Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 4/11/2006 9:24:51 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 4/11/2006 9:28:57 AM EDT by M4-AK]
What results have you had with your Henry or Golden Boy. I looking into buy one, and the price is much lower on the 001 Henry. What's the difference?

Link Posted: 4/11/2006 9:31:04 AM EDT
Henry has to be fed from the barrel end,

That makes them a bit dangerous to load. There have been discharges if the ammo is dropped in at too steep an angle. Also the Henry can become hot to hold after repeated firing. They are quite beautiful, but the '66 is a worthy improvment, imo.

Besides being the most beautiful levergun ever, the '66 loads from a gate, and is a stronger reciever. Ya going cowboy action shooting?
Link Posted: 4/11/2006 9:33:30 AM EDT
Now we're talking .22lr guns here right? Not old timey real Henry rifles. Is that what you are describing?

Link Posted: 4/11/2006 9:43:51 AM EDT
Ah, the new Henry .22s.
Link Posted: 4/11/2006 10:22:06 AM EDT
Neither. Marlin 39A.
Link Posted: 4/11/2006 10:29:11 AM EDT
I almost had myself convinced to buy one of the Henry .22 lever guns. I went to the nearest gunshop and he had 4 of them. One was the golden boy. All off them had crooked rear sights that were very noticeable. It looked like the barrel was timed incorrectly . I'm sure they would have still sighted in OK, but I just couldn't buy one looked like that. Hopefully this isn't the norm for Henry.
Link Posted: 4/11/2006 5:24:02 PM EDT
Top Top