had more, id take it over a walther)
--russian CCCP wristwatch (works great, plan to get more)
--russian urshanka hat
--russian PSO1 scope (illuminated post reticle, mounts on the side of the gun, returns to zero after removal)
--russian navy belt and makarov holster
--german mag pouchs
--chinese AK chest pouch
--and id like to get a russian tokerov pistol (browning design) and a nagant revolver (just for sh*ts and grins, and the cylinder moves forward to create a gas seal against the barrel -- neat eh?)
i used to think the chinese guns were junk, but i got my head out of my @ss and realized they were pretty good.
i think people who think poorly about communist designed guns and other stuff need to take a closer look before passing a negative judgement. it may not be the greatest, but its not the worst either, and you need to take into consideration that these are communist countries and there thinking
when it comes to the AK there are strengths (i beleive) in the design, and not just the reliablity of the action. the mag change may be slow but it forces a soldier to positively lock the mag in place, and not slap it in and hope it locks and/or have it fall out. you sure wont have mag reliablity problems like you do with AR mags, gunk and dirt could prevent the AR from dropping free. the safety lever is large enough that you could tell if the gun is on safe or not from a distance.
when it comes down to it you dont need 1 MOA in a combat situation, and will probably never shoot 1 MOA if you were in a fighting role, so whats the purpose of the extra accuracy?
also people dont give credit where credit is due, for the past 25 years the AK74 has been shooting a round similar to the 223, and a few AKs are chambered in 223. the ARs accuracy probably comes more so from the round chambered, the 223 is just inherently more accurate than the 762x39
but then in a combat zone if you can hit a man size target at up to 300 yards what else do you need? RELIABLITY, you wont have a nice benchrest and all the time in the world to make nice clean groups
im not dumping on the AR, i own 2 and will never part with them, and havent had a lick of problems except for bad mags, but people are too closed minded to give the AK a chance, or to see what it is and isnt
different tools for different problems