User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:22:07 PM EDT
[#1]
So, a lot more local boys will be getting the systems now, right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:22:09 PM EDT
[#2]
What about my public safety?
Strangely 60 minutes here covered it and throughout Sydney and other Australian cities the same thing or similar is being used. And they have no idea who'd operating them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:23:01 PM EDT
[#3]
I need to buy one of those for my personal use.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:24:03 PM EDT
[#4]
I'm glad they've added this new process where a judge will almost unthinkingly rubber stamp a piece of paper for them. I feel better already.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:25:24 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I need to buy one of those for my personal use. Well that's certainly against the law. So is using a cell jammer in the middle of your 20 sq mile property. The logic behind that I find amusing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:25:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, a lot more local boys will be getting the systems now, right? Warrant required for use in my state, by statute. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:34:57 PM EDT
[#7]
It's window dressing, of course.
We will be Lernered. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:35:39 PM EDT
[#8]
LOL, and they will force compliance, how?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:37:58 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well that's certainly against the law. So is using a cell jammer in the middle of your 20 sq mile property. The logic behind that I find amusing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I need to buy one of those for my personal use. Well that's certainly against the law. So is using a cell jammer in the middle of your 20 sq mile property. The logic behind that I find amusing. I'll just be super secretive about using it. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:40:40 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm glad they've added this new process where a judge will almost unthinkingly rubber stamp a piece of paper for them. I feel better already. Which Indian call center will be staffing the new online warrant courts? I need to call my congressman and ask him to ensure that members of the disenfranchised community have access to these new jobs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:41:16 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL, and they will force compliance, how? They will police themselves...... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 12:44:33 PM EDT
[#12]
WooHoo! I guess I'll be getting a slightly used Stingray...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:06:21 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's window dressing, of course. We will be Lernered. Parallel construction, bro. Unpapered use of Stingray leads to a "fortuitous stop for an equipment violation by a local police officer." It's easy if you are sufficiently amiable to the concept of wiping your ass with the Constitution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:16:18 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
However, the new policy will now require federal agents to obtain a court authorization or warrant to use these tracking devices in all but the direst circumstances.
Either that or get more proficient with their parallel construction stories ... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:20:40 PM EDT
[#15]
In the past I've been part of many uses of the Stingray and it was never used without a warrant except for ONE time.
That was a fresh double homicide and by the time we were done using the Stingray the warrant had been "walked through"....but we started using before we had warrant in hand, for good reason. But getting people riled up and thinking they are being used carte blanche sells a better story I guess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:25:01 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Either that or get more proficient with their parallel construction stories ... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
However, the new policy will now require federal agents to obtain a court authorization or warrant to use these tracking devices in all but the direst circumstances.
Either that or get more proficient with their parallel construction stories ... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:27:37 PM EDT
[#17]
P.T. Barnum quote appropriate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:30:50 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In the past I've been part of many uses of the Stingray and it was never used without a warrant except for ONE time. That was a fresh double homicide and by the time we were done using the Stingray the warrant had been "walked through"....but we started using before we had warrant in hand, for good reason. But getting people riled up and thinking they are being used carte blanche sells a better story I guess. Warrant/PC isn't the only issue. The devices sweep up collect a lot more than just the target devices' data, and nobody has been particularly forthcoming about what happens to that data. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:32:08 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In the past I've been part of many uses of the Stingray and it was never used without a warrant except for ONE time. That was a fresh double homicide and by the time we were done using the Stingray the warrant had been "walked through"....but we started using before we had warrant in hand, for good reason. But getting people riled up and thinking they are being used carte blanche sells a better story I guess. You're right, we should just always assume that all hands of government has the best intentions for us and whenever liberty has to be temporarily sacrificed its being done for our own good. I think we should all feel bad for ever feeling to the contrary. Heck if you're wearing a belt today, we should take them off and beat ourselves with it as punishment for ever distrusting our gracious and ever loving government. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:34:34 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're right, we should just always assume that all hands of government has the best intentions for us and whenever liberty has to be temporarily sacrificed its being done for our own good. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
In the past I've been part of many uses of the Stingray and it was never used without a warrant except for ONE time. That was a fresh double homicide and by the time we were done using the Stingray the warrant had been "walked through"....but we started using before we had warrant in hand, for good reason. But getting people riled up and thinking they are being used carte blanche sells a better story I guess. You're right, we should just always assume that all hands of government has the best intentions for us and whenever liberty has to be temporarily sacrificed its being done for our own good. Especially when they go to great lengths to not release ANY information about the devices or how they work, to the point of dismissing significant prosecutions if the device's use or workings would be compromised. That tells me they have something big to hide. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:42:55 PM EDT
[#21]
I have problems with the require destruction of records daily clause. Seems to me they are making it legally impossible to prove they used it against you. "we don't keep records" , why? "It's the law, pick up that can citizen, and move along nothing to see here".
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:44:11 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have problems with the require destruction of records daily clause. Seems to me they are making it legally impossible to prove they used it against you. "we don't keep records" , why? "It's the law, pick up that can citizen, and move along nothing to see here". Because people (rightfully) complain that they retain data from tons of non-target persons' devices. But I see your point. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:51:34 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Especially when they go to great lengths to not release ANY information about the devices or how they work, to the point of dismissing significant prosecutions if the device's use or workings would be compromised. That tells me they have something big to hide. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In the past I've been part of many uses of the Stingray and it was never used without a warrant except for ONE time. That was a fresh double homicide and by the time we were done using the Stingray the warrant had been "walked through"....but we started using before we had warrant in hand, for good reason. But getting people riled up and thinking they are being used carte blanche sells a better story I guess. You're right, we should just always assume that all hands of government has the best intentions for us and whenever liberty has to be temporarily sacrificed its being done for our own good. Especially when they go to great lengths to not release ANY information about the devices or how they work, to the point of dismissing significant prosecutions if the device's use or workings would be compromised. That tells me they have something big to hide. Or maybe because once you understand how something works you can understand how to defeat it. Maybe, once you understand you could go "Oh, is it really that simple to beat this thing?" Funny how things of all different sorts of nature seem like voodoo to everyone except the people in that industry. They on the other hand realize how simple something really is in fact. Criminals are dumb for the most part. We count on that. Because the truth is, we don't catch the really smart ones. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 1:53:55 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Because people (rightfully) complain that they retain data from tons of non-target persons' devices. But I see your point. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I have problems with the require destruction of records daily clause. Seems to me they are making it legally impossible to prove they used it against you. "we don't keep records" , why? "It's the law, pick up that can citizen, and move along nothing to see here". Because people (rightfully) complain that they retain data from tons of non-target persons' devices. But I see your point. The other side of the coin is what if they catch something (let's say your joking with a buddy about putting you ex wives on a raft then using it for target practice, with a mortar) on you while using it to tap someone else, then use that info against you, destroy the records, and claim they didn't use it. No records mister criminal, prove we didn't notice you doing something. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 2:12:13 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have problems with the require destruction of records daily clause. Seems to me they are making it legally impossible to prove they used it against you. "we don't keep records" , why? "It's the law, pick up that can citizen, and move along nothing to see here". Whether the records are destroyed or are retained, no one will ever get access to them to use as evidence that the device was used. That is the point of dismissing cases in the rare instances where the court orders the government to make the information available to the defendant. That is the point of training government agents to lie to the courts about the sources of information, a/k/a "parallel construction". That is the point of having one agent provide information to the agents who may appear in court without divulging the true source of the information, which is another tactic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2015 2:21:21 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: In the past I've been part of many uses of the Stingray and it was never used without a warrant except for ONE time. That was a fresh double homicide and by the time we were done using the Stingray the warrant had been "walked through"....but we started using before we had warrant in hand, for good reason. But getting people riled up and thinking they are being used carte blanche sells a better story I guess. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
