Dogs and California

Site Notices

Posted: 8/7/2005 5:13:05 PM EDT

I just saw on the news that California SF mayor wants to ban Rotts and Pitt Bulls because they are dangerous?

WTF, what about holding the owners accountable for the actions of their pet? First Guns, now dogs? What's next? SUV's and sports cars?

I am so glad that I left that liberal state.

Max

Posted: 8/7/2005 6:54:11 PM EDT

[#1]

Denver just did the same thing. Not only did they ban them, they went around & confiscated & destroyed the ones they could find; mean dogs or family pets.

I'd shoot the first bureaucratic bastard who attempted to take my dog from me.

Posted: 8/7/2005 6:56:17 PM EDT

[#2]

Don't worry. With other dogs and pets they have a special "health care" ordinances where you can get HEAVY fines if the dog doesnt have FRESH water ( 3x a day)

Sgat1r5

Posted: 8/7/2005 7:07:59 PM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:
I just saw on the news that California SF mayor wants to ban Rotts and Pitt Bulls because they are dangerous?

WTF, what about holding the owners accountable for the actions of their pet? First Guns, now dogs? What's next? SUV's and sports cars?

I am so glad that I left that liberal state.

Max

I wonder if someone could get PETA to file a rascism or discrimination lawsuit?

Posted: 8/7/2005 7:08:57 PM EDT

[#4]

they would have to destroy me before they could take my dog.

Posted: 8/7/2005 7:09:37 PM EDT

[#5]

SF? You know that heterosexuality is next to be banned.

No PDA with a member of the opposite sex because it is "offensive".

Posted: 8/7/2005 7:52:01 PM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
I just saw on the news that California SF mayor wants to ban Rotts and Pitt Bulls because they are dangerous?

WTF, what about holding the owners accountable for the actions of their pet? First Guns, now dogs? What's next? SUV's and sports cars?

I am so glad that I left that liberal state.

Max

So are we. Most grown-ups just ignore San Francisco for the most part, if we didn't allow them to have their little freedoms to say and do stupid things the world would be a duller place. Besides every so often they come up with something you might agree with. Remember Carol Doda? if it wasn't for her and San Francisco, most guys here wouldn't do anything on Friday and Saturday nights but read.

Posted: 8/7/2005 7:54:33 PM EDT

[#7]

Denver and Miami have bans IIRC.

Posted: 8/7/2005 7:59:29 PM EDT

[#8]

Houston too!

Breed Specific Legislation in Texas

From Responsible Pet Owners Alliance
Texas HB 1096 BSL

HB 1096 will exempt the city of Houston from the current state law prohibiting Breed Specific Legislation in Texas!

Representative Al Edwards has told RPOA that he wants to pass Breed Specific
Legislation regarding Rottweilers and so-called “Pit Bulls” in the city of
Houston. Since existing Texas law prohibits this, Edwards said he wants to
exempt Houston from the existing law. He has ignored RPOA and AKC letters
of opposition and phone calls and filed HB 1096 in spite of our protests.
Edwards stated to the media that he hopes his bill will be amended to
include the entire state. At the present time, it only applies to a
municipality with a population of 1.9 million or more. This will include
San Antonio (population 1.4 million now) in the not-too-distant future.
Edwards’ bill is cleverly written and the significance of it is easily
overlooked if you don’t reference current state law. HB 1096 establishes
Subchapter F. Regulation of Dogs in Certain Municipalities.
BUT it states under (b): SUBCHAPTER D [IN CURRENT LAW] DOES NOT APPLY TO A
MUNICIPALITY SUBJECT TO THIS CHAPTER. Subchapter D is where current law
prohibits Breed Specific Legislation being passed in Texas municipalities.
This is confusing but read it carefully.

HB 1096 clears the way to pass BSL in Texas. One more time: Houston will
not be subject to our state law prohibiting BSL in municipalities if this
law passes. Houston could ban or restrict ownership of certain dog breeds.

Posted: 8/7/2005 8:03:51 PM EDT

[#9]

But it is so much more PC to complain about CA and old news. Besides getting excited about a "wants to" is easier than complaining about enacted bans in the cowboy states.

Posted: 8/7/2005 8:11:59 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
I just saw on the news that California SF mayor wants to ban Rotts and Pitt Bulls because they are dangerous?

WTF, what about holding the owners accountable for the actions of their pet? First Guns, now dogs? What's next? SUV's and sports cars?

I am so glad that I left that liberal state.

Max

Didn't you hear? San Francisco and Los Angeles are no longer part of the Great State of California. We banned them and thier liberal shitstain citizens. We are now the most Conservative State in the Union.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Dogs and California

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us