Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/24/2017 4:44:23 PM
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Posted: 10/22/2004 5:54:52 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/22/2004 5:55:22 AM EST by HiramRanger]
Link Posted: 10/22/2004 5:58:22 AM EST
Hiram, let me suggest saving the entirety of the articles somewhere, as well as a screen capture.

I don't put it past anyone to discreetly remove damaging accounts of voter fraud if it comes down to the wire, and looks like their boy pulled a fast one.
Link Posted: 10/22/2004 5:59:14 AM EST
Link Posted: 10/22/2004 6:06:29 AM EST
I am taking a camera with me to the polling place.
Link Posted: 10/22/2004 6:08:18 AM EST
Here, I'll save you the trouble:


billhobbs.com/hobbsonline/cat_voter_fraud.html

Link Posted: 10/22/2004 6:08:43 AM EST
Link Posted: 10/22/2004 6:12:30 AM EST
here's a column by a Milwaukee conservative talk radio host:

http://www.gmtoday.com/milwaukeetoday/editorials/belling.asp



Milwaukee’s mayor and election commission director are getting the 938,000 ballots they demanded. That’s nearly 700,000 more than the number of people who voted four years ago and 550,000 more - or 268 percent - than the number of registered voters in the city. When Milwaukee County originally proposed giving the city "only" 679,000 ballots - or 180 percent more than the number of registered voters - Gov. Jim Doyle demanded a state investigation and asked if "voter suppression" was going on.

Waukesha County officials recently announced that municipalities will be given 15 percent more ballots than the number of registered voters. How come Doyle hasn’t raised any questions about "voter suppression" there? In Doyle’s world, giving a Democratic area 180 percent more ballots than voters is "suppression" but providing only 15 percent more ballots than voters in a Republican area is not suppression.

* * *


Link Posted: 10/22/2004 6:18:09 AM EST
Top Top