Christian leader explains why Jesus was actualy trans... (Page 3 of 4)
|
Originally Posted By Predicament: I doubt she has the balls to say anything about him. Originally Posted By Predicament: Originally Posted By echo459: I wonder what she would say about Muhammad. I doubt she has the balls to say anything about him. I see what you did there... |
|
Originally Posted By GiggleSmith: Revelations 22: 18 and 19 18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. One minor quibble. It is Revelation. No s. |
|
Originally Posted By BullpupFan: Other way around. For a virgin birth, the child would be XX chromosome FEMALE and someone “assigned” them male gender somewhere along the way. But let’s not permit basic biology to confuse any theological facts. You’re thinking incorrectly. Mary was a virgin meaning never had lain with a man. Jesus has a father - according to scripture it’s God thru the power of His Holy Spirit. He is a He - XY. According to scripture. It pulls no punches on sexuality. Basic biology says you need the XX/XY union to produce the human child. XX from Mary, XY from God. Basic biology and critical for Jesus as our Messiah. |
|
Originally Posted By smartliketractor: Christians can't make up their mind where Jesus was born (inside the inn or outside the inn), nor, if there was a census taken or not..... ...so I'm not surprised some are claiming Jesus is trans and some think he was straight. Find me a mention of this debate a thousands years ago, or 500 years ago, or a 100 years ago or 50 years ago. That is not a Christian leader. |
|
Originally Posted By Ligore: Find me a mention of this debate a thousands years ago, or 500 years ago, or a 100 years ago or 50 years ago. That is not a Christian leader. Matthew vs. Luke account of how Jesus was born and the timing of the census. Matthew 2:1-23 creates the story of King Herod's threat and the flight to Egypt, forcing them to resettle in Nazareth but from Bethlehem. Luke 2:1-20 Opposite directions. Family from Bethlehem and ending up in Nazareth. Also, the census of Quirinius occured in 6CE which is 10 years after King Herod. How can Matthew claim Herod reigned during the birth of Jesus if the census was after his death? |
|
Originally Posted By voodochild: Blasphemy Originally Posted By voodochild: Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
Blasphemy |
|
Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
Theological liberals looking at the texts and only seeing themselves. Nothing new under the sun. |
|
Originally Posted By Ligore: Find me a mention of this debate a thousands years ago, or 500 years ago, or a 100 years ago or 50 years ago. That is not a Christian leader. Originally Posted By Ligore: Originally Posted By smartliketractor: Christians can't make up their mind where Jesus was born (inside the inn or outside the inn), nor, if there was a census taken or not..... ...so I'm not surprised some are claiming Jesus is trans and some think he was straight. Find me a mention of this debate a thousands years ago, or 500 years ago, or a 100 years ago or 50 years ago. That is not a Christian leader. Malokoi. Bible condemned the practice and the people that did it and called them to repentance and fixing their lives. added: I jumped the gun and thought the argument was about something else. Oddly, still on topic for the thread, just not the post replied to.
|
I bet she adheres to the Sparkle Creed and is a follower of James Talarico. In case you have been living under a rock, here is the "creed"![]() Minnesota pastor Anna Helgen reads the Sparkle Creed |
|
Originally Posted By smartliketractor: Matthew vs. Luke account of how Jesus was born and the timing of the census. Matthew 2:1-23 creates the story of King Herod's threat and the flight to Egypt, forcing them to resettle in Nazareth but from Bethlehem. Luke 2:1-20 Opposite directions. Family from Bethlehem and ending up in Nazareth. Also, the census of Quirinius occured in 6CE which is 10 years after King Herod. How can Matthew claim Herod reigned during the birth of Jesus if the census was after his death? Originally Posted By smartliketractor: Originally Posted By Ligore: Find me a mention of this debate a thousands years ago, or 500 years ago, or a 100 years ago or 50 years ago. That is not a Christian leader. Matthew vs. Luke account of how Jesus was born and the timing of the census. Matthew 2:1-23 creates the story of King Herod's threat and the flight to Egypt, forcing them to resettle in Nazareth but from Bethlehem. Luke 2:1-20 Opposite directions. Family from Bethlehem and ending up in Nazareth. Also, the census of Quirinius occured in 6CE which is 10 years after King Herod. How can Matthew claim Herod reigned during the birth of Jesus if the census was after his death? Obviously I was referring to the debate this thread is about not the census. Since your concerned for the census debate there is not a single list that has survived from Roman times containing the names of all the governors of syria. If some actual records get found it's probably just going to be no contradiction like similar sounding names or same guy served twice, etc. |
|
Originally Posted By lygxis: Malokoi. Bible condemned the practice and the people that did it and called them to repentance and fixing their lives. Originally Posted By lygxis: Originally Posted By Ligore: Originally Posted By smartliketractor: Christians can't make up their mind where Jesus was born (inside the inn or outside the inn), nor, if there was a census taken or not..... ...so I'm not surprised some are claiming Jesus is trans and some think he was straight. Find me a mention of this debate a thousands years ago, or 500 years ago, or a 100 years ago or 50 years ago. That is not a Christian leader. Malokoi. Bible condemned the practice and the people that did it and called them to repentance and fixing their lives. The Bible is not debating it. The Bible is against it. |
|
Originally Posted By TaskForce: There's nothing in the bible about chromosomes. Augustine of Hippo (AKA "Saint Augustine", a Roman citizen from what's now Algeria) announced an official Church doctrine in the 5th Century CE that 'Original Sin' emanates from male sperm. So, since everyone on Earth since Adam except Jesus of Nazareth was conceived by a mother receiving fertilization from a man's sperm all of humanity is predestined for sin and therefore Jesus was the world's only naturally sinless being from birth. Neither Jesus nor Paul said or taught anything remotely like this, but no existing movement of Christianity I'm aware of formally revoked or abrogated Augustine's declaration. It's still official Church canon and therefore inherently "Biblical". That's how it works. |
|
Attached File |
“There’s no greater enemy than the mortal enemy of a friend.”
|
Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
Episcopalians and some other mainline Protestants cannot be called Christian anymore. They have strayed way too far from Christian orthodoxy. |
-Lord Acton
|
Originally Posted By voodochild: Blasphemy Originally Posted By voodochild: Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
Blasphemy "Priestess" |
|
Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
OP correct your thread title; this reporbate is not a Christian - more like a pagan sodomite, perhaps |
|
Originally Posted By kc-coyote: I bet she adheres to the Sparkle Creed and is a follower of James Talarico. In case you have been living under a rock, here is the "creed" |
|
Originally Posted By Ecarl4100: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/84441/IMG_7877_jpeg-3831894.JPG Just another dipshit . |
|
Why can’t we all simply agree this thing is a false prophet spewing abominations. Instead like all of these threads it ends up with our modern day Pharisees arguing to no end. So many of you are self righteous and sanctimonious and are exactly who Jesus was warning the World about. |
Be nice to everyone but have a plan to kill them
|
Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
She is a priestess of SATAN. |
|
Originally Posted By PvtCowboy: Yes, but actually No. Augustine of Hippo (AKA "Saint Augustine", a Roman citizen from what's now Algeria) announced an official Church doctrine in the 5th Century CE that 'Original Sin' emanates from male sperm. So, since everyone on Earth since Adam except Jesus of Nazareth was conceived by a mother receiving fertilization from a man's sperm all of humanity is predestined for sin and therefore Jesus was the world's only naturally sinless being from birth. Neither Jesus nor Paul said or taught anything remotely like this, but no existing movement of Christianity I'm aware of formally revoked or abrogated Augustine's declaration. It's still official Church canon and therefore inherently "Biblical". That's how it works. For Catholics. |
|
Originally Posted By RunsonCLP: And this folk, is why I represent the church of the Pastafarians. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By voodochild: Blasphemy Originally Posted By voodochild: Originally Posted By greyninja: ![]()
prophecy being fulfilled before your very eyes Matthew 24:10 - 11 Jesus Himself said, "At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people." |
Training&Trigger Time are more important than chasing a hardware Holy Grail
![]() PURGE THE HERETIC! |




