Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
4/14/2003 5:20:53 PM EDT
Any Younger Paratroopers out there?

I was watching "mail call" just now, and they had a thing on parachutes.

Three things crossed my mind:

1) When did they change to a T-10D, and how does it differ from a T-10C

2) When did they change the style/type of static line snap hook and why?

3) why was my old squad leader (Ssg Styron) from division, a black hat at Benning, and why, after 12+years is he still a ssg?
I hope it was just really old footage!


4/15/2003 1:32:32 PM EDT
[#1]
seriously guys- no one knows?
4/15/2003 3:14:05 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
Any Younger Paratroopers out there?

I was watching "mail call" just now, and they had a thing on parachutes.

Three things crossed my mind:

1) When did they change to a T-10D, and how does it differ from a T-10C
View Quote


it change around a year ago maybe a little more. It only differs in the new universal static line.


2) When did they change the style/type of static line snap hook and why?
View Quote


The changed it because it was more costly to have 2 different types of static lines (one for the c-17 and one for the others). Plus while at Green ramp some times the Aircraft will change at last minute, so instead of changing parachutes just add or subract the 5 foot universal statc line extention.(takes less than 2 min per chute to add or subtract)
Now for the snap hook it elminated the saftey wire and lanyard. It now is a double snap, snap hook if you see it, it will make sence.


3) why was my old squad leader (Ssg Styron) from division, a black hat at Benning, and why, after 12+years is he still a ssg?
I hope it was just really old footage!
View Quote


I just hope it was old footage.......lol
4/15/2003 3:58:00 PM EDT
[#3]
thanks. I didn't realize that the static line had to be longer for a C-17. They didn't exist when I got out in 92 (as far as I knew anyway)

That reminds me, there was a bunch of our guys who went to Hondo in 88, just before I got to the unit. They jumped with the hondurans, and got to wear Hondo Jump wings. They said that they jumped from c-47s and had to have a longer static line.

4/15/2003 4:20:54 PM EDT
[#4]
I had to look this one up in the proper manual.  Here is what it said.

To prevent fouling of the T-10 or MC1-1 type parachute on the aircraft when jumping the C-46 or C-47, a 5-foot static line extension must be used.

Hey this JM learned something today.
4/23/2003 9:59:30 AM EDT
[#5]
Early on with the C-17 they had some problems with canopies collapsing due to the wierd airflow around the plane.  If you take an airplane that grosses out 260,000 lbs heavier than a C-141 and make it fly at the same speed it will have a lot more turbulence in its wake.

I've been out for a couple of years now, but I'd say it's a safe guess that the longer static line is due to that, allowing the jumpers to be farther away from the airplane before the chute opens.

Sideline: I was at Pope as a C-141 Flight Engineer in the mid- 80s.  This Airborne guy walks up to me and brags, "I get $75 a month to jump out of this airplane!"  I answered, "I get $150 to stay in it!"
4/23/2003 1:38:22 PM EDT
[#6]
So, since the static line is longer, do they have to count higher?
"one thousand...Two thousand...Three thousand...Four thousand..."
4/23/2003 5:12:14 PM EDT
[#7]
Believe it or not the same rule applies. I really don't think that 5 feet makes a difference a 130 knots/150 mph.