Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 5
Next Page
12/13/2007 12:20:42 PM EDT
Described to me today as "mind technology" where you can spy on someone with nothing but your brain, anywhere in the world.  I already think its horseshit, but figured it would be interesting GD fodder.  

I have to think that out of the thousands we have here, at least one of you "knows how to do it."
12/13/2007 12:21:44 PM EDT
[#1]
Is God real?
12/13/2007 12:21:55 PM EDT
[#2]
Just one?
12/13/2007 12:22:40 PM EDT
[#3]
If I take my tinfoil off I can remote view anyone I want to.

You may have seen my daughter on the show Heros.

Another friend can fly, a chick that I dated can throw electric from her hands.
12/13/2007 12:23:02 PM EDT
[#4]
Hold up some fingers and I'll try it.
12/13/2007 12:23:44 PM EDT
[#5]
There's a pretty good movie about remote viewing:

Suspect Zero
12/13/2007 12:28:11 PM EDT
[#6]

Then that one person has a problem. Those with secrets like to kill off people who they don't want to see the secrets. Plus there is controlling it, imagine it getting stuck on. Plenty of things shouldn't be seen. Plus what about reception? Exactly how to control such a thing. Does no good to turn it on and see some random person a thousand miles away reading the newspaper.
12/13/2007 12:35:21 PM EDT
[#7]
Seems like BS to me...
12/13/2007 12:37:45 PM EDT
[#8]
It works, I am watching right now.  Get your hand out of your pants.
12/13/2007 12:37:52 PM EDT
[#9]
Sylar can do that, I think.
12/13/2007 12:43:57 PM EDT
[#10]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Dames

Remote viewing guru (was also in the Suspect Zero movie). Apparently the CIA ran a remote viewing program for some time and concluded that remote viewing worked more often than random chance.
12/13/2007 12:44:58 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
There's a pretty good movie about remote viewing:

Suspect Zero


Great movie and it proves the fact that the worst serial killers are truck drivers.




12/13/2007 12:45:14 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
Sylar can do that, I think.


He is shit out of luck, Powerless right now

Will keep you updated
12/13/2007 12:48:00 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Dames

Remote viewing guru (was also in the Suspect Zero movie). Apparently the CIA ran a remote viewing program for some time and concluded that remote viewing worked more often than random chance.


There is a spooky element to it.  The CIA was trying to track Russian subs with remote viewing and were having some apparent success (satellite and SOSUS tracks were agreeing with the viewers).

One time, the viewer discovered a craft hovering over the sub.  The picture they drew of it was what appeared to be a UFO.



12/13/2007 12:53:52 PM EDT
[#14]
We really don’t understand the nature of consciousness yet, so I’m not going to say it’s impossible for some people to do it under certain circumstances. But if someone could do it repeatedly they would either use it to make a fortune or use it to spy on women in the shower… At least I would.

I have seen a few people show incredible “insight” at times that can’t be explained by conventional means. Oddly enough this seems fairly common for people under the influence of hallucinogens. But I’ve also know a whole lot of people who claim to have psychic powers who were obviously full of it. One in particular was probably schizotypal but most of the others just seem to want attention or they feel the need to be special.
12/13/2007 12:57:56 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Sylar can do that, I think.


He is shit out of luck, Powerless right now

Will keep you updated



I'm almost done with the first season on DVD. I'll wait til the next season is out on DVD (or we bother to put a TV in the room that has the tivo type thingie) because I can't stand watching all the commercials that are in a TV show now.
12/13/2007 1:04:40 PM EDT
[#16]
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.
12/13/2007 1:06:29 PM EDT
[#17]
  I believe remote viewing is a reality,
the same way people can sense danger,
or that someone is watching them.

This thread reminds me of the beginning of "Ghostbusters"
when Venkman is holding the cards and giving shocks.

 Couple of wavy lines???  
12/13/2007 1:07:55 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
Sylar can do that, I think.


Can he see a large guy dressed in women's ligerine hunkered over a pannini grill somewhere in NY right now?  
12/13/2007 1:15:13 PM EDT
[#19]
I have remote viewing powers, but I only use them to cook microwave popcorn without using a microwave oven.
12/13/2007 1:22:29 PM EDT
[#20]
in before someone says some hogwash that we only use 10% of our brains.

oh and here
www.skepdic.com/remotevw.html
12/13/2007 1:22:32 PM EDT
[#21]
Ingo Swann knows
12/13/2007 1:23:34 PM EDT
[#22]
My xwife could do it.
12/13/2007 1:26:48 PM EDT
[#23]
Call me freaky but Ive actually had some success at it. Have been able to tell someone what was sitting on their coffee table 5000mi away and that their neighbor burned his BBQ the night before by the awful smell.
I know I know the BS flags are a wavin.....but your right seems like BS if you havent actually done it or seen it done.
12/13/2007 1:29:17 PM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.
12/13/2007 1:36:05 PM EDT
[#25]
Remote viewing is like the predictions of Nostradamus.

Everything can be explained after the fact, but predictive value is nil.
12/13/2007 1:36:46 PM EDT
[#26]
Go here

$1 million bucks if you demonstrate this under scientific observation.

So far, no takers.
12/13/2007 1:37:22 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some problems, myself.


Yeah they spent 24 years to figure out it doesn't work. Uh huh.

(cypher, I'm going to kill the goat in your avatar by looking at it)

12/13/2007 1:39:45 PM EDT
[#28]
Someone kidnapped Molly from Heroes?©

12/13/2007 1:49:08 PM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
Go here

$1 million bucks if you demonstrate this under scientific observation.

So far, no takers.


There's some things that you can never prove to a skeptic.

Remote Viewing is one.

You'd have to know some things about remote viewing to understand what I'm saying.

Also, this one stipulation in their application is enough to eliminate any legitimate candidate:


12. This offer is not open to any and all persons. Before being considered as an applicant, the person applying must satisfy two conditions: First, he/she must have a “media presence,” which means having been published, written about, or known to the media in regard to his/her claimed abilities or powers. This can be established by producing articles, videos, books, or other published material that specifically addresses the person’s abilities. Second, he/she must produce at least one signed document from an academic who has witnessed the powers or abilities of the person, and will validate that these powers or abilities have been verified.
12/13/2007 2:04:54 PM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Go here

$1 million bucks if you demonstrate this under scientific observation.

So far, no takers.


There's some things that you can never prove to a skeptic.

Remote Viewing is one.

You'd have to know some things about remote viewing to understand what I'm saying.

Also, this one stipulation in their application is enough to eliminate any legitimate candidate:


12. This offer is not open to any and all persons. Before being considered as an applicant, the person applying must satisfy two conditions: First, he/she must have a “media presence,” which means having been published, written about, or known to the media in regard to his/her claimed abilities or powers. This can be established by producing articles, videos, books, or other published material that specifically addresses the person’s abilities. Second, he/she must produce at least one signed document from an academic who has witnessed the powers or abilities of the person, and will validate that these powers or abilities have been verified.


No, this is just to keep an endless stream of goofballs from wasting his time.  If you can really do remote viewing, it should be no problem to get some reporter to write a story on it, after you've demonstrated your power.  If you can't cough up for a reporter and an academic, why would you suddenly be able to perform for the Amazing Randi?

12/13/2007 2:09:41 PM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


Just because a gov't agency dicked around with something doesn't give it merit.  Many gov't programs have been attempted that were, to put it kindly, utter silly bullshit.

12/13/2007 2:13:55 PM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Go here

$1 million bucks if you demonstrate this under scientific observation.

So far, no takers.


There's some things that you can never prove to a skeptic.

Remote Viewing is one.

You'd have to know some things about remote viewing to understand what I'm saying.

Also, this one stipulation in their application is enough to eliminate any legitimate candidate:


12. This offer is not open to any and all persons. Before being considered as an applicant, the person applying must satisfy two conditions: First, he/she must have a “media presence,” which means having been published, written about, or known to the media in regard to his/her claimed abilities or powers. This can be established by producing articles, videos, books, or other published material that specifically addresses the person’s abilities. Second, he/she must produce at least one signed document from an academic who has witnessed the powers or abilities of the person, and will validate that these powers or abilities have been verified.


I don't see why that's a problem. If someone can demonstrate this ability for the press (meaning 1 junior reporter desperate for a story), with one "academic" in attendance (university prof who is willing to sign a letter), you're good to go.

Shit man, we're talking about a million bucks! That's like...300 big ones...after taxes!
12/13/2007 2:24:13 PM EDT
[#33]
tag
12/13/2007 2:30:15 PM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


Just because the CIA may have experimented with it doesn't mean it is legitimate. Several police departments have worked with psychics like Sylvia Brown on murder and kidnapping cases. This doesn't mean she isn't full of shit.

Both of these examples ultimately yielded the same result: nothing.
12/13/2007 6:09:20 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
There's a pretty good movie about remote viewing:

Suspect Zero


Great movie and it proves the fact that the worst serial killers are truck drivers.







Dusty...Nationwide???...we got tons o truckdriving Arfcommers..
12/13/2007 6:12:49 PM EDT
[#36]
I can guess what stuff looks from a distance with the best of em.
12/13/2007 6:15:47 PM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:
I have remote viewing powers, but I only use them to cook microwave popcorn without using a microwave oven.



12/13/2007 6:17:57 PM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


Just because the CIA may have experimented with it doesn't mean it is legitimate. Several police departments have worked with psychics like Sylvia Brown on murder and kidnapping cases. This doesn't mean she isn't full of shit.

Both of these examples ultimately yielded the same result: nothing.


True, but apparently there was testimony before congress that the CIA had achieved some limited success.
12/13/2007 6:18:51 PM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


+1

Same category as dowsing (water witching) and other paranormal BS.
12/13/2007 8:18:53 PM EDT
[#40]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


You've experimented with remote viewing?? Really??

Aren't you the "all women are whores" guy too?

Perhaps your side effect was it made your diminished mental state worse.

Please tell me you remote viewed one of your girlfriends getting it on with some other dude, and this was the wellspring of your theory about women. That would dovetail so perfectly.
12/13/2007 8:21:20 PM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


You'd be wrong.  We experimented with it and had a moderate level of success.  The people doing it had severe mental issues afterwards, though.  Their accuracy exceeded chance by a statistically significant amount.
12/13/2007 8:22:40 PM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


Go ahead and say the whole truth, a number of the viewers solicited the service of exorcists afterwards.
12/13/2007 8:25:40 PM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


You'd be wrong.  We experimented with it and had a moderate level of success.  The people doing it had severe mental issues afterwards, though.  Their accuracy exceeded chance by a statistically significant amount.


let me guess, the devil did it?
12/13/2007 8:26:55 PM EDT
[#44]

Quoted:
Go here

$1 million bucks if you demonstrate this under scientific observation.

So far, no takers.


I like Art Bell as much as the next guy, but +1

If you can do it, prove it.  So far, a lot of talking and not much viewing.

12/13/2007 8:29:07 PM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


Just because the CIA may have experimented with it doesn't mean it is legitimate. Several police departments have worked with psychics like Sylvia Brown on murder and kidnapping cases. This doesn't mean she isn't full of shit.

Both of these examples ultimately yielded the same result: nothing.


True, but apparently there was testimony before congress that the CIA had achieved some limited success.


Of course, how else are they going to continue getting the project funded?
12/13/2007 8:30:26 PM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:
Remote viewing is like the predictions of Nostradamus.

Everything can be explained after the fact, but predictive value is nil.


http://www.remoteviewers.com/htms/updated/menus/samplsessions.htm

Really?   Results of single blind tests

What the person was given to look at:



What a Remote Viewer drew:



12/13/2007 8:31:03 PM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


You'd be wrong.  We experimented with it and had a moderate level of success.  The people doing it had severe mental issues afterwards, though.  Their accuracy exceeded chance by a statistically significant amount.


let me guess, the devil did it?


I didn't say that.
12/13/2007 8:35:40 PM EDT
[#48]
Read the book Psychic Warrior.

Army Ranger Officer got shot in the head and started having really weird mental issues.

He got referred via his shrink to the program.

I thought the book was very good and believable.

link
12/13/2007 8:37:11 PM EDT
[#49]
i read an article somewhere on it..and it carefully worded the fact that the "viewers" were never the same.
12/13/2007 8:41:03 PM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bullshit.

I'm comfortable saying it.


Right.

That's why the CIA had a program going for 24 years.

Remote viewing is possible.  It's not 100% reliable since it's hard to distinguish detail and some things you see are kinda... hazy.

I believe the CIA shut the program down because of the negative psychological side effects of remote viewing.  It's well known that people who experiment with remote viewing have some... issues afterwards.  Another reason could be that there's not really any way to verify what's being seen.  If you're seeing the inside of a nuke facility in North Korea... how can anyone know if you're actually seeing what you think you're seeing.  Remote viewing, by itself, isn't enough proof for intelligence gathering.

I experimented with it and had some side effects, myself.


Go ahead and say the whole truth, a number of the viewers solicited the service of exorcists afterwards.


And, most disturbingly, started voting for Democrats.
Previous Page
/ 5
Next Page