User Panel
Posted: 8/19/2017 1:33:58 PM EDT
Attached File
Those of you who have actually shot and handled one. What did you think of it? It is made by FN, and has a good reputation for reliability and toughness. And with the ejection forward. It seems like the best option. As it can be spontaneously fired from either should and no brass in your mouth. |
|
It's a fun toy. Manual of arms is a bit different. I use my SBR AR for home defense.
|
|
It looks bulkier than it is. Still, to me it was like shouldering a suitcase. It's quirky, and not without its flaws, but overall I liked mine and wish I'd held onto it.
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84024/IMG_0356-284406.JPG Those of you who have actually shot and handled one. What did you think of it? It is made by FN, and has a good reputation for reliability and toughness. And with the ejection forward. It seems like the best option. As it can be spontaneously fired from either should and no brass in your mouth. View Quote RIP your avatar. |
|
I never got past the handling part, felt very "chubby" which I didn't like. Local range had a rental that reportedly ran well but was often returned with a round in the chamber(!).
Definitely handle one before you buy. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84024/IMG_0356-284406.JPG Those of you who have actually shot and handled one. What did you think of it? It is made by FN, and has a good reputation for reliability and toughness. And with the ejection forward. It seems like the best option. As it can be spontaneously fired from either should and no brass in your mouth. RIP your avatar. |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84024/IMG_0356-284406.JPG Those of you who have actually shot and handled one. What did you think of it? It is made by FN, and has a good reputation for reliability and toughness. And with the ejection forward. It seems like the best option. As it can be spontaneously fired from either should and no brass in your mouth. View Quote I don't fault the gun, like most would think. I believed the problem yo be metalugical. That said, I did lose confidence in the platform. Oh, the rounds were m855 LC. |
|
|
|
Friend of mine has one... I like the ergonomics quite a bit, but the trigger is a bit lacking compared to the newest Tavors. Just my .02.
I certainly wouldn't kick one out of my safe... |
|
I sold mine. I love bullpups & the concept, but it had the ergonomics of a 2x6.
YMMV |
|
Dropping empty shells directly underfoot...what could go wrong???
|
|
FN were really forward thinking in having the front ejection, and bottom ejection on the P90 which solved the main issue people have with bullpups. I wish more manufactures would try to improve on that.
I love bullpups and am enamored with my X95 and KSG. I don't shoot left shoulder much but that's just a residual training from my time in the military. I wasn't taught that. |
|
I had one and really liked it except for the fact that I have really big hands and the thumb hole design grip was on comfortable.
It ran flawlessly with a mix of ammo, if my hands were not so big I would still have it. |
|
I'm a huge bullpup fan, it's my #2 - AUG is #1, Tavor is #3, maybe dropping to #4 with the RDB.
They do appear to be discontinued, so get 'em while the getting is good. |
|
I love mine! I've said it before, it is wrong in every way but FN made it work. It does look bulky and kind of is, but it is also very well balanced and comfortable and the bulkiness tends to melt away when your running it. It is reliable and smooth shooting. Its lower on my go-to list for issues that are largely minor but slinging options are crappy as are mounting grips and/or lights, the trigger is awful, and the rear sight is unusable. The dust cover popping open and dumping empties is as fun to hear to me as the ping of my Garand. There really isn't anything quite like it.
|
|
I have one of the first fifty imported and used to shoot it a lot in practical rifle matches out to about 250 yds.
Best case its prob a 2-3 moa rifle but it was dead nuts reliable for me over several thousand round with no cleaning and outdoor sand and rain use. The heavy trigger doesn't help long range accuracy but for cqb type use it was fantastic. It's not an AR as far as parts, config options, etc but I trust it more than most frankenguns out there and I never even had to use the adverse gas setting. I really wish they had used a less severe rake on the grip though (and I actually like the glock grip angle) but it's very slick plastic and doesn't fall into your hand like the AUG which is perfection. |
|
|
I owned one for about 3 months.
I liked it, it was fun and quirky. But I traded it for a Tavor and got $300 on top from a guy at my range. He loved the FS2K way more and I loved the Tavor way more. I can't articulate why I didn't love the FN. It just didn't feel special to me. No regrets for either of us. |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84024/IMG_0356-284406.JPG Those of you who have actually shot and handled one. What did you think of it? It is made by FN, and has a good reputation for reliability and toughness. And with the ejection forward. It seems like the best option. As it can be spontaneously fired from either should and no brass in your mouth. View Quote I like mine. It's a good shooter and easy to handle. After I lubed up the magwell with silicone spray lubricant, the mags dropped easily. Having to put both feet on the gun and yank with both hands to get the mag out got old quickly until the lube. |
|
Have one of the contract overruns from 8-9 years back and paid $1100 for it. It's probably not my favorite bullpup (that's the X95), but I like it better than the AUG and the Tar-21. It's extremely reliable and ergonomic, not as bulky as it looks and built as a .mil rifle. It's robust and I'd have no problem trusting my life to it (unlike some bench-built guns). If you can snag one for under $1500, it's a steal. Anything above that and you have to ask yourself if you'd be better served by a higher-range AR or another gen 3-4 rifle, like a Bren or Tavor/X-95.
|
|
Fairly accurate. Very dependable. Utterly shit trigger. Hard on your index finger when doing mag changes.
Other than THAT...pretty cool gun. |
|
Very nice gun, as accurate as your average AR, very compact, easy to transport in vehicles, the forward ejection is nice.
I sold mine to another member here due to the NY SAFE act. |
|
|
|
I worked with a foreign unit that had the full auto version, and got to fire it.
I think it would take some getting used to, due to the shape and manual of arms. It just seemed awkward. I like being able to switch shoulders, especially in an urban environment, and a bullpup makes that tough. The full auto was kind of funky, too. Flip the selector to full auto, pull the trigger, then after the first round fired, pull the trigger farther back (not a second separate pull) to get more rounds fired. I fired the Australian Steyr AUG (can't remember what they call it) and I think its full auto was the same way. I'm just so used to the M16/ M4/ AR that it probably taints my experience with other weapons. |
|
Shot 90 rounds suppressed at a MG shoot a few years ago.
This rifle was getting no rest and at least 8-10 people shot before me. The paint was peeling off the suppressor. It ran like a top for me. Loved it. Felt good in the hands. Didn't they have a problem with broken charging handles? |
|
I like mine, it's fun, and capable. Not my first choice to grab if I needed it for serious purposes, but it's not off the list.
Mag choices are limited, but I can accept that. |
|
|
|
|
Tactical Tuna.... At least that is what we called it back in BF3.
|
|
I've always wanted to ask-- what goes in that space behind the magazine in the stock.
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/84024/IMG_0356-284406.JPG Those of you who have actually shot and handled one. What did you think of it? It is made by FN, and has a good reputation for reliability and toughness. And with the ejection forward. It seems like the best option. As it can be spontaneously fired from either should and no brass in your mouth. View Quote Felt like shooting a loaf of bread, trigger was, meh,.... but the red dot on the target barely moved while I was railing the shit out of it. The only gun I have fired that comes close is one of those Grail-15's. |
|
they feel less comfy than an AUg and they are front heavy because of the design. A good bullpup should be designed to balance on the pistol grip and it doesn't.
but what it does do is drop empties out the front, and that is the only reason to buy one other than for collection. I had one briefly and has to sell it. Get an AUG if you want a good bullpup. Get a Keltec if you are curious. Unless you can get a FS2000 for less than 1300 I would steer clear because there is no market for them. |
|
We got a one into Gander when i worked there. I took it out of the box to put it in the computer and yanked on the bolt. It broke. I have it to the gun tech to fix and it was still waiting on parts when i left a year later.
|
|
Meh I'd rather have a Tavor. I've never really got into the looks of it.
|
|
|
Had one, about 5 years ago, awesome little carbine. Can't use pmags.
I'll pick one up again eventually. While I don't currently have anything fn. Pretty much everything they do is good to go. |
|
|
Quoted:
LOL ill buy all the 1300 Tunas I can find They are 1800+ rifles in today's market View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Unless you can get a FS2000 for less than 1300 I would steer clear because there is no market for them. ill buy all the 1300 Tunas I can find They are 1800+ rifles in today's market That is why they didnt sell any the first time around... The point of moulding guns insteads of CNCing them is to make them really cheap to produce. FN probably makes them for 40 bucks apiece. |
|
I can't add much more to what everyone has posted here. I enjoy mine
Stock mag sucks. Mine does not like Tula. It binds up so I just use Federal XM 193 and I'm good to go. It is a conversation starter at the range for sure. |
|
I had one I liked everything about it accept the terrible trigger
|
|
Quoted:
Stock mag sucks. View Quote ETA: I was never a fan of the original integrated optic and handguard. When the "tactical" flavor came out with top-rail and tri-rail handguard though it began to grow on me.... |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.