Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
9/17/2006 1:07:00 PM EDT
So I'm looking at my 1/48 model of the F-22 and the 20mmc annon has a diamond-shaped panel above the wing that is supposed to open to allow the gun to fire without compromising Stealth. Head-on however, there does not seem to be much clearnce for the shells to clear the wing by much, especially if fired while pulling G's. Could be an effect of the model and the scale, but there just doesn't seem to be much room there, given the thickness of the skin. So, is the gun retractable when not in use? Can't find any info on this...apparently, on the F-22 the cannon is an after-thought.
9/17/2006 1:10:24 PM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
So I'm looking at my 1/48 model of the F-22 and the 20mmc annon has a diamond-shaped panel above the wing that is supposed to open to allow the gun to fire without compromising Stealth. Head-on however, there does not seem to be much clearnce for the shells to clear the wing by much, especially if fired while pulling G's. Could be an effect of the model and the scale, but there just doesn't seem to be much room there, given the thickness of the skin. So, is the gun retractable when not in use? Can't find any info on this...apparently, on the F-22 the cannon is an after-thought.

I'm sure the engineers have it all figured out. And no, it was not an afterthought.


I personally love the "I noticed something on a model and I think it might be a problem" attitude.
9/17/2006 1:11:27 PM EDT
[#2]
Models are simplifications of reality.
9/17/2006 1:16:54 PM EDT
[#3]
I think you can chalk it up to the model not being able to fully replicate the contours of the jet. In the photos I've seen that clearly show the cannon port (and there really aren't that many), it looks like there's juuuuuuust enough room for the projectile to exit.
9/17/2006 1:24:05 PM EDT
[#4]
The gun is in a fixed position.


Gun door open



Gun firing.  Scroll to the right and you can see a tracer.




Looking for video of gun firing, I'll post it when I find it.

2A373
F-22 Crew Chief
2000 - 2005

9/17/2006 1:28:30 PM EDT
[#5]
1) The gun was designed in from day 1.

2) The gun is fixed.

3) The door opens inward. (doesn't look thast way to me though).

4) Stealth is compromised when the gun is fired. Stealth is not compromised when gun is not in use.

Answers from a friend who worked on the program.
9/17/2006 1:35:40 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
The gun is in a fixed position.


Gun door open

img164.imageshack.us/img164/7161/4002gundoor2zc1.jpg

Gun firing.  Scroll to the right and you can see a tracer.

img20.imageshack.us/img20/996/gunfiringsa3.jpg


Looking for video of gun firing, I'll post it when I find it.

2A373
F-22 Crew Chief
2000 - 2005




I'll see your toy 20mm pop gun and raise you a Mauser BK27 or GSh-30-1

ANdy
9/17/2006 1:40:19 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
So I'm looking at my 1/48 model of the F-22 and the 20mmc annon has a diamond-shaped panel above the wing that is supposed to open to allow the gun to fire without compromising Stealth. Head-on however, there does not seem to be much clearnce for the shells to clear the wing by much, especially if fired while pulling G's. Could be an effect of the model and the scale, but there just doesn't seem to be much room there, given the thickness of the skin. So, is the gun retractable when not in use? Can't find any info on this...apparently, on the F-22 the cannon is an after-thought.


You'll need exactly 20mm of clearance.  at 1/48 scale that's about half a milimeter.  The gun is also probably pointed up a couple of degrees.  It's going to look a little weird on a model.  I assure you, it works.  
Matt
9/17/2006 1:50:18 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
Models are simplifications of reality.

Simplifications leave out details. If a critical detail is small, it will be left out.

I just want to know what kind of ego it requires to think, hey I've found something on a model that years of testing hasn't found.
9/17/2006 1:55:47 PM EDT
[#9]
I really don't think the OP thought, even for a minute, that he had stumbled across some deep hidden truth about a massive flaw in the F-22 program. I think he was looking for more information about this particular feature that is not really well-rendered on the model.
9/17/2006 2:01:17 PM EDT
[#10]
Gun footage starting at 1:15.

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6412839466457907763&q=f-22&hl=en
9/17/2006 2:04:42 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Models are simplifications of reality.

Simplifications leave out details. If a critical detail is small, it will be left out.

I just want to know what kind of ego it requires to think, hey I've found something on a model that years of testing hasn't found.


Not near the ego it takes to be an ass to someone trying to understand how something works. Remember, there are no stupid questions.
9/17/2006 2:06:17 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
Gun footage starting at 1:15.

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6412839466457907763&q=f-22&hl=en
Wow! Thanks!
9/17/2006 2:08:50 PM EDT
[#13]
You mentioned shells.

All of our fighter aircraft in service at this time retain the empty shells internally so as to
avoid any chance of tossing one into an engine intake.


CJ
9/17/2006 2:10:57 PM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Models are simplifications of reality.

Simplifications leave out details. If a critical detail is small, it will be left out.

I just want to know what kind of ego it requires to think, hey I've found something on a model that years of testing hasn't found.


Not near the ego it takes to be an ass to someone trying to understand how something works. Remember, there are no stupid questions.
No stupid questions, just stupid people.
9/17/2006 2:13:17 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Models are simplifications of reality.

Simplifications leave out details. If a critical detail is small, it will be left out.

I just want to know what kind of ego it requires to think, hey I've found something on a model that years of testing hasn't found.


Not near the ego it takes to be an ass to someone trying to understand how something works. Remember, there are no stupid questions.
No stupid questions, just stupid people.


Gee, thanks mr. Garrison
9/17/2006 2:56:02 PM EDT
[#16]
So, I'm an asshole; no surprise to those who know me.

Here is an interesting reprint of an article that was first printed in 1991:
http://www.sci.fi/~fta/atf-2.htm
The gun was a requirement from the start. While absent from the prototype, I'm sure the designers had a good idea how they were going to implement the gun system. They would have had to reserve space and weight for it.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/docs/n20000112_000043.htm
9/17/2006 3:07:17 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
You mentioned shells.

All of our fighter aircraft in service at this time retain the empty shells internally so as to
avoid any chance of tossing one into an engine intake.


CJ


No, anything over 19mm is condidered to be a cannon, and if explosive their projectiles are called shells.

9/17/2006 3:09:07 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
I really don't think the OP thought, even for a minute, that he had stumbled across some deep hidden truth about a massive flaw in the F-22 program. I think he was looking for more information about this particular feature that is not really well-rendered on the model.


No, no I did think they had not though this through, and would saw through the wing with the first burst
9/17/2006 3:11:31 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

Quoted:
So I'm looking at my 1/48 model of the F-22 and the 20mmc annon has a diamond-shaped panel above the wing that is supposed to open to allow the gun to fire without compromising Stealth. Head-on however, there does not seem to be much clearnce for the shells to clear the wing by much, especially if fired while pulling G's. Could be an effect of the model and the scale, but there just doesn't seem to be much room there, given the thickness of the skin. So, is the gun retractable when not in use? Can't find any info on this...apparently, on the F-22 the cannon is an after-thought.


You'll need exactly 20mm of clearance.  at 1/48 scale that's about half a milimeter.  The gun is also probably pointed up a couple of degrees.  It's going to look a little weird on a model.  I assure you, it works.  
Matt


You see, I have have not been able to find that kind of info. That is very interesting! How many degrees is it tilted up, you think?
9/17/2006 3:16:25 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:


I'll see your toy 20mm pop gun and raise you a Mauser BK27 or GSh-30-1

ANdy


Trust Andy to chime in with them negative waves since it is American.

"Always with the negative waves Moriarty Andy, always with the negative waves.

Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?"
9/17/2006 3:21:22 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:


I'll see your toy 20mm pop gun and raise you a Mauser BK27 or GSh-30-1

ANdy


Trust Andy to chime in with them negative waves since it is American.

"Always with the negative waves Moriarty Andy, always with the negative waves.

Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?"


"Crap"
9/17/2006 3:33:44 PM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:


I'll see your toy 20mm pop gun and raise you a Mauser BK27 or GSh-30-1

ANdy


Trust Andy to chime in with them negative waves since it is American.

"Always with the negative waves Moriarty Andy, always with the negative waves.

Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?"

It's not negative. It's truthful. The 20mm seeks destruction by putting as many rounds in the target in as little time as possible. It's the 5.7mm of aircraft guns. The Mauser is the .45 of aircraft guns. A hit or two is all you need. Of course, that comes with a slower rate of fire.

Remember the M61 was developed in the 1950s. We didn't have laser range finders and high speed firecontrol computers, so they had to make up for the inexactness of the firecontrol solution with quantities of fire.
9/17/2006 3:35:00 PM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The gun is in a fixed position.


Gun door open

img164.imageshack.us/img164/7161/4002gundoor2zc1.jpg

Gun firing.  Scroll to the right and you can see a tracer.

img20.imageshack.us/img20/996/gunfiringsa3.jpg


Looking for video of gun firing, I'll post it when I find it.

2A373
F-22 Crew Chief
2000 - 2005




I'll see your toy 20mm pop gun and raise you a Mauser BK27 or GSh-30-1

ANdy


And I'll up you to a GAU-8.  
9/17/2006 4:01:57 PM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:


I'll see your toy 20mm pop gun and raise you a Mauser BK27 or GSh-30-1

ANdy


Trust Andy to chime in with them negative waves since it is American.

"Always with the negative waves Moriarty Andy, always with the negative waves.

Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?"



GSh-30-1 (30mm): Rate of fire: 1,500rpm. Weight of projectile: 14.1 oz.

BK-27 (27mm) Rate of fire: 1,700rpm. Weight of projectile: 9.2 oz.

M61 (20mm): Rate of fire: 6,000rpm. Weight of projectile: 3.5 oz.


It takes an M61 @ a second to spin up to it's full 6,000 rpm. The BK-27's rate of fire is 'instantaneous'. After 0.5 secs, the BK-27 has put twice the weight of shell down range than the M61 which catches up after 1 second. A couple of hits from projectiles @ 30mm will knock the wing off most fighters at a significantly longer range and single barrelled cannon are intrinsically more accurate than a gatling type gun.

ANdy
9/17/2006 4:08:53 PM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Trust Andy to chime in with them negative waves since it is American.

"Always with the negative waves Moriarty Andy, always with the negative waves.

Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?"


"Crap"
9/17/2006 4:56:16 PM EDT
[#26]
I now a thing or two about the M61A1 gun..

Aviation Ordnance!!!

IYAOYAS
9/17/2006 4:58:48 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:
I now a thing or two about the M61A1 gun..

Aviation Ordnance!!!

IYAOYAS


Now, we need to discuss spelling - haha!
Matt

IYCSYAS

(If You Can't Spell, You Ain't Shit) haha
9/17/2006 5:48:08 PM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
Gun footage starting at 1:15.

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6412839466457907763&q=f-22&hl=en


That's some pretty cool vid!