The poor union workers and pilots are doing the best job they can. The role of the managers/executives is to make the investors money.
So when the managers FAIL and investors lose money why is it those lowest on the rungs get treated the most harshly, while those who in theory are responsible for the performance of the company and its return to investors, get raises?
I'd be less sympathetic to the union workers if I saw it was their shiftlessness and corruption (which is true in a lot of industries) that caused airlines to lose money. If I saw the executives sharing their grief, willing to make sacridices in hard times, I would probably not sympathize with airline unions so much. But I dont see airline executives sharing the sacrifices they demand from unions over and over again. On the contrary. I see them getting obscene bonuses, completely undeserved considering how bad the stock price has done.
I talk with my uncle, who used to be CEO of an airline, about this alot. His company's top executives never made more than about $500k a year, and they always led by example cutting their own wages when times got hard. The net result? Alaska Airlines's market cap is more than the market cap of the two biggest airlines, AA and UA, COMBINED.
It's not just the just thing, it is good business.