Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 3/15/2011 10:31:17 PM EST
[Last Edit: 3/15/2011 10:32:59 PM EST by Alien]
I saw this story on Inside Edition today. The fact that the guy was brought up on felony child pornography charges brings my fucking blood to a boil. WHAT CRIME did he commit? What is this country coming to? Was it tasteless? Definitely. Should he have had a charge hanging over his head that could have meant 20 years in jail and a sex offender conviction for it? FUCK NO. The DA and judge should have been strung up by their balls for allowing it to goto trial.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/us/08muskegon.html

Mr. Emory, 21, an aspiring singer and songwriter, became a household name here last month when he edited a video to make it appear that elementary school children in a local classroom were listening to him sing a song with graphic sexual lyrics. He then showed the video in a nightclub and posted it on YouTube.

Mr. Emory, who had gotten permission to sing songs like "Lunchlady Land” for the first graders, waited until the students left for the day and then recorded new, sexually explicit lyrics, miming gestures to accompany them. He then edited the video to make it seem as if the children were listening to the sexual lyrics and making faces in response.
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 10:40:14 PM EST
To scared to click on the link for fear of being charged for trafficking in child porn.
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 10:46:15 PM EST
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 10:51:42 PM EST
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 10:57:46 PM EST
Originally Posted By Aimless:
sounds like they'll end up letting him plead to a non sex offense and give him some weekends in jail

the kid is a little peckerhead even if he is over charged


Ugh... the moral hazards in this thread!

On one hand, I hope 'Artists' of his kind all die in a fire(tm) but on the other hand we are still free to be little peckerheads in America.

I can't fucking believe that this went to trial.... Didn't the detectives interview the staff or custodians that would have been necessary to make the video to straighten things out?
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 11:06:12 PM EST
Originally Posted By Cypher15:


Link Posted: 3/15/2011 11:27:56 PM EST
[Last Edit: 3/15/2011 11:28:33 PM EST by Alien]

Originally Posted By Aimless:
sounds like they'll end up letting him plead to a non sex offense and give him some weekends in jail

the kid is a little peckerhead even if he is over charged

IIRC he has to do 60 days in jail but is currently out on bail. I can't remember if he'll have to register as a sex offender. It wasn't a song about sex with kids. It was a raunchy song no worse than any of the rap shit that is on the radio or blasting from your average ghetto car these days.
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 11:32:46 PM EST
Originally Posted By Alien:

Originally Posted By Aimless:
sounds like they'll end up letting him plead to a non sex offense and give him some weekends in jail

the kid is a little peckerhead even if he is over charged

IIRC he has to do 60 days in jail but is currently out on bail. I can't remember if he'll have to register as a sex offender. It wasn't a song about sex with kids. It was a raunchy song no worse than any of the rap shit that is on the radio or blasting from your average ghetto car these days.


And in case some retard doesn't read...

WAS NOT PERFORMED IN FRONT OF ANY KIDS.
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 11:34:08 PM EST
While I don't agree with child porn charges based on what the news article explains, I feel it isn't right to record individuals and then use the recording to promote yourself in a video without permission of those that you recorded. That includes letting the individuals know what the recording will be when permission is obtained.
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 11:39:03 PM EST
Link Posted: 3/15/2011 11:42:35 PM EST
We did that to death here. I tracked down the statute in question, and it does not begin to address the video. That is to say, what is done on the video is not prohibited by the statute. If the prosecution moves ahead, that guy will get rich off a crappy home-made film.
Link Posted: 3/16/2011 12:29:31 AM EST
Was it in Wisconscion and union sponsored deal?..seems like a stoopid ass thing for an "artist" to do.........in America they call him an 'Artiste" and in France a cocksucker
Link Posted: 3/16/2011 1:15:07 AM EST
Some of this "sexual offender" stuff has gotten out of control.

Charge the guy for littering for spreading that garbage around but not child porn.
Link Posted: 3/16/2011 2:07:59 AM EST
He must not have $$$ like R. Kelly.
Link Posted: 3/16/2011 2:22:09 AM EST
Originally Posted By Aimless:
sounds like they'll end up letting him plead to a non sex offense and give him some weekends in jail

the kid is a little peckerhead even if he is over charged


"Over charged"? Why was he charged?
Top Top