Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/24/2017 4:44:23 PM
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 9/9/2004 5:33:59 AM EST
This phenomenon is nasty. I don’t understand why they have to have them. But almost every girl between the ages of 21 and 37 who wears low cut jeans has one of these tats just above her ass crack and usually its not an attractive job. Sure get a butterfly or something and put it in a place where your lover can see it but spend the money and have someone with some talent do a nice job. Don’t get a cheep ass tattoo that looks like you smeared purple colored shit up the small of your back.

HK(the old)940.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:36:09 AM EST
Yes you are!


Originally Posted By hk940:
I don’t understand why they have to have them.



It means they put out. The tattoo definately isn't there for them to look at.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:36:56 AM EST
It seems like I remember this being discussed before....

Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:37:27 AM EST
All tattoos are pretty ugly.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:39:25 AM EST
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:40:02 AM EST
The tattoo on the small of the back, just above the waistline, is called a "Whore Tat". You'll find them on many of the skankier girls. They also seem to be favored by fat chics that like to have bare midrifts.

I cringe when I see an otherwise attractive, nice girl with one.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:40:20 AM EST
I don't like them either. Aparently they don't seem to think they're very good in bed, if they feel they have to keep you entertained with "Artwork".
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:40:22 AM EST

Originally Posted By hk940:
This phenomenon is nasty. I don’t understand why they have to have them. But almost every girl between the ages of 21 and 37 who wears low cut jeans has one of these tats just above her ass crack and usually its not an attractive job. Sure get a butterfly or something and put it in a place where your lover can see it but spend the money and have someone with some talent do a nice job. Don’t get a cheep ass tattoo that looks like you smeared purple colored shit up the small of your back.




Not all fashion trends are nice. Kinda like bad boob jobs.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:41:24 AM EST
Yes, nasty in a good way.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:42:06 AM EST
nope, I agree with you completely.

Small of the back tattoos can make the hottest girl look like complete trash
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:42:21 AM EST
No you are not alone!!!
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:43:02 AM EST

Originally Posted By keving67:
nope, I agree with you completely.

Small of the back tattoos can make the hottest girl look like complete trash



Ditto...

Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:43:57 AM EST

Originally Posted By arowneragain:
It seems like I remember this being discussed before....




maybe but for some reason it got to me this morning. i am walking back from break and there is a semi-pretty girl smoking in the break area. She turns around and it looks like someone slapped the small of her back with an ink pad. i would talk to her, amybe ask her out but i don't want to expalin to any future children that mommy got a tatoo so she could advertise she was a slut.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:44:38 AM EST

Originally Posted By USMC2111:
The tattoo on the small of the back, just above the waistline, is called a "Whore Tat". You'll find them on many of the skankier girls. They also seem to be favored by fat chics that like to have bare midrifts.

I cringe when I see an otherwise attractive, nice girl with one.



A V.D. whore trap if you will.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:44:40 AM EST
...sort of like all the guys who try to look like their favorite wrestler?
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:44:57 AM EST
The only allowable butt tattoo says "Property of GunLvr".
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:45:07 AM EST
Whorish, Nasty, untested by TIME.
Just wait till they are in their late 40's and 50's and the image starts to skew.......Pewwwwww.

After a stint in the Corps I managed to get out.....even after visiting some of the best Ink Shops in the Country........unscathed and without a tattoo. Never even came close. Chicks who do that are about on par with chicks who smoke. I love the way the bottom of an ashtray tastes......
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:45:26 AM EST
.....slut ink
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:46:19 AM EST
Back in high school (1980s), we used to have a phrase: "If they smoke, they poke!"

It seems that these lower back tatoos have taken over that role.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:51:31 AM EST
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:53:46 AM EST
Around here they are called "goal posts". Cause if you see them, you can almost always score.

I don't like them. That and cheap tatoos on the legs that look like a blind epileptic inked it while suffering the DT's.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:55:06 AM EST
Girls with tatoos are (most likely) DEMOCRATS!
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:56:14 AM EST
nasty like a fox.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 5:59:20 AM EST
The only tattoos that don't look nasty or slutty to me are the small, innocent kind (like a cartoon character) on the ankle. Those I have no issue with and can even like. But anything else is over-the-top as far as I'm concerned.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:00:05 AM EST
If she's showing one off, she's too trashy for my tastes. But then, I wear a pressed shirt and tie to the office every day.

No tats, no piercings outside the earlobes, no smoking, please.

Kharn
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:01:02 AM EST
thread...


useless...


pix....


you know the drill.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:01:31 AM EST
Any tattoo on a woman is nasty.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:09:09 AM EST
No tats for me, thankyou.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:10:49 AM EST
I never understood the whole tattoo craze.

Is it supposed to be artistic?
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:17:31 AM EST
People who own guns are dumb.



Just because some jacass with a gun shoots up a school doesn't mean that we're all lunatics.
Just because a woman has a tattoo means she's a slut.



I'm not a big fan of tattoos, but don't mind the smaller less visible ones, but to each their own.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:20:25 AM EST
I'm married.....

I don't see them, as my wife doesn't have one.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:21:46 AM EST
I saw a "rubenesque" if you will, gal at college the other day with one. Part of it got tattooed over the stretch marks
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:24:20 AM EST
Don't like them. Don't like those dang belly button rings neither.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:25:23 AM EST
Tats are okay on other women, not mine
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:38:22 AM EST
[Last Edit: 9/9/2004 6:40:30 AM EST by ScaryGuy]

Originally Posted By SWIRE:
Yes you are!




No, He's Not. It's pure trashy, and nothing else.

SG
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:54:28 AM EST

Originally Posted By thebeekeeper1:
I posted this once before--I know a woman (early 30's now) who has a butterfly tattooed on her butt cheek. (I've not seen it) Due to medical problems she has been on steroids and gained ~100 lbs. I bet that butterfly now looks like a TARP Buzzard!



Fixed it for ya...
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:57:55 AM EST

Originally Posted By SWIRE:
Yes you are!


Originally Posted By hk940:
I don’t understand why they have to have them.



It means they put out. The tattoo definately isn't there for them to look at.



DING DING DING!!!! Please tell our contest what he's won!
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:58:12 AM EST
I have news fer ya: These tatoos you guys are whining about are very popular with high school girls too. It isn't just the 21-35 years olds getting them.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 6:58:33 AM EST
Dumb whores put them there for a reason - Because they are.

They're not only unsightly, but a real downer to see someone you thought you liked with one. Any tattoo on a female is unattractive though... But, crack tats take the cake.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 8:26:39 AM EST
I now remember WTF I stopped comming here. This board is full of self righteous ignorant fucking assholes.

Just because you disagree with something does not make it wrong.

If your logic was applied to gunowners instead of tattoos/piercings/jap cars/religion everyone on this board would be a toothless, STD infested, PBR Swilling, sister humping, redneck, with a combined IQ of 3.


Get the fuck over yourselves already.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 8:37:07 AM EST

Originally Posted By PONY_DRIVER:Just because you disagree with something does not make it wrong.


The question was "Am I the only one that thinks girls with butt tattoos look nasty?"

Heaven forbid someone have an opinion.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 8:45:29 AM EST

Originally Posted By Charging_Handle:
The only tattoos that don't look nasty or slutty to me are the small, innocent kind (like a cartoon character) on the ankle. Those I have no issue with and can even like. But anything else is over-the-top as far as I'm concerned.



+1

of the ones I've met, the more they had, the trashier they were (and the more self-esteem issues they had)

Link Posted: 9/9/2004 8:52:33 AM EST

Originally Posted By gus:
Any tattoo on a woman is nasty.



I agree. I see a slut with a tattoo and it reminds me of internet porn trash whores.

Such a turn off.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 8:58:38 AM EST
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:00:22 AM EST

Originally Posted By Jack_T:

Originally Posted By PONY_DRIVER:Just because you disagree with something does not make it wrong.


The question was "Am I the only one that thinks girls with butt tattoos look nasty?"

Heaven forbid someone have an opinion.




It's not your question, just some of the responses,

You are entitled to your own opinions as I am mine. It is my opinion that Arsecom is over run by overbearing assholes who are as hypocritical as those they despise. JMHO YMMV.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:01:39 AM EST

Originally Posted By PONY_DRIVER:

Originally Posted By Jack_T:

Originally Posted By PONY_DRIVER:Just because you disagree with something does not make it wrong.


The question was "Am I the only one that thinks girls with butt tattoos look nasty?"

Heaven forbid someone have an opinion.




It's not your question, just some of the responses,

You are entitled to your own opinions as I am mine. It is my opinion that Arsecom is over run by overbearing assholes who are as hypocritical as those they despise. JMHO YMMV.



I don't despise people who have tattoos.

I merely despise their tattoos.

There is a difference.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:09:39 AM EST

Originally Posted By PONY_DRIVER:

everyone on this board would be a toothless, PBR Swilling, sister humping, redneck, with a combined IQ of 3.




dAMN, SOUNDS LIKE ONE OF MY FAMILY REUNIONS. dONT BE A playa hata

Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:12:39 AM EST
The worst is when an otherwise pretty chick gets a Tatt.

If a fat pig has one, it's no biggie cuz she's gross anyway.
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:13:31 AM EST
I just saw a chubby woman with a "whore band tattoo" wearing low cut pants and the tattoo was actually bouncing while she walked.

I think some women get the whore band to attract men?

I see so many people with tats these days, you cant go anywhere without seeing a tattoo these days

Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:13:33 AM EST

If your logic was applied to gunowners instead of tattoos/piercings/jap cars/religion everyone on this board would be a toothless, STD infested, PBR Swilling, sister humping, redneck, with a combined IQ of 3.



So?????
Link Posted: 9/9/2004 9:16:06 AM EST

Originally Posted By Thunderbolt:
I just saw a chubby woman with a "whore band tattoo" wearing low cut pants and the tattoo was actually bouncing while she walked.

I think some women get the whore band to attract men?

I see so many people with tats these days, you cant go anywhere without seeing a tattoo these days




Everybody is looking for love.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Top Top