[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54802-2002Jun27.html]Supreme Court OKs School Vouchers[/url]

[i]The Associated Press -
The 5-4 ruling led by the court's [b][red]conservative[/red][/b] majority lowers the figurative wall separating church and state and clears a constitutional cloud from school vouchers, a divisive education idea dear to political [b][red]conservatives[/red][/b] and championed by President Bush.

[b]Opponents[/b] call vouchers a fraud meant to siphon tax money from struggling public schools.
.
.
.
The Cleveland program goes too far toward state-sponsored religion, the [b]dissenting justices[/b] said. The majority is also wrong about the question of whether parents have a true choice among schools, Souter wrote for himself and [b]Justices[/b] John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer
[/i]


Once again... the "conservatives" are exposed, stamped, sealed, labeled, highlighted, underscored, marked, double-marked and triple-marked by the Media for all the public to see their qualifying (and attempted discrediting) descriptive.


But where's the corresponding knee-jerk label [b][red]"liberal"[/red][/b] moniker when mentioning the "opponents" or the "dissenting justices"??!?! [pissed]


[b]F@CK-IT!! I [b]HATE[/b] MEDIA BIAS!!![/b]

Don't read Ann Coulter's book.  You'll have to use 3 or 4 of those "pissed" smileys instead of just one.

I don't quite see where they're coming from with that line... any clue?

Yeah, They're coming from the Soviet Union School of Journalistic Integrity.


Good catch [b]jetlag[/b]!

File this one as just another example of blatant liberal editorializing in the supposedly "objective" reporting of "facts" by the Media.