User Panel
Posted: 9/18/2004 3:51:28 AM EDT
IANAP , but here's my idea:
Stike 18 U.S.C. 922(o) in it's entirety Could we persuade some congressman to insert something like that into some must-pass bill, one of the 200-page ones nobody ever reads? |
|
Theoretically? Its possible.
Realistically? We might be able to if we get an absolute landslide of Republican Senators and Reps and W wins again. Kharn |
|
Hi Kharn!
Didn't expect to meet you here! Anyways, do you think there could be a Republican Senator nice enough to tack it on to, say, a spending bill, like they did with the limits on NICS last year? |
|
Today I just realized something: almost all the news media mis-reported the AWB as banning full-auto weapons. And it still expired. So maybe there is hope?!?
|
|
Microbalrog:
Anything's possible, we just need to find a Senator with enough gumption to do it and withstand the media onslaught without folding. What took you so long to find this place? Kharn |
|
How about a totally pro-gun President who just doesn't give a shit, and promises a veto of EVERYTHING that Congress passes until all of 18 USC 921 and 922 are repealed?
I could be that President. Vote for me! CJ |
|
Here are some people who could help: In Congress: Ron Paul (R-TX) In Senate: Richard Shelby (R-AL) Lisa Murkowsky (R-AK) Zell Miller (D-GA) |
|
|
how about we repeal every violation of the constitution while we're at it!?!?
|
|
'Sup Balrog? Haven't seen you on THR in a while that I can remember.
Theoretically, it could work, but the problem is, a bill must be read in its entirety as part of the procedure. Plus, if it's put in as an amendment, not in the original bill, attention is immediately drawn to it. Consider, also, how familiar the gun-grabbing harpies are with what 18USC922 is. The AWB modified it. |
|
Exactly my feeling. As someone (not me) said on THR: 'C'mon, what is the Brady crowd going to do? Whine 'No, really, they are real machineguns this time around?'. |
|
|
I'm banned from THR
And how many Congressmen read the Patriot Act? |
||
|
Really? Why?
I'unno if they listened, but one of the congressmen (secretary? Minority whip? Not sure here) has to read the bill aloud in its entirety. Unless they changed that. |
||||
|
I'll pencil in CMJohnson.. I hope they can figure out its you.... |
|
|
IMO, the easiest way to deal with in the short run is for the appropriate cabinet officer (I think it's the AG now) to declare that "under the authority of the United States" in the Lautenburg Amendment (the '86 MGB) means "produced by a manufacturer licensed by the United States." End of ban, end of trouble, nothing the reds in congress can do about it except try to pass a new and explicit ban.
The other interesting thing is that at least one federal district court has overturned the MGB, based on a lack of congressional authority to ban weapons. It never went anywhere because the gov't didn't appeal the ruling. The basic theory was that the NFA was passed based solely on Congress's taxing authority, and the ban is (obviously) directly opposed to a revenue scheme based on transfer taxes, and there is no other Constitutional authority for banning guns. |
|
I LIKE IT!!! |
|
|
I just wrote to Rep. Musgrave about it. I suggest you do, too.
|
|
This really is our best chance, though no one has the stones to do it, I'm sure.
|
|
It can't be attached to a appropriations bill.
That would be against procedure. But a germain legislation bill, sure. They almost were going to try that with the AWB. CRC |
|
The same thing could be done to eliminate "silencers" from the NFA.
CRC |
|
Never happen - its a pipe dream. I wish it were otherwise, but you're kidding yourself if you think you'll ever convince more than 1-2 senators or congressmen to sign on to something like that. It would be political suicide. Besides, if by some stroke of divine intervention it ever got anywhere, I'm sure it would only be at the expense of an adjustment in the transfer tax to a level that would be cost prohibitive to most people. Can you afford a $10,000 making or transfer tax on each one? How about $20,000? Don't be so naive as to think you'll slip something like that past some of the hardcore antis in Congress and the Senate. If we knew about it, they would too (do you think they don't keep tabs on the pro-gun movement and pro-gun legislation?). They'd either make such a public issue it would be dead before it got tothe floor or they'd make it so bad even we wouldn't want it to pass.
|
|
Can you Americans write similar letters too? His e-mail is [email protected] and he leads the Congressional 2nd Amendment Caucus. |
|
|
Way to go.hug.gif
|
|
REP. MUSGRAVE IS A WOMAN! STOP WRITING MR. IF YOU WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY DO *FIVE SECONDS* OF RESEARCH /PLEASE/ SO THE REST OF US DON'T LOOK LIKE MORONS THANK YOU wwwc.house.gov/musgrave/
|
||
|
The best way to get rid of any gun law is to get rid of the "sporting purpose test".
|
|
One of my posts from AWBanSunset.com:
Let me know what you guys think. BoB |
|||
|
whats wrong with going with the original (always below, for your convience) vvvvvvvv
|
|
Because it is easier to take a nibble than it is to bite the whole thing off. That is how we got all these guns laws to begin with, slowly over time taking piece by piece. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.