Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
1/24/2009 7:32:59 AM EDT
BOTD violations - in theory


that is so funny .
john
1/24/2009 7:34:52 AM EDT
[#1]
Que?

1/24/2009 7:36:50 AM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
Que?



that

last post
1/24/2009 7:37:01 AM EDT
[#3]
1/24/2009 7:37:53 AM EDT
[#4]
which one is he talking about?
1/24/2009 7:39:02 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
which one is he talking about?




Maybe there was also bickering in that thread.

1/24/2009 7:39:18 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
which one is he talking about?


mmm so many to chooooose
1/24/2009 7:40:25 AM EDT
[#7]
My lord....
1/24/2009 7:43:03 AM EDT
[#8]
Since we have a rule against showing excessive cleavage, very short skirts, bikinis, etc - there were a number of photos in that thread which violated that rule.  If we allow the rule to be dependent on HOW (subjectively) "attractive" the person is, then it will open the door for people to post skimpy bikni shots of supermodels with the justification that they don't consider her attractive, or she has a "butterface" or man hands, or whatever justification they can come up with.

Sorry.  While it seems silly, the BOTD rule is there for good reason.
1/24/2009 7:43:09 AM EDT
[#9]
^