Border bill may lose felony clausewww.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060411-013918-7013rWASHINGTON, April 11 (UPI) -- A controversial provision is likely to be cut from the House's version of the immigration bill currently before the U.S. Congress, says the law's sponsor.
During rallies Monday in more than 60 cites across the country, immigrant rights advocates blasted as draconian the border security bill that has already been passed by the House of Representatives. The marchers tend to favor the broader immigration reform measure still being worked on by the Senate, according to media reports.
However, the provision in the House legislation attracting the most anger is unlikely to become law, CongressDaily said Monday, quoting a spokesman for the bill's sponsor.
Immigrant advocates are particularly angered by language in the House bill that would make it a felony to be in the United States in violation of visa conditions or other rules. At the moment, it is a criminal offence to enter the United States illegally, but merely being here illegally, for example over-staying a visa, is not a crime.
"The chairman has repeatedly said he would make sure that it is changed to a misdemeanor," a spokesman for House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis, told CongressDaily of the provision.
That still may not settle the issue, since Democrats and some Republicans have argued that mere illegal presence should not trigger criminal penalties, even as a misdemeanor.
Indeed, Democrats in the House joined with conservative House Republicans to vote down an amendment to the bill that would have reduced illegal presence to a misdemeanor, saying they would not support any criminalization that would effect for instance the innocent children of undocumented workers.
The row is complicating the bill's prospects, already uncertain after the Senate left for its two-week Easter recess without passing its own bill. The Senate bills' sponsors insist the effort to pass the reform this year is not dead.