Quote History Quoted:
You tell me. Are highly trained professionals also coming in with shitty work ethics and bad attitudes? I'm sure it varies.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:Quoted:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't this logically depend on experience requirements, educational requirements, competitiveness of industry, applicant pool for said industry, etc.?
Could a new hire in highly competitive field X at sought after company Y with rigorous education and/or training requirements (and let's throw in excess applicants/labor E) be compared with a new hire in a field that requires little to no education or formal training with the applicant pool basically being limited by location and better opportunities for potential applicants?
You tell me. Are highly trained professionals also coming in with shitty work ethics and bad attitudes? I'm sure it varies.
It depends on how you define shitty work ethics and bad attitudes.
If you actually mean mean shitty attitudes and bad work ethics, then for the most part, no.
Entry, mid career, and senior professions know of and understand what has occurred over the past several decades.
Lost pensions, worsened benefits, bottlenecked advanced and promotions, tip of the pyramid personnel increasing their proportional reimbursement 20 fold while stagnating other salaries, etc. - and have essentially zero tolerance for or disposition to put up with expectations that,
In previous generations,
Had reasonable expectations to be rewarded,
Because they have seen too many put those efforts in and get burned.
And have adopted a fuck you/pay me mentality.
For example. I kind of , sort of, tangentially through a family member, know a dual business/stem tier one type with over 20 years of history with a 2K employee/2B net type company, that they started with when the company was new, get laid off.
They are a fairly senior stem department manager, and replaced by a very inexperienced relatively new hire, making about 1/5th as much, to do the same job, while the tier above them has maintained or increased pay.
This was not a performance issue. This was people maintaining or increasing their pay by replacing them with someone much cheaper even if it is bad for the company.
The person stuck with the same job for 1/5th the pay will not be putting up with the expectations of their predecessor.
They will end up getting marked as not a team player, bad attitude, etc.