Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Posted: 10/17/2004 10:05:17 PM EST
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:06:23 PM EST
damn straight yo
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:12:12 PM EST
Kali-fornia is pretty much going to Kerry, so I'm going to write in Ralph Nader.
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:15:59 PM EST
Damnit, we need PA for a solid win.


- BG
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:16:30 PM EST
Solid or not a win is a win.
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:17:16 PM EST

Originally Posted By NoMoAMMO:
Solid or not a win is a win.



Id perfer SgtAr15 be right
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:18:12 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/17/2004 10:19:47 PM EST by NightCap]
any vote you write in is a vote against bush and for kerry. since there is no way nader is going to win its a waste you may as well stay home. By all means its youre vote so do what you like i just think bush could use the help cause we know we dont want kerry to win
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:19:02 PM EST
Actually in a perfect world he would be wrong.

It should be all 50 states!
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:19:40 PM EST

Originally Posted By NoMoAMMO:
Solid or not a win is a win.




The more solid the win, the least likely the bellyaching by the libs is going to mean anything.


Can't piss and moan about Florida when Florida isn't the deciding factor!

And the libs WILL be out in force to whine, cheat, and steal.


- BG
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:23:02 PM EST
RealClearPolitics


PresidentElect.org
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:49:57 PM EST

Originally Posted By NightCap:
any vote you write in is a vote against bush and for kerry. since there is no way nader is going to win its a waste you may as well stay home. By all means its youre vote so do what you like i just think bush could use the help cause we know we dont want kerry to win



Actually if Nadar get a certain % of the vote 5%? he can get federal funding so next time around he could be stronger and able to get on more ballots to steal votes from the dems, so this is not that bad.

I'm from Il so I've thought about this too, but I can't help it I'm voting for G dubbs.
Link Posted: 10/17/2004 10:57:41 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/17/2004 10:58:28 PM EST by Dave_A]
P.S.

The Electoral-Vote.com map is misleading

They used a Rasmusen 2-way poll to make WI go 'For Kerry' by 1 point, but they forgot Nader.

Nader will get 1-2% of the vote in WI, as he IS on the ballot, and has CONTINUALLY polled in that range thruought the campaign....

Of course, the site is run by a Dem, so what do you expect...
Link Posted: 10/18/2004 10:54:28 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/18/2004 10:55:14 AM EST by AR15fan]
No state should ever be listed as undecided. absent strong evidence otherwise, any state that Bush won in 2000 he will win in 2004. A repeat of 2000 is the default setting.
Link Posted: 10/18/2004 11:02:30 AM EST
how funny would it be if Bush won Mass... I'd love that...too bad they are all fucked in the head overthere.

I hope the sox lose
Top Top