Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; [red]nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [/red]
Seems that if the Consitution talks about fair compensation for property taken for public use the FF's felt that it was within the scope of governmental power to convert private property to public use.
I don;t like property owners being "condemend" so a private developer can re-develop the property, ie the strip mall. That seems like private property taken for private use under the "color" of the government's authority.
It's tough, because you have to balance the desires of "the people" to have good road, direct routes, enough lanes etc. vs the private person who has the Right to be secure in their property. Of cousre there will always be someone who thinks and interstate should have to curve around their property...........