Quote History View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
the story on this is that it's complete bullshit.
it is apparently a false-flag ploy to garner attention to bitcoin, increasing demand for the cryptocurrency, and thus driving up the exchange rate.
http://www.businessinsider.com/debunking-jp-morgan-bitcoin-2013-12
You Should Probably Ignore That 'JP Morgan Bitcoin' Patent — It's Over A Decade Old
The FT's Tracy Alloway reports today that the U.S. Patent Office has published a filing from JP Morgan regarding a payment service that some have some are saying bares a striking resemblance to Bitcoin.
But the filing is actually a renewal of a patent first filed in 1999 — meaning it significantly predates that digital currency's breakout success.
But even if you were still inclined to dig into the patent itself, you'd discover that there are really very few similarities between Bitcoin and JP Morgan's system.
The system is basically a form of repackaging the electronic credits you already use to pay for stuff online. The only new wrinkle is a Payment Portal Processor that will be tied to a digital wallet that can hold your electronic credits. The "PPP," as its referred to in the patent, will be able to "store miles, coupons, sweepstakes or other marketing incentives associated with use of the accounts linked to the PPP." It will also "[enrich] the consumer e-commerce experience by eliminating the tedious process of tilling [sic] out lengthy payment and shipping fields as this is done automatically."
...
Bitcoin has a public record of all transactions that can be viewed on a site called Blockchain, JP Morgan's system contains no such provision.
http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/52a787c4eab8ea5331ab7283-807-627/jpm%20digital%203.png
story continues at link above.
ar-jedi
A lot of people don't get the whole patent thing.
Go read about the NEWEGG case and the patent troll that holds the TQP patent. The thing is, JPM's structure does not have to be identical to bitcoin to fuck up bitcoin. JPM needs only to demonstrate that a crucial element of bitcoin, in the WAY some discreet (but essential) part of bitcoin operates, is covered by the patent.
Since the priority date goes to 1999, that will only give JPM the right to fight bitcoin by refusing to license the technology for a couple more years, but that's more than enough time to take bitcoin style things (including the block chain) and roll that into a BANK CONTROLLED ecurrency system (i.e., only banks allowed to process transactions on the blockchain) and substitute it in.
If the governments fear bitcoin (and I see a lot of evidence they do), then JPM can expect unreasonably enthusiastic cooperation from the government in enforcing the patent by corrupting bitcoin traffic, getting the fibbies out there hauling people into jail for operating the bit coin system, etc., etc. Bitcoin only works when there's a big pool of folks to process the transactions. And I have no doubt this is to try and put a chilling effect on that.
We'll have to wait and see.