Do you qualify to date this tech exec? (Page 6 of 8)
Joined:
Jun 2025
Posts:
3958
EE: 100% (57)
UT, USA
|
Originally Posted By ramairthree: She has joined the legion of women from 29-39 who are all like -“Oh shit I need a good man without a divorce or kids under their belt who is smart, motivated, educated, has a braggable career, is affluent, fit, and good looking to marry me and father my children ASAP.” All those guys are already taken, married, fathers, straight up dodging marriage/kids, or gay. Im in my late 30’s have never been married, no kids, sold a business after I was focused on that. Did I fuck up “the one” being gone all the time and deciding a bottle was more important. Sure did. It’s been a few years and I got my shit together and gave up the booze (it was going to kill me). I was a selfish prick and have to catch myself every so often still. The dating pool is interesting and I understand I am anomaly which I would see as a red flag. A lot of these women bring nothing to the table and want all these things. On the flip side there are of course good women out there. The whole Lindsay Clancy thing brought out some true colors of people and I am taking a break from dating.  I always said I did not really want to have kids (or get married for that matter) due to seeing some crap I rather would not have, turns out I was just scared I would mess that up to. I believe we are meant to have a family, I truly believe that now. 🤷🏼♂️ I think with all things YMMV. |
|
Originally Posted By Emeoba69: Yeah I took it as well off enough not to be only chasing money, but still well off. I do think it’s hypocritical the push is for “traditional values” with gender roles with the man being the protector/provider and then jump down their throats when they suggest the guy be well off to provide for them. Sounds like she wants what most would consider to be a traditional man... all of the sudden GD has a problem with that. |
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
|
Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: Exactly. Sounds like she wants what most would consider to be a traditional man... all of the sudden GD has a problem with that. Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: Originally Posted By Emeoba69: Yeah I took it as well off enough not to be only chasing money, but still well off. I do think it’s hypocritical the push is for “traditional values” with gender roles with the man being the protector/provider and then jump down their throats when they suggest the guy be well off to provide for them. Exactly. Sounds like she wants what most would consider to be a traditional man... all of the sudden GD has a problem with that. But...........is she a ''traditional'' woman? |
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
|
Looks like she fails the "hasn't had more sausage than an Octoberfest food stall" requirement on my list. |
|
Originally Posted By Eponymous: She’s looking for a 38-year-old, fit, sober, childless, never-married tech mogul who has made enough money to retire forever, but still wakes up at 5:00 AM to grind out of sheer passion. He needs to have the strength of a silverback gorilla, the gentle empathy of a licensed family therapist, and a bookshelf full of self-help retreats—yet somehow zero emotional baggage from any past engagements or long-term relationships. To wrap it up, this post-economic, ultra-masculine monk must also conveniently live within a 15-minute drive of her front door, be ready to have kids immediately, and spend his free time being deeply, lightheartedly generous. He’s currently unavailable—he’s in the middle of a ten-day silent retreat inside a titanium yurt, totally unaware she posted this. 
|
|
Originally Posted By Toasted: That's a new way of saying it. Haven't heard that one before. Does that mean poors are pre economic? Originally Posted By Toasted: Originally Posted By Aimless: Originally Posted By HRoark87: I'm assuming post economic means rich. That's a new way of saying it. Haven't heard that one before. Does that mean poors are pre economic? Young kids are pre-economic. Poors are balls deep in the economy, living paycheck to paycheck. |
|
Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: I think it’s hilarious how betas defend women for living like men but women aren’t subject to the draft. You want to live like a man? Fine but equal rights come with equal responsibility. A women who never married and has a career shouldn’t get special treatment for equality for this but not for that. Sorry, you have to hit that Chinese beach with a rifle the same as those men you wanted to emulate! At least they're consistent. The worst traitors are the "conservatives" who are pro traditional roles until it comes to their little angel. They raise her to be a strong independent woman and no man is good enough. That's where women get this mindset. Retarded/absent fathers. |
|
Originally Posted By fxntime: But...........is she a ''traditional'' woman? Originally Posted By fxntime: Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: Originally Posted By Emeoba69: Yeah I took it as well off enough not to be only chasing money, but still well off. I do think it’s hypocritical the push is for “traditional values” with gender roles with the man being the protector/provider and then jump down their throats when they suggest the guy be well off to provide for them. Exactly. Sounds like she wants what most would consider to be a traditional man... all of the sudden GD has a problem with that. But...........is she a ''traditional'' woman? 
|
Joined:
Dec 2024
Posts:
1543
EE: 100% (3)
VA, USA
|
Originally Posted By Scott-S6: She is the table and how dare you ask, is the usual response. Originally Posted By Scott-S6: Originally Posted By staringback05: And not a damn thing about what she brings to the table.... She is the table and how dare you ask, is the usual response. This works until it's the .001% man she's talking about.  The kind waitress at his golf club is every bit as capable of enjoying the Range Rover he buys her, as "Tech Exec" McHowManyEmployeesDoesThisExecHave internet-thot bossbabe.
|
|
Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: It's a nonsense term so it really doesn't mean anything. It could mean anything from "successful career" to multi-millionaire. Never heard the term until now and yes it's nonsense. But the definition I'm seeing is a person who has moved beyond the need to prioritize financial concerns. So you have so much money that you no longer have to care about it. The amount varies by region. Since she is in silicon valley, there is no way in hell she is talking about someone with a net worth under a million. It doesn't bother me that she has these standards. The problem is this person she requires does not exist. And if he did; he could do better than her. |
|
Originally Posted By Lexington: I am amazed at all of the cavemen here who think women must be married in their 20's in order to be fulfilled. She is to crank out children for a guy who ... picked a career and is giving his best years to his employer. Men and women are different, biologically. Cavemen that understand this are passing on their genes successfully. The "enlightened" are going extinct, thank God. In two generations, my nation of grandchildren will tell stories of the crazy cult that killed itself with silly ideas in the before-fore time. |
|
Originally Posted By autumnsong: She has a very pretty face. My guess is that she will back off all those requirements if she meets a man with a big fat wallet. Money compensates for many flaws: age, height, weight, penis size, previous marriages, children from previous marriages etc.
|
|
Originally Posted By Lexington: And why do you care so much about that? Originally Posted By Lexington: Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By Lexington: I am amazed at all of the cavemen here who think women must be married in their 20's in order to be fulfilled. A woman’s fertility starts dropping as she turns 30 and accelerates from there. All “muh equality” and “muh feels” in the world won’t change this basic biological fact. Equality is a false god. And why do you care so much about that? Evolution. Darwinian natural selection. Progeny. The first commandment God gave fallen man. All pretty significant reasons for fertility to matter in mate selection. Not sure what sort of religion you have to adopt for that to not be obvious. |
|
Originally Posted By ManMan: I have this master ability to look things I don't know up .... Definition of Post-Economic Dating Post-economic dating is a concept that emphasizes personal choice and intrinsic value in relationships, moving away from traditional dating norms and economic transactions. It focuses on the importance of personal connections and mutual select So really, her requirements looks quite reasonable. Originally Posted By ManMan: I have this master ability to look things I don't know up .... Definition of Post-Economic Dating Post-economic dating is a concept that emphasizes personal choice and intrinsic value in relationships, moving away from traditional dating norms and economic transactions. It focuses on the importance of personal connections and mutual select So really, her requirements looks quite reasonable. “Post-economic” It’s a term I’d hear a lot in Silicon Valley. It refers to a person who’s moved beyond the need to prioritize financial concerns in their decision making or lifestyle. Economic considerations are no longer a constraint. There’s not really a set number, it just means money is no object to them, and they live their life accordingly. I personally think it’s as much of a state of mind as it is number. Can mean $5M, or $500M depending on lifestyle and priorities. |
In real life these things don't happen much at all
It's too bad we all live the dream
It's too bad we all live the dream
|
Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: I think it’s hilarious how betas defend women for living like men but women aren’t subject to the draft. You want to live like a man? Fine but equal rights come with equal responsibility. A women who never married and has a career shouldn’t get special treatment for equality for this but not for that. Sorry, you have to hit that Chinese beach with a rifle the same as those men you wanted to emulate! Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: Found the gIrL dAd  You want to live like a man? Fine but equal rights come with equal responsibility. A women who never married and has a career shouldn’t get special treatment for equality for this but not for that. Sorry, you have to hit that Chinese beach with a rifle the same as those men you wanted to emulate! That’s some pretty interesting mental gymnastics. |
Direction, not intention, determines destination.
Integrity is the essence of everything successful.
Integrity is the essence of everything successful.
|
Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: Never heard the term until now and yes it's nonsense. But the definition I'm seeing is a person who has moved beyond the need to prioritize financial concerns. So you have so much money that you no longer have to care about it. The amount varies by region. Since she is in silicon valley, there is no way in hell she is talking about someone with a net worth under a million. It doesn't bother me that she has these standards. The problem is this person she requires does not exist. And if he did; he could do better than her. |
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
Now fellate me, as I eat this expensive ham.
Joined:
Aug 2007
Posts:
48672
EE: 100% (161)
USA
|
Honestly most of it looks reasonable. The healing path stuff is retarded, and says a lot more about her than it does her potential match The post-economic terminology is odd. I work in a similar market on the West Coast and this is the first time I've ever heard the term in professional or dating circles. Maybe it's the polite way of saying she's looking for a guy that's loaded. . . . If she's a silicon valley tech exec (at a real company not some inflated title startup) then maybe she's just looking for parity. |
Look, yes, I have banged HUNDREDS of broads. INTERNATIONALLY. But know this - I wrap my rascal, TWO TIMES, cuz I like it to be joyless and without sensation. It's a way of punishing supermodels.
|
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08: That’s some pretty interesting mental gymnastics. Originally Posted By Foxtrot08: Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: Found the gIrL dAd You want to live like a man? Fine but equal rights come with equal responsibility. A women who never married and has a career shouldn’t get special treatment for equality for this but not for that. Sorry, you have to hit that Chinese beach with a rifle the same as those men you wanted to emulate! That’s some pretty interesting mental gymnastics. Declare war, institute the draft for all males and females between 18-35 and there would be a baby boom that would make all others look like pikers. And I'm not kidding either. |
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
|
Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: The real problem is the ambiguity in the term. You think this man doesn't exist because you've assigned a meaning to it. You very well could be right. You may also be wrong. I make enough that I don't worry about money, but I make a lot less than that. Am I post economic? Who knows. Only her, and she's not telling which is annoying. I meet most of those requirements, including post economic. I would not see her as a serious long term dating prospect. |
|
Originally Posted By fxntime: Declare war, institute the draft for all males and females between 18-35 and there would be a baby boom that would make all others look like pikers. And I'm not kidding either. Originally Posted By fxntime: Originally Posted By Foxtrot08: Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: Found the gIrL dAd You want to live like a man? Fine but equal rights come with equal responsibility. A women who never married and has a career shouldn’t get special treatment for equality for this but not for that. Sorry, you have to hit that Chinese beach with a rifle the same as those men you wanted to emulate! That’s some pretty interesting mental gymnastics. Declare war, institute the draft for all males and females between 18-35 and there would be a baby boom that would make all others look like pikers. And I'm not kidding either. I have a different perspective. But I was mostly going off his general posts. |
Direction, not intention, determines destination.
Integrity is the essence of everything successful.
Integrity is the essence of everything successful.
|
Originally Posted By M855Bukkake: Evolution. Darwinian natural selection. Progeny. The first commandment God gave fallen man. All pretty significant reasons for fertility to matter in mate selection. Not sure what sort of religion you have to adopt for that to not be obvious. It’s a weird thing internet think has glommed onto because it can be framed in sciency terms. I assume the guys that have been harping on this the past few years either didn’t have kids in this timeframe or possibly didn’t even DATE women in this timeframe. I look at my parents. My mom was 24 when she married my dad and didn’t start having kids until they were established 4 years later (read: able to support a family without leeching off the government), a year shy of the supposedly spent girl in the OP, and 38 when she had my little brother. Both parents worked. No worse for wear but somehow detestable because it didn’t happen between the ages of 16 and 22, tHe PeAk AgEs of FeRtIlItY! There is optimal and there is reality. Reality is, beyond the bossbabe nonsense, two parents working and waiting until they are established financially is the reality in the financial world we live in unless you want to live on government subsidies. You can blame women for entering the workforce and competing for jobs with men, wage growth and the middle class was actually gutted when we offshored our entire manufacturing base and anything else to chase quarterly earnings. |
|
Originally Posted By rb889: Bad fathers/mothers create this bullshit, not boyfriends or husbands, despite what the self-important, narcissistic cunts will tell you. Look at a woman's parents, and their relationship dynamics. That will get you 95% certainty of your future with a given individual. I use to believe this. The last GF proved this theory to be wrong. The Mrs had a horrible upbringing with terrible parents. Great at being a wife. |
American by birth. Southern by the grace of God.
Any opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect upon any agency or organization with which I may be employed or affiliated.
Any opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect upon any agency or organization with which I may be employed or affiliated.
|
Originally Posted By ElSupremo: She's definitely one that needs the five position switch implanted in the small of her back. 1. FUCK 2. SUCK 3. COOK 4. CLEAN 5. OFF Upon completion of any of the first 4 selections the switch automatically reverts to OFF.  Why no hunt or fish switch? Both are things I dearly miss about the wife. I could burn a whole day on the lake with her and even If I never caught a single thing, would have a blast. |
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
|
Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Men and women are different. A woman’s fertility starts dropping as she turns 30 and accelerates from there. All “muh equality” and “muh feels” in the world won’t change this basic biological fact. Equality is a false god. Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By Lexington: I am amazed at all of the cavemen here who think women must be married in their 20's in order to be fulfilled. A woman’s fertility starts dropping as she turns 30 and accelerates from there. All “muh equality” and “muh feels” in the world won’t change this basic biological fact. Equality is a false god. Unless you’re planning on having 6+ kids, starting to have kids in your 30s is just fine. Most folks are having 1-3 kids these days, and that can be accomplished by the age of 33 even if you start when you’re 30. |
24/365 Most Portable
24/365 Most Likely to Outshoot Her Spouse
24/365 Most Likely to Eat Your Heart
Somewhere you jumped the monogomy shark and landed in beastiality - Stickfigure
24/365 Most Likely to Outshoot Her Spouse
24/365 Most Likely to Eat Your Heart
Somewhere you jumped the monogomy shark and landed in beastiality - Stickfigure
|
Originally Posted By Naamah: Unless you’re planning on having 6+ kids, starting to have kids in your 30s is just fine. Most folks are having 1-3 kids these days, and that can be accomplished by the age of 33 even if you start when you’re 30. Originally Posted By Naamah: Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By Lexington: I am amazed at all of the cavemen here who think women must be married in their 20's in order to be fulfilled. A woman’s fertility starts dropping as she turns 30 and accelerates from there. All “muh equality” and “muh feels” in the world won’t change this basic biological fact. Equality is a false god. Unless you’re planning on having 6+ kids, starting to have kids in your 30s is just fine. Most folks are having 1-3 kids these days, and that can be accomplished by the age of 33 even if you start when you’re 30. That is correct but starting at 30 husband hunting is the precursor to dating, engagement, the deed [wedding] and usually the honeymoon period unless a rich smart man decides to throw all caution to the wind and do a 3 month date and marry scenario, and rich smart men don't tend to do that. [unless you are Elon Musk ]
|
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
|
Originally Posted By fxntime: That is correct but starting at 30 husband hunting is the precursor to dating, engagement, the deed [wedding] and usually the honeymoon period unless a rich smart man decides to throw all caution to the wind and do a 3 month date and marry scenario, and rich smart men don't tend to do that. [unless you are Elon Musk ]Originally Posted By fxntime: Originally Posted By Naamah: Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By Lexington: I am amazed at all of the cavemen here who think women must be married in their 20's in order to be fulfilled. A woman’s fertility starts dropping as she turns 30 and accelerates from there. All “muh equality” and “muh feels” in the world won’t change this basic biological fact. Equality is a false god. Unless you’re planning on having 6+ kids, starting to have kids in your 30s is just fine. Most folks are having 1-3 kids these days, and that can be accomplished by the age of 33 even if you start when you’re 30. That is correct but starting at 30 husband hunting is the precursor to dating, engagement, the deed [wedding] and usually the honeymoon period unless a rich smart man decides to throw all caution to the wind and do a 3 month date and marry scenario, and rich smart men don't tend to do that. [unless you are Elon Musk ]I mean… worked for me. Took 4 years though. |
Direction, not intention, determines destination.
Integrity is the essence of everything successful.
Integrity is the essence of everything successful.
|
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08: I mean… worked for me. Took 4 years though. Originally Posted By Foxtrot08: Originally Posted By fxntime: Originally Posted By Naamah: Originally Posted By PeoplesRepublicOfIL: Originally Posted By Lexington: I am amazed at all of the cavemen here who think women must be married in their 20's in order to be fulfilled. A woman’s fertility starts dropping as she turns 30 and accelerates from there. All “muh equality” and “muh feels” in the world won’t change this basic biological fact. Equality is a false god. Unless you’re planning on having 6+ kids, starting to have kids in your 30s is just fine. Most folks are having 1-3 kids these days, and that can be accomplished by the age of 33 even if you start when you’re 30. That is correct but starting at 30 husband hunting is the precursor to dating, engagement, the deed [wedding] and usually the honeymoon period unless a rich smart man decides to throw all caution to the wind and do a 3 month date and marry scenario, and rich smart men don't tend to do that. [unless you are Elon Musk ]I mean… worked for me. Took 4 years though. 2 years is the start to weed out the bi-polars and BPD's, 4 years is a very good time frame and well worth it if you both get a very good partner for life. |
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
|
Originally Posted By Eponymous: She’s looking for a 38-year-old, fit, sober, childless, never-married tech mogul who has made enough money to retire forever, but still wakes up at 5:00 AM to grind out of sheer passion. He needs to have the strength of a silverback gorilla, the gentle empathy of a licensed family therapist, and a bookshelf full of self-help retreats—yet somehow zero emotional baggage from any past engagements or long-term relationships. To wrap it up, this post-economic, ultra-masculine monk must also conveniently live within a 15-minute drive of her front door, be ready to have kids immediately, and spend his free time being deeply, lightheartedly generous. He’s currently unavailable—he’s in the middle of a ten-day silent retreat inside a titanium yurt, totally unaware she posted this. Attached File |
Member
Joined:
Jul 2023
Posts:
10299
EE: 0% (0)
WA, USA
|
Most of the list is reasonable other than the "post economic" and "healing path" gobblygook. More people should be honest about they want so they don't have to count on luck. Caring about health is a good one. Lots of people turn into blobs after marriage and it really limits quality of life over time. |
|
Originally Posted By Emeoba69: It’s a weird thing internet think has glommed onto because it can be framed in sciency terms. I assume the guys that have been harping on this the past few years either didn’t have kids in this timeframe or possibly didn’t even DATE women in this timeframe. I look at my parents. My mom was 24 when she married my dad and didn’t start having kids until they were established 4 years later (read: able to support a family without leeching off the government), a year shy of the supposedly spent girl in the OP, and 38 when she had my little brother. Both parents worked. No worse for wear but somehow detestable because it didn’t happen between the ages of 16 and 22, tHe PeAk AgEs of FeRtIlItY! There is optimal and there is reality. Reality is, beyond the bossbabe nonsense, two parents working and waiting until they are established financially is the reality in the financial world we live in unless you want to live on government subsidies. You can blame women for entering the workforce and competing for jobs with men, wage growth and the middle class was actually gutted when we offshored our entire manufacturing base and anything else to chase quarterly earnings. Originally Posted By Emeoba69: Originally Posted By M855Bukkake: Evolution. Darwinian natural selection. Progeny. The first commandment God gave fallen man. All pretty significant reasons for fertility to matter in mate selection. Not sure what sort of religion you have to adopt for that to not be obvious. It’s a weird thing internet think has glommed onto because it can be framed in sciency terms. I assume the guys that have been harping on this the past few years either didn’t have kids in this timeframe or possibly didn’t even DATE women in this timeframe. I look at my parents. My mom was 24 when she married my dad and didn’t start having kids until they were established 4 years later (read: able to support a family without leeching off the government), a year shy of the supposedly spent girl in the OP, and 38 when she had my little brother. Both parents worked. No worse for wear but somehow detestable because it didn’t happen between the ages of 16 and 22, tHe PeAk AgEs of FeRtIlItY! There is optimal and there is reality. Reality is, beyond the bossbabe nonsense, two parents working and waiting until they are established financially is the reality in the financial world we live in unless you want to live on government subsidies. You can blame women for entering the workforce and competing for jobs with men, wage growth and the middle class was actually gutted when we offshored our entire manufacturing base and anything else to chase quarterly earnings. Three kids going on four, aiming for six to seven. Take your "everyone saying this is childless" nonsense elsewhere. Peak fertility matters a great deal, just because one woman here and there is able to have a child late in life doesn't make it a viable plan, many women reach the age they finally decide to bother having children and simply cannot get pregnant, or have countless miscarriages. The evidence is also impossible to ignore that pregnancies later in life have worse outcomes. Increased rates of defects, failure to thrive, autism, and countless other issues. Failure to advocate for pregnancies during peak viability is the same as advocating for more babies in the NICU with heart failure and other issues. There are consequences to denying biological reality, consequences that carry harm and suffering. As for "it's not eeeecoooonomiiiically possible" thing, nonsense. It is expensive to have kids while Keeping Up with the Joneses. None of that shit is actually required. Purposeless burning of money with children being socially "required" is actually a fertility suppression strategy implemented by cutthroat women, so their offspring have fewer competitors. |
|
Originally Posted By MarkNH: She's no exec...... Head of Community Corgi Feb 2026 - Present · 8 mos San Francisco, California, United States 1st Marketing Hire | Employee #50 Global Cafe Sales & Marketing (US & UK) Ecosystem, Partnerships, New Media Founded Cafe Drink Partnerships at Corgi Cafe Full-Stack AI Financial Infrastructure LOL! She reads like every tech marketing "exec" I've crossed paths with. |
"Life is too serious to be taken seriously" - Ray Bradbury
KoW callsign 'Ribs'
KoW callsign 'Ribs'
|
Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: I meet most of those requirements, including post economic. I would not see her as a serious long term dating prospect. One of the benefits of knowing someone who worked in match-making, (one who herself was and is a hardcore feminist), it dispells the tiktoktard myths. The more money he has, generally the less interested he is in her money, moreso if it comes with strings attached now because she believes she's Steve Jobs. The tough part boils down to, of these wealthy people with good jobs, the female clients want to date the male clients, but the male clients really aren't all that interested in the women. "The men had types, the women had lists  ."As long as the men weren't having their time wasted (ex: if he likes tall blonde women, do not bring him frumpy brunettes, and vice versa), they were easy to work with. No shit, listening to the women is what made them quit the job. |
|
Originally Posted By 56xdx_Z: I would expect clearer communication from a Tech Executive creating a list of requirements WTF does “on the healing path (history of serious commitment ex therapists, books, retreats)” even mean? ''She's crazy.''
|
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
I'm getting down to the last box, the others have all been destroyed...
Joined:
Jun 2025
Posts:
1274
EE: 0% (0)
AZ, USA
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: One of the benefits of knowing someone who worked in match-making, (one who herself was and is a hardcore feminist), it dispells the tiktoktard myths. The more money he has, generally the less interested he is in her money, moreso if it comes with strings attached now because she believes she's Steve Jobs. The tough part boils down to, of these wealthy people with good jobs, the female clients want to date the male clients, but the male clients really aren't all that interested in the women. "The men had types, the women had lists ."As long as the men weren't having their time wasted (ex: if he likes tall blonde women, do not bring him frumpy brunettes, and vice versa), they were easy to work with. No shit, listening to the women is what made them quit the job. Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: I meet most of those requirements, including post economic. I would not see her as a serious long term dating prospect. One of the benefits of knowing someone who worked in match-making, (one who herself was and is a hardcore feminist), it dispells the tiktoktard myths. The more money he has, generally the less interested he is in her money, moreso if it comes with strings attached now because she believes she's Steve Jobs. The tough part boils down to, of these wealthy people with good jobs, the female clients want to date the male clients, but the male clients really aren't all that interested in the women. "The men had types, the women had lists ."As long as the men weren't having their time wasted (ex: if he likes tall blonde women, do not bring him frumpy brunettes, and vice versa), they were easy to work with. No shit, listening to the women is what made them quit the job. That's the paradox of successful women. Their success is of little use to a successful man, and usually of negative value to men. An unsuccessful woman that focuses on things money can't buy will beat them to the successful man almost every time. |