Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 3/22/2002 2:23:17 PM EDT
Find the Boeing [url]http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm[/url] explanations here [url]http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm[/url] which do you believe?
Link Posted: 3/22/2002 4:15:40 PM EDT
I believe the explanation for the simple reason there was no bomb crater and I don't believe a bomb would result in so much interior damage, especially after the recent reinforcements.
Link Posted: 3/22/2002 4:20:45 PM EDT
In a few of my classes we have studied aircraft crash patterns, and by taking a good look at the photos, I have any doubt that an airplane hit the building. I'm no expert though.
Link Posted: 3/22/2002 4:26:24 PM EDT
I didn't see any truck parts lying about either. [:)] -elliott
Link Posted: 3/22/2002 6:53:57 PM EDT
it was a hit and fly, arrest the pilot!
Link Posted: 3/22/2002 7:12:55 PM EDT
Uh because planes are made largely of aluminium and alloys to save weight and that no matter how fast the plane is going flying it into reinforced concrete you wont have much but small fragments left which is what you had -- a damaged building and small aluminium skin fragments all over the place, actually the faster the plane is going the smaller the bits are likely to be.
Link Posted: 3/22/2002 7:58:22 PM EDT
I smell a conspiracy [beer]
Top Top